SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika / 2011 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 26

From ‘Eurosclerosis’ to ‘Eurosteoporoz’: End of the civil power notion of European Union

" Eurosclerosis'ten 'Eurosteoporoz'a: Avrupa Birliği'nin uygar güç nosyonunun sonu

Necip Murat ARMAN
Pages
87–106
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This situation has created a Eurosteoporoz in the structure of the European Union.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:European Union is defined as a civil power by several authors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This process suffered a standstill after the 1973 oil crisis and a recession period has experienced which is called as Eurosclerosis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This situation has created a Eurosteoporoz in the structure of the European Union.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

European Union is defined as a civil power by several authors. That term refers to the usage of economic instruments and diplomacy rather than mili- tary options in terms of problem-solving skills. This process suffered a standstill after the 1973 oil crisis and a recession period has experienced which is called as Eurosclerosis. Civil power is based on sociological basis, moreover it is accepted that the motivation which is necessary for the implementation of these policies is available in the social and political culture of the peoples of the European Union. However the approach of civil power is being criticized especially after September 11. In this study, it is claimed that the EU has began to lose both the norms that construct its identity and notion of being a civil power after the 2004 and 2007 enlargements. This situation has created a Eurosteoporoz in the structure of the European Union.

Özet

Avrupa Birliği kimi düşünürler tarafından bir uygar güç olarak tanımlan- maktadır. Bu kavram sorun çözme becerisi anlamında askeri seçenekler- den ziyade ekonomik enstrümanların ve diplomasinin ön plana çıkmasını ifade eder. Bu süreç, 1973 petrol krizi sonrası sekteye uğramış ve Euroscle- rosis olarak tanımlanan bir durgunluk dönemi yaşanmıştır. Uygar güç so- syolojik bir temele dayanır ve bu politikaların uygulanabilmesi için gerekli motivasyonun Avrupa Birliği’nin halklarının sahip olduğu sosyal ve si- yasal kültürde mevcut olduğu kabul edilir. Ancak uygar güç yaklaşımı özellikle 11 Eylül’den sonra sıkça eleştirilmeye başlanmıştır. Bu çalışmada Avrupa Birliği’nin 2004 ve 2007 genişlemelerinden sonra kimliğini oluş- turan normları ve Avrupa Birliği’nin uygar güç olma nosyonunu kaybet- meye başladığı iddia edilmektedir. Bu durum Avrupa Birliği’nin yapısında bir Eurosteoporoz meydana getirmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARMAN, N. M. (2011). From ‘Eurosclerosis’ to ‘Eurosteoporoz’: End of the civil power notion of European Union. Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 26, 87–106. https://ajindex.com/articles/322286

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Aggestam, Lisbeth, ‘Introduction: Ethical Power Europe?’, International Affairs, Vol. 84, No.1, 2008, s. 1-11.
  2. Ashley, Richard K., ‘The Poverty of Neorealism,’ International Organization, Vol. 38, No. 2, 1984, s. 225-286.
  3. Bellamy, Alex J., ‘Humanitarian Intervention’, içinde Alan Collins, Contemporary Security Studies, (Oxford: Oxford Press, 2007), s. 359-377.
  4. Bentolila, Samuel ve Guiseppe Bertola, ‘Firing Costs and Labour Demand: How Bad is Eurosclerosis?’, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 57, 1990, s. 381-402.
  5. Breuss, Fritz, ‘An Evaluation of the EU’s Fifth Enlargement with Special Focus on Bulgaria and Romania’, içinde F. Keereman ve I. Szekely (der.), Five Years of an Enlarged EU, (Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 2010), s. 221-248.
  6. Bull, Hedley, ‘Civilian Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 21, No. 2, Aralık 1982, s. 149–170.
  7. Carr, Edward, The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919-1939, (New York: Perennial, 2001). Center for Strategic and International Studies Commission on Smart Power, A Smarter, More Secure America, (Washington, D.C.: CSIS, 2007).
  8. Deutsch, Karl W., Sidney A. Burrell ve Robert A. Kann, Political Community and the North Atlantic Areas: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957). Deutsch Karl W., ‘Security Community’, içinde James N. Rosenau (der.), International Politic and Foreign Polity, (New York: Free Press, 1961).
  9. Dahl, Robert A., ‘The Concept of Power’, Behavioral Science, Vol. 2, No. 3, Temmuz 1957, s. 201-215. Duchêne, François, ‘Europe’s Role in World Peace’, içinde Richard Mayne (der.) Europe Tomorrow: Sixteen Europeans Look Ahead, (London: Fontana, 1972). Duchêne François, ‘The European Community and the Uncertainties of Interdependence’, içinde M. Kohnstamm, W. Hager (der.) A Nation Writ Large? Foreign Policy Problems before the European Community, (Macmillan: Basingstoke, 1973).
  10. Falkner, Gerda ve Oliver Treib, ‘Three Worlds of Compliance or Four? The EU-15 Compared to New Member States’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 2008, Vol. 46. No. 2, 2008, s. 293–313.
  11. Fox, William, The Super-Powers: The United States, Britain, and the Soviet Union, Their Responsibility for Peace, (Harcourt: Brace a. Co, 1944).
  12. Freres, Christian, ‘The European Union as Global Civil Power: Development Cooperation in EU–Latin American Relations’, Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2000, s. 63–86.
  13. Frey, Frederick