Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2006 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4

The results of bulbourethral male sling in post-prostatectomy incontinence patients: A preliminary report

Prostatektomi sonrası idrar kaçırma nedeniyle uyguladığımız bulboüretral erkek askı ameliyatı: Erken dönem sonuçlarımız

Pages
533–537
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall success rate was found to be 84%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: The short-term results of bulbourethral male sling operation in patients with postprostatectomy incontinence were evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: A total of 13 male patients with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence who underwent bulbourethral male sling operation between June 2004 and February 2006 were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall success rate was found to be 84%.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:İdrar kaçırma · Ürolojik cerrahi prosedürler · Prostatektomi

Abstract

Introduction: The short-term results of bulbourethral male sling operation in patients with postprostatectomy incontinence were evaluated. Materials and Methods: A total of 13 male patients with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence who underwent bulbourethral male sling operation between June 2004 and February 2006 were evaluated. All patients except one (4-5 pads/d) had total urinary incontinence. 5 patients underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP), 4 had transvesical prostatectomy (TVP), and other 4 cases had transurethral prostatectomy (TUR-p) as the cause of urinary incontinence. Additionally, 7 patients had a history of internal urethrotomy due to stricture, and 2 patients were found to have undergone bladder neck injection to prevent incontinence prior to admission. The mean period of incontinence was 32.2 months (6-60 months) before the operation. 16 procedures were performed in 13 patients. The patients were evaluated after bulbourethral sling operation and classified as cure, improvement, and no change. Results: The mean age of patients at operation was 70.5 years (range: 62-79 yrs). The mean follow-up period was 14.5 months (range: 3-24). Six of 13 patients (46%) were dry, five (38%) were improved, and 2 patients (16%) were incontinent. The overall success rate was found to be 84%. The repetitive operations were performed in these failed cases. Suprapubic tract infection was found in one and perineal numbness was present in 4 cases. Conclusion: The bulbourethral male sling operation in short-term period is safe and effective in controlling urinary incontinence due to the insufficiency of external sphincter in men after prostate surgery. The large studies with longer term follow-up period are warranted.

Özet

Prostatektomi ameliyatı sonrası gelişen idrar kaçırma nedeniyle uyguladığımız bulböüretral erkek askı ameliyatının kısa dönem sonuçları değerlendirildi. Haziran 2004 ve Şubat 2006 yılları arasında prostatektomi ameliyatı sonrası gelişen idrar kaçırmaya yönelik bulböüretral erkek askı ameliyatı uyguladığımız 13 erkek hasta çalışmaya alındı. Biri hariç (4-5 ped/gün) tüm hastalarda sürekli idrar kaçırma vardı. 5 hastada radikal retropubik prostatektomi (RRP), 4’ünde transvezikal prostatektomi (TVP) ve diğer 4’ünde ise transüretral prostatektomi (TUR-P) ameliyatı öyküsü mevcuttu. Toplam 7 hastanın daha önceden üretral darlık nedeniyle internal üretrotomi ameliyatı geçirdiği ve 2 hastaya başka merkezlerde idrar kaçırmaya yönelik mesane boynu enjeksiyonu yapıldığı öğrenildi. Ortalama idrar kaçırma süresi 32,2 ay (6-60 ay) olarak saptandı. Hastalar bulböüretral polipropilen meş ile erkek askı ameliyatı sonrası takiplerinde idrar kaçırma yönünden; kuru, klinik iyileşme ve başarısız olarak sınıflandırıldı. Hastaların ameliyat sırasındaki ortalama yaşı 70,5 yıl (62-79) idi. Ameliyatı takiben ortalama olarak 14,5 ay (3- 24 ay) süreyle takip edilen hastalardan 6’sının (%46) tam kuru olduğu görüldü. 5’inde (%38) klinik iyileşme vardı ve 2 hastada (%16) ise başarısız olunduğu görüldü. Toplam yanıt oranı ise (tam kuru veya klinik iyileşme) %84 (11 hasta) olarak bulundu. Tekrar edilen ameliyatların tümü bu iki başarısız olunan hastaya yapılmıştı. 1 hastada (%7) suprapubik kateter traktı enfeksiyonu ve 4 hastada ise perineal hissizlik mevcuttu. Prostatektomi sonrası idrar kaçırması bulunan hastalara uyguladığımız bulböüretral polipropilen erkek askı ameliyatının erken dönem sonuçları yayınlar ile uyumlu bulunmuştur. Daha çok hasta sayısı ve uzun takip süresi olan çalışmalara gereksinim vardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, C., KANBEROĞLU, H., YILMAZ, G., İLKTAÇ, A., ÖZTÜRK, M. İ., KARAMAN, İ. M. (2006). The results of bulbourethral male sling in post-prostatectomy incontinence patients: A preliminary report. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4, 533–537. https://ajindex.com/articles/328785

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Castle E, Andrews P, Itano N, et al: Male sling postprostatectomy incontinence: Mean follow up 18 months. J Urology; 173: 1657-60, 2005
  2. Victor W, Nitti MD: Postprostatectomy Incontinence; in Campells Urology. Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED JR, Wein AJ: Eighth edition.Vol 2. Chapter 28, 1053-1068, 2002
  3. Madjar S, Jacoby B, Giberti C, et al: Bone anchored sling for the treatment of postprostatectomy incontinence. J Urology; 165: 72-76, 2001
  4. Fowler FJ, Barry MJ, Yao G, et al: Patient-reported complications and follow-up treatment after radical prostatectomy. The National Medicare Experience: 1988- 1990 (updated June 1993). Urology, 42: 622-29, 1993
  5. Litwiller SE, Djavan B, Richier J, et al: Radical retropubic prostatectomy in a community practice setting Analysis of long-term outcomes, continence and potency status, and retreatment rates. J Urol. suppl. 153: 252A,abstract 94, 1995
  6. Steiner MS, Morton RA and Walsh PC: Impact of anatomical radical prostatectomy on urinary continence. J Urol. 145: 512-14, 1991
  7. Smith DN, Appell RA, Rackley RR, et al: Collagen injection therapy for postprostatectomy incontinence. J Urology, 160: 364-67, 1998
  8. Elliott DS and Barrett DM: Mayo Clinic long-term analysis of the functional durability of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol. 159: 1206-08, 1998
  9. Goldwasser B, Furlow WL and Barrett DM: The model AS 800 artificial urinary sphincter: Mayo Clinic experience. J Urol. 137: 668-71, 1987
  10. Smith DN, Appell RA, Rackley RR, et al: Collagen injection therapy for post-prostatectomy incontinence. J Urol. 160: 364-67, 1998
  11. Sanchez-Ortiz RF, Broderick GA, Chaikin DC, et al: Collagen injection therapy for post-radical retropubic prostatectomy incontinence: role of Valsalva leak point pressure. J Urol. 158: 2132-36, 1997
  12. Litwiller SE, Kim KB, Fone PD, et al: Post-prostatectomy incontinence and the artificial urinary sphincter: A long-term study of patient satisfaction and criteria for success. J Urol. 156: 1975-80, 1996
  13. Elliot DS and Barrett DM: Mayo Clinic long-term analysis of the functional durability of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter: A review of 323 cases. J Urol. 159:1206-08, 1998
  14. Clemens JQ, Stern JA, Bushman WA, et al: Long term results of Stamey bladder neck suspension: Direct comparison with Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz procedure. J Urol. 160: 372, 1998
  15. Klutke JJ, Subir C, Andriole G, et al: Long-term results after antegrade collagen injection for stres