Journals / Selçuk Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilim Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3

The segmental Body Composition comparison of Freestyle and Greco-Roman style wrestlers with Bioelectrical impedance method

Serbest ve Grekoromen güreşçilerin Bioelektrik impadans yöntemi ile vücut kompozisyonunun karşılaştırılması

Pages
340–343
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: the implementation of sport- style on wrestlers is a slight change in body composition.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The purpose of this study is to determine the differences between freestyle and Greco-Roman style wrestlers’ body composition as segmental.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Freestyle wrestlers (n=23) and Greco-Roman wrestlers (n=23) attended in this study .
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: the implementation of sport- style on wrestlers is a slight change in body composition.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study is to determine the differences between freestyle and Greco-Roman style wrestlers&#8217; body composition as segmental. Material and method: This study was conducted during the Senior National Camping preparatory camp. Freestyle wrestlers (n=23) and Greco-Roman wrestlers (n=23) attended in this study . As segmental, right and left arms, legs and trunk percentage of fat and fat free mass were assessed by using a Bioelectrical Impedance analyzer (Tanita Body Composition Analyzer BC- 418). However, Atago Refractometer pen device was used to determine levels of hydration. All measurements (right and left arms, legs and trunk) were compared by using independent t-test statistics (P<0.05). Results: there was only statistically significant differences among %fat and fat free mass between 74 and 84 kilogram Freestyle and Greco-Roman Style Wrestlers&#8217; body Composition segmental analyze (P>0.05). Conclusion: the implementation of sport- style on wrestlers is a slight change in body composition.

Özet

Amacı: Grekoromen ve Serbest güreşçilerin vücut kompozisyonunun segmental olarak analizinin yapılarak farklılıkların belirlenmesidir. Yöntem Bu çalışma, Büyükler Dünya Şampiyonası öncesi hazırlık kampında yapılmıştır. Çalışmaya, Serbest (n=23) ve Grekoromen stil (n=23) güreşçiler katılmıştır. Çalışmada, tüm güreşçilerden Bioelektrik Impedans (BIA) analizörü kullanım protokolüne uygun olarak güreşçilerin sağ ve sol kol, bacak ve gövde yağ yüzdeleri (YY) ve yağsız vücut kütleleri (YVK) segmental olarak belirlendi. Hidrasyon seviyelerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla refractometre cihazı kullanıldı. Alınan tüm ölçümler (sağ ve sol kol, bacak ve gövde YY ve YVK) bağımsız t-test istatistikleri kullanılarak karşılaştırıldı (P 0.05). Sonuç: Sporun uygulanış tarzı güreşçiler üzerinde az da olsa vücut kompozisyonun da değişim oluşturmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRKAN, E., KUTLU, M., KOZ, M. (2011). The segmental Body Composition comparison of Freestyle and Greco-Roman style wrestlers with Bioelectrical impedance method. Selçuk Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilim Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 340–343. https://ajindex.com/articles/317751

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Bartok C, Schoeller DA, Randall CR, Sullivan JC, Landry GL. The effect of dehydration on wrestling minimum weight assessment, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2004; Jan; 36(1):160–7
  2. Clark RR, Oppliger RA, Sullivan JC. Cross-validation of the NCAA method to predict body fat for minimum weight in collegiate wrestlers, Clin J Sport Med, 2002; Sep; 12(5):285–90
  3. Heyward VH, Stolarczyk LM. Applied body composition assessment human kinetics, 1996; chapter 1:p 1–9, chapter 2: p 21–43, chapter 3: p 43– 55
  4. Kravitz L, Heyward VH. Fitness assessment part 4, Body composition personel trainer, 1997; 8(5): 19–23
  5. Luttermoser G, Gochenour D, Allen FS. Determining a minimum wrestling weight for interscholastic wrestlers, Journal of Family Practice, 1999; march 48(3): 208
  6. Mirzaei B, Curby DG, Rahmani-Nia F, Moghadasi M. Physiological profile of elite iranian junior freestyle wrestlers. J Strength Cond Res, 2009; 23(8): 2339–2344
  7. Oppliger RA, Bartok. C. Hydration testing of athletes, Sports Med, 2002; 32 (15): 952- 971
  8. Rahmani Nia, F, Mirzaei B, Nuri R. Physiological Profile Of Elite İranian Junior Greco-Roman Wrestlers. I.J. Fitness, 2007; 3(2): 49-54
  9. Stuempfle K J, Drury DG. Comparison of 3 methods to assess urine specific gravity in collegiate wrestlers, J Athl Train, 2003; Oct–Dec; 38(4): 315–319
  10. Utter AC. The new National Collegiate Athletic Association wrestling weight certification program and sport-seasonal changes in body composition of college wrestlers, J Strength Cond Res, 2001; Aug; 15(3): 296–301
  11. Utter AC, Scott JR, Oppliger RA, Visich PS, Goss FL, Marks BL, Nieman DC, Smith BW. A comparison of leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance and skinfolds in assessing body fat in collegiate wrestlers, J Strength Cond Res, 2001; May;15(2):157–60
  12. Utter AC, Goss FL, Swan PD, Harrıs GS, Robertson RJ, Trone GA. Evaluation of Air Displacement For Assessing Body Composition Of Collegiate Wrestlers. Med Sci Sports Exerc Mar, 2003; 35(3):500– 5
  13. Utter AC, Nieman DC, Mulford GJ, Tobin R, Schumm S, Mcinnis T, Monk JR. Evaluation of legto- leg BIA in assessing body composition of highschool wrestlers, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2005; 37(8):1395–400
  14. Utter AC, McAnulty SR, Sarvazyan A, Query MC, Landram MJ. Evaluation of ultrasound velocity to assess the hydration status of wrestlers, J Strength Cond Res,2010; Jun;24(6):1451-7
  15. Yoon J. Physiological Profiles of Elite Senior Wrestlers. Sports Med, 2002; 32 (4): 225-233
  16. Wrestling Minimum W