Journals / Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi / 2013 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1

A research on the relationship of charismatic leadership behaviors of agricultural cooperative managers with cooperation of sharehoders and performance-satisfactions

Tarımsal kooperatif yöneticilerin karizmatik liderlik davranışları ile ortakların işbirliği ve performans-tatminleri arasındaki ilişkiye yönelik bir araştırma

Pages
49–72
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The analysis results demonstrated that the charismatic leadership of the cooperative managers impacted the sharehoders' commitments to each other, the cooperation between shareholders, and the satisfaction expressed through shareholder performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the effects of charismatic leadership qualities of managers in agricultural cooperatives were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research data was collected from 155 shareholder of ÇUKOBIRLIK operating in the eastern Mediterranean via a questionnaire.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The analysis results demonstrated that the charismatic leadership of the cooperative managers impacted the sharehoders' commitments to each other, the cooperation between shareholders, and the satisfaction expressed through shareholder performance.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the effects of charismatic leadership qualities of managers in agricultural cooperatives were investigated. A model representing the relationship between the variables was established and the hypotheses were tested. The validity and reliability analyses for the model were performed, finding that these criteria were met. The research data was collected from 155 shareholder of ÇUKOBIRLIK operating in the eastern Mediterranean via a questionnaire. The data was analyzed by a partial least square structural equation modeling method (PLS-SEM). The analysis results demonstrated that the charismatic leadership of the cooperative managers impacted the sharehoders' commitments to each other, the cooperation between shareholders, and the satisfaction expressed through shareholder performance. It was found that the commitment of shareholders to each other affected cooperation amongst themselves significantly. In addition, the research model explained the high level of shareholder performance- satisfaction as well as cooperation between the shareholders variables

Özet

Bu çalışmada, tarımsal kooperatiflerde yöneticilerin karizmatik liderlik özelliklerinin sonuçlarına yönelik bir araştırma yapılmıştır. Araştırma da değişkenlerin aralarındaki ilişkileri gösteren bir model oluşturularak, hipotezler test edilmiştir. Modelin geçerlilik ve güvenirlilik analizleri yapılarak, bu kriterleri karşıladığı görülmüştür. Araştırma verileri Doğu Akdeniz’de faaliyette bulunan ÇUKOBİRLİĞİN 155 ortağından anket yöntemiyle toplanmıştır. Veriler kısmı en küçük kareler yöntemi (PLS= Partial Least Squares) ile analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda kooperatif yöneticilerinin karizmatik liderlik özelliklerinin ortakların birbirlerine bağlılığı, ortaklar arasında işbirliği ve ortak performas-tatminlerini etkilediği bulunmuştur. Ortakların birbirlerine olan bağlılıkları, işbirliğini güçlü bir şekilde etkilediği görülmüştür. Araştırma modeli, ortak performans-tatmin değişkenini ve ortaklar arasındaki işbirliğini yüksek düzeyde açıklamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİLGİN, N., KUZEY, C. (2013). A research on the relationship of charismatic leadership behaviors of agricultural cooperative managers with cooperation of sharehoders and performance-satisfactions. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1, 49–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/320220

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Alliston, J. G. and Diaz, F. (2005). Leadershıpın a ChangıngAgrıcultureın UK,Internatıonal Farm Management Assocıatıon (IFMA),15th Congress - 2005 Brazil. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/24279/1/cp05al01.pdf,(19-11-2011).
  2. Banaszak, I. ve Beckmann, V. (2006). The Role of Leadership in the Process of Establishing and Sustaining Cooperation, Working Paper, Integrated Development of Agricultural and Rural Institutions QLRT-2001-02718,
  3. Humboldt Universty, Division of Resource Economics, Berlin, Germany. Bass, Bernerd, M. (1997). Does the Transactional- Transformational Leadership Paradigm Transcend Organizational and National Boundaries?, AmericanPsychologist, Vol. 52, No: 2, 130-139.
  4. Barcla, D., Higgins C., Thompson R. (1995). The Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration, Technology Studies, Vol. 2 (2), 285-309.
  5. Berson, Y., Shamair, B., Avolio, B. J., Popper, M. 2001. The relationship between vision strength, leadership style and context. The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 12 (2001), 53–73.
  6. Bollen, K., Hoyle, R. (1990). Perceived Cohesion: A Conceptual and Empirical Examination. Social Forcel, Vol. 69, 479-504.
  7. Borgen, Svein, O. (2001). Identification as a Trust-Generating Mechanism in Cooperatives, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Vol.72(2), 209- 228. Cook, Michael, L. (1995). TheFuture of U.S. AgriculturalCooperatives: A Neo-Institutional Approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 77(5), 1153-1159.
  8. Cook, Michael, L. (1994). The Role of Management Behavior in Agricultural Cooperatives. Journal of Agricultural Cooperation, Vol. 9, 42-58.
  9. Campion, M., A., Medsker, G., J., Hıggs, A., C. (1993). Relatıons Between Work Group Characterıstıcs And Effectıveness: Implıcatıons For Desıgnıng Effectıve Work Groups. Personnel Psychology, Vol. 46, 823- 850. Chin, W., W. (1998). Issue and Opinions on Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, 39-50.
  10. Conger, J., A., Kanungo, R., N., Menon S. (2000). Charismatic Leadership and Follower Effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 21, 747-767.
  11. Conger, J., A., Kanungo, R,. N., Menon, S,. T., Mathur, P. (1997). Measuring Charisma: Dimensionality and Validity of the Conger–Kanungo Scale of Charismatic Leadership. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 14, 290- 302. Cropp, R. (2005).
  12. CooperativELeadershıp, University of Wisconsin Center for C