Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2007 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 4

The hypospadias profile in Turkey: A multicentric study

Türkiye’nin hipospadiyas profili: Çok merkezli çalışma

Pages
471–475
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The hospitalization time was found to be higher than expected.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Patients who underwent hypospadias repair in nine different centers were evaluated retrospectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Between 2001 and 2006, 1483 patients with hypospadias, mean age of 5.8 years, who underwent hypospadias operation in nine different centers of Turkey, were enrolled to this epidemiological study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The hospitalization time was found to be higher than expected.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Üretra · Ürogenital anomaliler · Hipospadyas

Abstract

Introduction: Patients who underwent hypospadias repair in nine different centers were evaluated retrospectively. Materials and Methods: Between 2001 and 2006, 1483 patients with hypospadias, mean age of 5.8 years, who underwent hypospadias operation in nine different centers of Turkey, were enrolled to this epidemiological study. They were evaluated according to the localization of hypospadiac meatus, associated congenital anomalies, the type of operation technique, chordee status and hospitalization time. Results: It was realized that hypospadias was recognized by parents in 57%, by doctors in physical examination in 18%. 13% was noted during the birth, and 10% was recognized by an unlicensed traditional circumciser. 11% of patients had already been circumcised on admission and chordee was present in 24%. The location of hypospadiac meatus was glandular/coronal in 38%, distal penile in 50%, proximal penile in 6% and penoscrotal in 6%. There were associated congenital external genital anomalies in 9.7%. While 77% of the patients underwent TIP urethroplasty, MAGPI was performed in 11%, Mathieu was performed in 5% and 105 patients underwent other surgical techniques. Urethral route was used in 1160 (78%) patients, while suprapubic route was used in 251 patients (17%) for urinary diversion. In 72 patients, no diversion was performed. The mean hospitalization time of patients was 3 days (1-20 day). Conclusion: Half of the cases with hypospadias were recognized by parents and 11% were found to have been circumcised before admission. While the incidence of associated congenital external genital organ anomalies was found to be lower than that of the literature, TIP urethroplasty was the most common technique in hypospadias repair. The hospitalization time was found to be higher than expected.

Özet

Dokuz değişik merkezde son 6 yılda hipospadiyas nedeniyle ameliyat edilen hastalar retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Böylece ülkemizdeki güncel hipospadiyas profili çıkarılmaya çalışıldı. 2001-2006 yılları arasında dokuz farklı üroloji kliniğinde hipospadiyas cerrahisi uygulanan 1483 hasta retrospektif olarak incelendi. Başvuru sırasındaki yaş ortalaması 5.8 yıl (1 ay-41 yıl) olan hastalar, tanının kimin tarafından konulduğu, hipospadiyasın yerleşimi, eşlik eden doğumsal bozukluklar, uygulanan ameliyat tekniği, varsa kateterizasyon türü ve hastanede kalış süresi bakımından değerlendirildi. Hastaların ameliyat sırasındaki ortalama yaşı 5.9 yıl olarak bulundu. %57’sinin hipospadiyası bulunduğu annebaba tarafından fark edilmiş iken, %18’i herhangi bir sebeple başvurduğu doktor tarafından, %13’ü doğum sırasında doktor ya da ebe tarafından ve %10’u ise sünnetçi tarafından fark edilmişti. 165 hasta (%11) başvuru sırasında sünnetli idi ve 360 hastada (%24) eşlik eden kordi mevcuttu. Hipospadiyak meatus yerleşimi %38’inde glanülar/koronal, %50’sinde distal penil, %6’sında proksimal penil ve %6’sında penoskrotal idi. Toplam hastaların %9.7’sinde eşlik eden doğumsal eksternal genital organ bozukluğu vardı (62 olguda kriptorşidi, 39 inguinal herni ve/veya hidrosel, 17 penoskrotal transpozisyon, 6 megameatus, 20 olguda diğerleri). Hastaların %77’sine TIP üretroplasti (1141), %11’ine MAGPI (163), %5’ine Mathieu (74) ve 105 hastaya ise diğer cerrahi teknikler uygulanmıştı. Ameliyatta 1160 hasta (%78) üretral yoldan, 251 hasta (%17) suprapubik olarak kateterize edilirken, 72 hastada herhangi bir diversiyon yöntemi kullanılmamıştı. Olguların hastanede ortalama kalış süresi 3 gün (1-20 gün) olarak bulundu. Bu çok merkezli çalışmamız hipospadiyas olgularının yaklaşık yarısının anne-baba tarafından fark edildiğini ve %11’inin başvuru sırasında sünnetli olduğunu göstermiştir. Ek doğumsal bozukluk (kriptorşidi, inguinal herni) oranı yayın bilgilerine göre düşüktür. TIP üretroplasti, yayınlar ile uyumlu olarak günümüzde hipospadiyas cerrahisinde en sık kullanılan tekniktir. Hastanede kalış süresinin nispeten yüksek olması dikkat çekicidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAMAN, İ. M., KAYA, C., ÖZKOVANCI, Ü., OKTAR, T., EMİR, H., ULMAN, İ., GERMİYANOĞLU, C., DALKILIÇ, A., TAŞÇI, A. İ., GÖKTAŞ, C. (2007). The hypospadias profile in Turkey: A multicentric study. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 4, 471–475. https://ajindex.com/articles/328730

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Baskin LS: Hypospadias and urethral development. J Urol; 163: 951-956, 2000
  2. Leonard JP, David E, Richard JJ: Hypospadias trends in two US surveillance systems. Pediatrics; 100: 831-4, 1997
  3. Dold H: Rise in prevalence of hypospadias. Lancet; 351: 770-5, 1998
  4. Baskin LS, Duckett JW: Hypospadias. In Stringer MD, Oldham KT, Mouriquand PDE, Howard ER eds, Pediatric Surgery and Urology: Long Term Outcomes. Chapt 45. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 559-567, 1998
  5. Khuri FJ, Hardy BE, Churchill BM: Urologic anomalies associated with hypospadias. Urol Clin North Am; 8: 565-71, 1981
  6. Baskin LS: Hypospadias. Adv Exp Med Biol; 545: 3-22, 2004
  7. Borer JG, Bauer SB, Peters CA, Diamond DA, Atala A, Cilento BG, et al: Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty: Expanded use in primary and repeat surgery for hypospadias. J Urol; 165: 581, 2001
  8. Snodgrass W: Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias. J Urol; 151: 464, 1994
  9. Cook A, Khoury AE, Neville C, Bagli DJ, Farhat WA, Pipi Salle JL: A multicenter evaluation of technical preferences for primary hypospadias repair. J Urol; 174: 2354-7, 2005
  10. Retik AB, Atala A: Complications of hypospadias repair. Urol Clin North Am; 29: 329-339, 2002
  11. Rabinowitz R: Outpatient catheterless modified Mathieu hypospadias repair. J Urol; 138: 1074-6, 1987
  12. Nuininga JE, de Gier RPE, Verschuren R, Feitz WF: Long-term outcome of different types of 1-stage hypospadias repair. J Urol; 174: 1544-8, 2005
  13. Rushton HG and Belman AB: The split prepuce in situ onlay hypospadias repair. J Urol; 160: 1334-1336, 1998
  14. Chen SC, Yang SS, Hsieh CH, Chen YT: Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for proximal hypospadias. BJU Int; 86: 1050, 2000.