SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi / 2020 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 2

The Relationship between Organizational Commitment and Turnover Intention: Moderating Effect of Transformational Leadership

Örgütsel Bağlılık ve İşten Ayrılma Niyeti İlişkisi: Dönüşümcü Liderliğin Düzenleyici Etkisi

NURCAN ALKIŞ
Murat Tahir ÇALDAĞ
Hakkı Okan YELOĞLU
Pages
880–892
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the analysis, there is a significant negative relationship between organizational commitment and turnover intention.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to investigate the moderator effect of transformational leadership in the relationship between organizational commitment and turnover intention.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 206 employees from different sectors were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the analysis, there is a significant negative relationship between organizational commitment and turnover intention.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the moderator effect of transformational leadership in the relationship between organizational commitment and turnover intention. A total of 206 employees from different sectors were included in the study. Data collection method was selected as questionnaire. Correlation and regression analyzes were performed with the SPSS program with the aim of testing the hypotheses. According to the results of the analysis, there is a significant negative relationship between organizational commitment and turnover intention. Another finding of the study is that, transformational leadership has a moderator effect on the relationship between organizational commitment and turnover intention.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı örgütsel bağlılık ve işten ayrılma niyeti arasındaki ilişkide dönüşümcü liderliğin düzenleyici etkisini araştırmaktır. Çalışmaya farklı sektörlerden toplamda 206 çalışan dâhil edilmiştir. Veri toplama yöntemi olarak anket uygulanmıştır. Hipotezleri test edebilmek için, SPSS programı ile korelasyon ve regresyon analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre örgütsel bağlılık ile işten ayrılma niyeti arasında anlamlı negatif yönlü bir ilişki vardır. Çalışmanın bir başka bulgusuna göre de dönüşümcü liderliğin örgütsel bağlılık ve işten ayrılma niyeti arasındaki ilişkiye düzenleyici etkisi vardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALKIŞ, N., ÇALDAĞ, M. T., YELOĞLU, H. O. (2020). The Relationship between Organizational Commitment and Turnover Intention: Moderating Effect of Transformational Leadership. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 2, 880–892. https://ajindex.com/articles/320067

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991).
  2. Theory of planned behavior, Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50, 197-211.
  3. Akça, B. (2012). Dönüşümcü Liderlik İle Örgütsel Bağlılık, İş Tatmini ve İşten Ayrılma Niyeti Arasındaki İlişkilerde Örgütsel Adaletin Rolü: İSO İşletmelerinde Bir Araştırma, Doktora Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Adana. Al Khajeh, E. H. (2018). Impact of leadership styles on organizational performance. Journal of Human Resources Management Research, 2018, 1-10.
  4. Allen, N. J., ve Meyer, J. P. (1990). The Measurement And Antecedents Of Affective, Continuance And Normative Commitment To The Organization. Journal Of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
  5. Anderson, M. H., & Sun, P. Y. (2017). Reviewing leadership styles: Overlaps and the need for a new ‘full‐range’theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 76-96.
  6. Arnold, H.J. and Feldman, D.C. (1982). A multivariate analysis of the determinants of job turnover, Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(3),350-360.
  7. Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational dynamics, 18(3), 19-31.
  8. Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 8(1), 9-32.
  9. Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. (1979). The Michigan organizational assessment questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Carless, S. A., Wearing, A. J., & Mann, L. (2000). A short measure of transformational leadership. Journal of business and psychology, 14(3), 389-405.
  10. Chiu, R. and Francesco, A. (2003). Dispositional traits and turnover intention: Examining the mediating role of job satisfaction and affective commitment, International Journal of Manpower, 24 (3), 284-298. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720310479741 Díaz-Sáenz, H. ( 2011 ) Transformational leadership. In A. Bryman, D. Collinson, K. Grint, B. Jackson and Uhl-Bien, M. (Eds), The SAGE Handbook of Leadership. London: SAGE, pp. 299 – 310. Doğan, S., Kılıç, S. (2007). Örgütsel bağlılığın sağlanmasında personel güçlendirmenin yeri ve önemi. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 29, 37-61.
  11. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: SAGE. Gravetter, F., & Wallnau, L. (2014). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Herman, H. M., Huang, X., & Lam, W. (2013