Journals / Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika / 2010 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 21

Turkish foreing policy ( 1971-1980 ) : İdeologies vs.Realities

Pages
61–100
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A special emphasis will be placed on the Cyprus Crisis, the disappointment with the United States and the EC and their effect on Turkish foreign policy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:With the 9T coup, a leftist government headed by Bülent Ecevit came to power.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, Turkish foreign policy in the 9TQs was not only shaped by one ideology, but was rather affected by a multitude of ideologies, from the left to radical Islam.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A special emphasis will be placed on the Cyprus Crisis, the disappointment with the United States and the EC and their effect on Turkish foreign policy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Türkiye · Turkey

Abstract

With the 9T coup, a leftist government headed by Bülent Ecevit came to power. Although he called his foreign policy 'Kemalist', Ecevit's idealist, leftist foreign policy understanding ran counter to Atatürk's pragmatist, realist and communism-sceptic foreign policy approach. With his Islamist partner, Necmettin Erbakan, Ecevit deviated from the Republican orthodoxy. This orientation constituted a dramatic shift in Turkish foreign policy in terms of both ideology and practices. However, Turkish foreign policy in the 9TQs was not only shaped by one ideology, but was rather affected by a multitude of ideologies, from the left to radical Islam. In what follows, this article will look at the ideological changes in the main political groups—the leftist-Kemalists, the justice Party and the Islamists—before examining the foreign policy implementation. A special emphasis will be placed on the Cyprus Crisis, the disappointment with the United States and the EC and their effect on Turkish foreign policy.

Özet

1971 'Darbesi'yle Bülent Ecevit'in başkanlığında yeni bir hükümet yönetimi üstlendi. Her ne kadar kendi dış politikasını 'Kemalist' olarak adlandırsa da, E cevit'in romantik idealist, solcu dış politika anlayışı Atatürk'ün faydacı, gerçekçi, komünizme kuşkuyla yaklaşan, kendisini daha çok merkezde konumlandıran vs. dış politika anlayışına önemli oranda ters düşmekteydi. Ecevit, ortağı Necmettin Erbakan'la klasik Cumhuriyetçi dış politikadan kayda değer bir ölçüde ayrıldı. Bu yönelim Türk dış politikasında ideoloji ve uygulamalar anlamında çarpıcı bir yön değişikliğine neden olmuştur. Ancak, 1970'lerdeki Türk dış politikasını şekillendiren tek bir ideoloji değildi. Geçmiş dönemlerden farklı olarak, dış politika sol eğilimli ideolojilerden radikal İslamcı ve Türkçü eğitimli ideolojilere kadar birçok farklı ideolojinin bir araya gelmesinden etkilenerek oluştu. İdeolojik tartışmalara ek olarak makale, Kıbrıs çıkartması, haşhaş krizi, silah ambargosu gibi dönemin önemli gelişmelerini de dış politikanın iç kaynakları ve fikirsel dönüşümü çerçevesinde irdeliyor.

🔖

Cite This Article

LAÇİNER, S. (2010). Turkish foreing policy ( 1971-1980 ) : İdeologies vs.Realities. Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 21, 61–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/322131

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. Ahmad, Feroz, TheTurkish Experiment in Democracy, 1950-1975, (London: C. Hurst, 1977).
  2. Ahmad, Feroz, The Making of Modern Turkey, (London: Routledge, 1996).
  3. Alasya, H. Fikret, Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti Tarihi, (The History of the Republic of the Northern Cyprus), (Ankara: Türk Kültürünü Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayınları, 1987).
  4. Alkan, Türker, 'The National Salvation Party in Turkey', in Metin Heper and Raphael Israeli (eds.), Islam and Politics in the Modern Middle East, (London: Croom Helm, 1984).
  5. Armaoğlu, Fahir, 'Türk Dış Politikasi' (Turkish Foreign Policy) in 20 Yüzyıl Siyasi Tarihi, 1914-1980, (20th Century Political History, 1914-1980), (Ankara: Türkiye İş Bankası, 1983).
  6. Attaides, Micheal, Cyprus: Nationalism and International Politics, (Edinburg: Q Press, 1979).
  7. Aykan, Mahmut Bali, 'The Palestinian Question in Turkish Foreign Policy from the 1950s to the 1990s',
  8. IJMES, Vol. 25, 1993.
  9. Aykan, Mahmut Bali, Turkey's Role in the Organisation of the Islamic Conference, 1960-1992, (New York: Vantage Press, 1994).
  10. Aykan, Mahmut Bali, 'The OIC and Turkey's Cyprus Cause', in Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, (Ankara University), 1995,
  11. Vol. XXV. Bal, İhsan, Preventing Terrorism in Democracies: The Case of Turkey, unpublished PhD. thesis, University of Leicester, 1999.
  12. Banoglu Niyazi Ahmet, Kıbrıs Dosyası (The Cyprus File), (Istanbul: Kervan Yayınları). Barchard, David, Turkey and the West, (London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1985).
  13. Batur, Muhsin, Anılar ve Görüşler: Üç Dönemin Perde Arkası (Memoirs and Ideas: The Hidden Side of the Three Periods), (Istanbul: Milliyet Yayınları, 1985).
  14. Birand, Mehmet Ali, Türkiye'nin Ortak Pazar Macerası: 1959-1985, (Turkey's Common Market Adventure), (Istanbul: Milliyet, 1985).
  15. Boll, Micheal, 'Turkey Between East and West: The Regional Alternative', World Today, Vol. 35, No. 9, 1979.
  16. Boll, M. M., 'Turkey's New National Security Concept: What It Means for NATO', Orbis, Vol. 23, No. 3, Fall 1979.
  17. Borowiec, Andrew, The Mediterranean Feud, (New York: Praeger, 1983).
  18. Bruden, David, 'Ford Endorses Bill to Ease Arms Embargo on Turkey', New York Times, 10 July 1975.
  19. Camp, Glen D., 'Greek-Turkish Conflict over Cyprus', Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 95, 1980.
  20. Campany, Richard C., Turkey and the United States: The Arms Embargo Period, (Praeger Publishers, 1986).
  21. Cem, İsmail, Tarih Açısından 12 Mart (March 12 From The Angle of History), (Istanbul: Cem Yayınları, 1980).
  22. Clymer, Adam, 'House, By 208-205, Vote