Journals / Marmara Medical Journal / 2009 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

Our 6-year experience in radical cystectomy

6 yıllık radikal sistektomi deneyimimiz

Pages
1–7
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Radical cystectomy is found to be effective treatment modality with low complication rates parallel to the data in the literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Bladder cancer is the second most common cancer of the urinary tract.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patient and Methods: We evaluated 71 patients who underwent radical cystectomy, retrospectively according to their demographic properties, pre-operative and post-operative pathologies and method of urinary diversion and the complications between January 2003 and 2008.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Radical cystectomy is found to be effective treatment modality with low complication rates parallel to the data in the literature.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Bladder cancer is the second most common cancer of the urinary tract. Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion is the gold standard treatment model of invasive bladder cancer. Patient and Methods: We evaluated 71 patients who underwent radical cystectomy, retrospectively according to their demographic properties, pre-operative and post-operative pathologies and method of urinary diversion and the complications between January 2003 and 2008. Results: Mean follow-up was 28.8 months after the operation. The pathologic stage was superficial at 13 patients (18%), T2 at 20 patients (28%), T3 at 25 patients (35%) and T4 at 14 patients (19%). Squamous cell carcinoma was reported in 7 and lymph node metastasis was in 24 patients. Postoperative short-term complications were wound infection in 12, wound eventration at 6, ileus in 3 and urinary leakage form ureteroileal anastomosis in 2 patients. Additionally, loop stenosis in 1 patient and allergic reaction due to urostomy material in 1 patient were noted. 2 patients died at the same time day after the operation. Conclusion: Radical cystectomy is found to be effective treatment modality with low complication rates parallel to the data in the literature.

Özet

Giriş: Mesane kanseri üriner sistemin en sık görülen ikinci kanseridir. Radikal sistektomi ve üriner diversiyon, invaziv mesane tümörlerinin tedavisinde altın standarttır. Kliniğimizde radikal sistektomi operasyonu uygulanan hastalar retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Yöntem: Ocak 2003 ve 2008 tarihleri arasında kliniğimizde mesane tümörü nedeni ile radikal sistektomi operasyonu uygulanmış 71 hasta retrospektif olarak demografik özellikler, preoperatif ve postoperatif patolojileri ile uygulanan üriner diversiyon yöntemleri açısından değerlendirildi. Ayrıca, operasyon sırasında ve hastaların takibinde görülen komplikasyonlar da incelendi. Bulgular: Operasyon sonrası ortalama takip süresi 28,8 ay idi. Patolojik evreleme 13 hastada (%18) noninvaziv rapor edilirken, 20 hastada (%28) T2, 25 hastada (%35) T3, 14 hastada (%19.7) ise evre T4 tümör rapor edildi. Hastalardan 7'sinde squamoz hücreli karsinom bildirilirken, 24 hastada lenf nodu metastazı tespit edildi. Postoperatif erken dönemde 12 hastada yara yeri enfeksiyonu, 6 hastada yara evantrasyonu, 3 hastada ileus, 2 hastada üreteroileal anastomozdan idrar kaçağı vardı. Postoperatif geç dönemde ise birer olguda loop stenozu ve ürostomi materyaline karşı alerjik reaksiyon gözlemlendi. İki hastada exitus gelişmişti. Sonuç: Radikal sistektomi operasyonu literatür ile uyumlu morbidite ve mortalite oranları ile yapılabilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, C., KOCA, O., KELEŞ, M. O., YILMAZ, G., ÖZTÜRK, M., KANBEROĞLU, H., KARAMAN, M. İ. (2009). Our 6-year experience in radical cystectomy. Marmara Medical Journal, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 1–7. https://ajindex.com/articles/284040

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Zlotta AR, Schulman CC. Biological markers in superficial bladder tumors and their prognostic significance. Urol Clin North Am 2000; 27(1):179-89
  2. Parkin DM, Pisanni P, Ferlay J: Global cancer statistics. CA-Can Clin 1999; 49: 33-64
  3. Bedük Y.Mesane tümörleri, Ürogenital tümörler, Temel Üroloji 1998; 707-711
  4. Manunta A, Vincendeau S, Kiriakou G, Lobel B, Guille F. Non-transitional cell bladder carcinomas. BJU Int 2005; 95(4):497-502
  5. Chaudhary R, Bromley M, Clarke NW, Betts CD, Barnard RJ, Ryder WD, et al. Prognostic relevance of micro-vessel density in cancer of the urinary bladder. Anticancer Res 1999; 19(4C):3479-84
  6. Petersen RO: Urologic pathology, 2 'th edition, 1992
  7. Murphy WM: Disease of urinary bladder, urethra, ureters and renal pelves.Urol Pathology 1989; 34-146
  8. Rosai and Ackerman's Surgical Pathology, in Rosai J ed. Volume 1. 9th ed. Philadelphia, Mosby 2004; 1317-59
  9. Lapham RL, Grignon D, Ro JY. Pathologic prognostic parameters in bladder urothelial biopsy, transurethral resection, and cystectomy specimens. Semin Diagn Pathol 1997; 14(2):109-22
  10. Heney NM, Natural history of bladder cancer. Urol Clin North Am 1992; 19: 429-432
  11. Weiner HG, Vooijis GP. and Van't Hof-Grootenboer B. Accuracy of urine cytology in the diagnosis of primary and recurrent bladder cancer. Acta Cytol 1993; 37: 163
  12. Rıchard E, Hautmann R: Urinary Diversion: Ileal Conduit To Neobladder. J Urol 2003; 169:834-842
  13. Bricker EM: Bladder substitution after pelvic evisceration. Surg Clin North Am 1950; 30: 1511-21
  14. Richie JP, Skinner DG: Ureterointestinal diversion. In: Walsh P, Gittes R, Perlmutter A, Stamey T (eds) Campbell's Urology, 5th ed. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 2601-2619 urinary reservoir. Radiology 1986; 161: 477-483
  15. Dahm P PD. The role of cystectomy in the management of superficial bladder cancer. Urol Integr Invest 2001; 6(2):134-8
  16. Lerner SP, Skinner DG: Radical cystectomy for bladder cancer; in Comprehensive Textbook of Genitourinary Oncology (Eds). Volgezang NJ, Scardino PT, Shiply WU, Coffey DS.: Second edition. Lippincott Williams&Wilkins, 2000; 425-447
  17. Stein JJ, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, et al: Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: Longterm results in 1054 patients. J Clin Oncol. 19: 666-675, 2001
  18. Millikan R, Dinney C, Swanson D, et al. Integrated therapy for locally advanced bladder cancer: final report of a randomized trial of cystectomy plus adjuvant M-VAC versus cystectomy