Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2006 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3

Efficacy and safety of caudal anaesthesia performed with 0.1% bupivacain in transrectal ultrasography-guided prostate biopsy

Transrektal ultrason eşliğinde prostat iğne biyopsisinde %0.1 bupivakainle yapılan kaudal anestezinin etkinliği ve güvenilirliği

Pages
411–415
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Caudal anesthesia with combination low concentration of local anesthetic and opioid is effective and reliable method for preventing the pain during transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: A lot of techniques have been suggested for pain control during multiple transrectal prostate biopsies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: In the Urology Clinic of Atatürk University Hospital, 50 patients underwent transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy because of increased prostate specific antigen or abnormal finding at the rectal examination. 15 ml 0.1% bupivacaine with 50 µg fentanil was injected into caudal space of the all patients 20 minutes before the procedure.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Caudal anesthesia with combination low concentration of local anesthetic and opioid is effective and reliable method for preventing the pain during transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ürolojik hastalıklar · Tedavi sonucu · Anestezi

Abstract

Introduction: A lot of techniques have been suggested for pain control during multiple transrectal prostate biopsies. In the present pilot study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of caudal anaesthesia with combination low concentration of local anesthetic and opioid for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Materials and Methods: In the Urology Clinic of Atatürk University Hospital, 50 patients underwent transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy because of increased prostate specific antigen or abnormal finding at the rectal examination. 15 ml 0.1% bupivacaine with 50 µg fentanil was injected into caudal space of the all patients 20 minutes before the procedure. Their pain scores were assessed using a visual analog pain scale during probe insertion into anal canal, probe maneuver and biopsies separately. The degree of motor block was assessed with the Bromage scale Results: Visual analog pain scale scores were assessed during the all stages of the procedure as 0-2. Incidences of the scores of 1, 0 and 2 during the probe insertion into anal canal were 24 (48%), 24 (48%) and 2 (4%), respectively. The scores of 1, 0 and 2 during the probe maneuvers were 34(68%), 14(28%) and 2 (4%), respectively. The scores of 1, 0 and 2 during the biopsies were 30 (60%), 14 (28%) and 2(4%), respectively. The patients' satisfactions were bad 1 (2%), good 12 (24%) and very good 37(74%). Bromage scale was 0 for all patients. Three patients experienced urinary retention. Conclusion: There is no doubt that it is of great importance that a proper method of anesthesia which will improve patient tolerance of this procedure, be quick in onset of action, have an easily reversible effect and result in minimum side effects, while allowing it to be performed on an outpatient basis be developed for the daily practice. Caudal anesthesia is used to provide perioperative analgesia for procedures below the umbilicus. Caudal anesthesia with combination low concentration of local anesthetic and opioid is effective and reliable method for preventing the pain during transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy.

Özet

Transrektal prostat biyopsisi işleminde ağrının kontrolü için birçok yöntem önerilmektedir. Bu pilot çalışmada, düşük doz lokal anestezik ve opioid kombinasyonu ile yapılan kaudal anestezinin transrektal prostat biyopsisi sırasında kullanımının etkinliğini ve güvenirliği araştırıldı. Atatürk Üniversitesi Hastanesi Üroloji Kliniğinde prostat spesifik antijen yüksekliği veya rektal incelemede özelliği olması nedeniyle 50 hastaya transrektal ultrosonografi eşliğinde 12-16 kadran prostat iğne biyopsisi yapıldı. Bütün hastalara işlemden 20 dakika önce 15 mL 50 µgr fentanil içeren %0.1'lik bupivakain solüsyonu kaudal olarak enjekte edildi. Hastaların ağrı skorları vizüel analog skala (VAS) prob girişi, probun hareketi ve biyopsi sırasındaki iğne girişi için ayrı ayrı değerlendirildi. Motor blok ise Bromage skalası ile değerlendirildi. VAS skoru işlemin tüm aşamalarında 0-2 arasında değerlendirildi. 0, 1 ve 2'lik VAS skorlarının dağılımı, prob girişi sırasındaki sırasıyla 24 (%48), 24 (%48) ve 2 (%4); prob hareketleri sırasında 34 (%68), 14 (%28) ve 2 (%4) ve biyopsi alımı sırasında ise 30 (%60), 14 (%28) ve 2 (%4) olarak gerçekleşti. Hasta memnuniyetinin dağılımı kötü 1 (%2), iyi 12 (%24) ve çok iyi 37(%74) şeklinde idi. Bromage skalası tüm hastalarda 0 olarak saptandı Üç hastada idrar retansiyonu gelişti. TRUS eşliğinde yapılan tru-cut prostat biyopsisi işleminden önce düşük konsantrasyonlu lokal anestezik ve opioid kombinasyonu ile yapılan kaudal anestezinin ağrıyı önlemede etkili ve güvenilir bir yöntemdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAPANOĞLU, T., ERDEM, A. F., CESUR, M., AKSOY, Y., ÖZBEY, İ., POLAT, Ö. (2006). Efficacy and safety of caudal anaesthesia performed with 0.1% bupivacain in transrectal ultrasography-guided prostate biopsy. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3, 411–415. https://ajindex.com/articles/328380

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aus G, Damber JE, Hugosson J: Prostate biopsy and anaesthesia: An overview. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 39: 124-129, 2005
  2. Vanni AP, Schaal CH, Costa RP, et al: Is the periprostatic anesthetic blockade advantageous in ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Int Braz J Urol. 30: 114-188, 2004
  3. Ragavan N, Philip J, Balasubramanian SP, et al: A randomized, controlled trial comparing lidocaine periprostatic nerve block, diclofenac suppository and both for transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of prostate. J Urol. 174: 510-513, 2005
  4. Turgut AT, Ergun E, Kosar U, et al: Sedation as an alternative method to lessen patient discomfort due to transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy. Eur J Radiol. 57: 148-153, 2006
  5. Adsan O, Inal G, Ozdogan L, et al: Unilateral pudendal nerve blockade for relief of all pain during transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Urology. 64: 528-531, 2004
  6. Clements R, Aideyan OU, Griffiths GJ, et al: Side effects and patient acceptability of transrectal biopsy of the prostate. Clin Radiol. 47: 125-126, 1993
  7. Collins GN, Lloyd SN, Hehir M, et al: Multiple transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsies--true morbidity and patient acceptance. Br J Urol. 71: 460-463, 1993
  8. İnal G, Yazıcı S, Koşan M, et al: Transrektal ultrasonografi eşliğinde prostat biyopsisi öncesi 2 Ml ve 6 Ml periprostatik %1 lidokain enjeksiyonunun karşılaştırılması. Türk Üroloji Dergisi. 30: 173-177, 2004
  9. Vaidya A, Soloway MS: Periprostatic local anesthesia before ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: An update of the Miami experience. Eur Urol. 40: 135-138, 2001
  10. Rodriguez A, Kyriakou G, Leray E, et al: Prospective study comparing two methods of anaesthesia for prostate biopsies: apex periprostatic nerve block versus intrarectal lidocaine gel: Review of the literature. Eur Urol. 44: 195- 200, 2003
  11. Scott J, Huskisson EC: Graphic representation ofpain. Pain. 2: 175-7, 1976
  12. Horinaga M, Nakashima J, Nakanoma T: Efficacy compared between caudal block and periprostatic local anesthesia for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy. Urology. 68: 348-51, 2006
  13. Ivani G: Caudal block: the 'no turn technique’. Paediatr Anaesth. 15: 83-84, 2005
  14. Sharpe P, Klein JR, Thompson JP, et al: Analgesia for circumcision in a pediatric population: Comparison of caudal bupivacaine alone with bupivacaine plus two doses of clonidine. Paediatr Anaesth. 11: 695-700, 2001. 15