Journals / Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Ekonomik büyüme ve demokratikleşme arasındaki ilişkinin analizi: Ampirik bir uygulama (Türkiye örneği)

An analysis of relation between economic growth and democratization: An empiric application (A sample of Turkey)

Pages
123–132
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results show that there is a long run relationship between civil rights liberties, political liberties, population growth rate and GDP growth rate.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to analyze the relation between democratization and economic growth in Turkey, using time series data from 1980 to 2006.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results show that there is a long run relationship between civil rights liberties, political liberties, population growth rate and GDP growth rate.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is also found out that there is a unidirectional causality from civil rights and political liberties to GDP growth rate.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the relation between democratization and economic growth in Turkey, using time series data from 1980 to 2006. In the scope of this aim, an econometric application was held by using co-integration analyses and causality test in which the civil rights and liberties, politic liberties, and growth of population are added the model as an independent variables, and Gross Domestic Production (GDP) as a dependent variable. Results show that there is a long run relationship between civil rights liberties, political liberties, population growth rate and GDP growth rate. It is also found out that there is a unidirectional causality from civil rights and political liberties to GDP growth rate.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye’de demokratikleşme ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki nasıl bir ilişki olduğunu incelemektir. Bu amaç çerçevesinde öncelikle literatürde yapılmış olan çalışmalar titizlikle irdelenmiştir. Türkiye için eşbütünleşme analizi ve granger nedensellik testlerinin uygulandığı ekonometrik bir çalışma yapılmış ve bu uygulamada sivil hak ve özgürlükler, politik özgürlükler ve nüfus artışı bağımsız değişken, ekonomik büyümeyi temsil eden GSYİH büyüme hızı ise bağımlı değişken olarak modelde yer almıştır. Yapılan analiz sonucunda sivil haklar, nüfus büyüme hızı, politik özgürlükler ve ekonomik büyüme arasında uzun dönemli bir ilişki tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca sivil haklar ve politik özgürlüklerden ekonomik büyümeye doğru tek yönlü bir nedensellik ilişkisinin olduğu gözlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMIRKAN, E., KAYA, V. (2022). Ekonomik büyüme ve demokratikleşme arasındaki ilişkinin analizi: Ampirik bir uygulama (Türkiye örneği). Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 123–132. https://ajindex.com/articles/647441

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. ALESINA, A., Özler, S., Roubini, N., Swagel, P. (1996), “Political Instability and Economic Growth”, Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 189-211.
  2. ARAT, Z. F. (1988), “Democracy and Economic Development: Modernization Theory Revisite”, Comparative Politics, 21 (1), 21–36.
  3. BARRO, ROBERT J. (1996), “Democracy and Growth”, Journal of Economic Growth, 1 (1), 1-27.
  4. BAŞAR, S ve Yıldız, Ş. (2009), “The Effects of Economic Growth on Democratization”, Balıkesir University SSE Journal, 12 (21). BESLEY, T., S. Coate ve T.W. Guinnane (2004), “Incentives, Information, and Welfare: England’s New Poor Law and the Workhouse Test”, Edt. T.W. Guinnane, W.A. Sundstrom ve W.C. Whatley, in History Matters Essays on Economic Growth, Technology, and Demographic Change, Stanford University Press,
  5. Stanford, CA. BOIX, C., Stokes, S. C. (2003), “Endogenous Democratization”, World Politics, 55, 517-49.
  6. BURKHART, R. E., Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1994), “Comparative Democracy: The Economic Development Thesis”, American Political Science Review, 88 (4), 903–10. Civil Rights and Politic Liberties, http://www.freedomhouse.org/ template.cfm?page= 439 (05.01.2012).
  7. COLARESI, M., Thompson, W. R. (2003), “The Economic Development – Democratization Relationship”, Coparative Political Studies, (36),4, 381–94.
  8. COLEMAN, J. S. (1960), “Conclusion: The Political Systems of The Developing Area”, in Almond, G. A., Coleman, J. S., eds., The Politics of Developing Areas, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 532-81’den aktaran Arat, Z. F. (1988) “Democracy and Development: Modernization Theory Revisited”, Comparative Politics, Vol.21, No.1, 22. CUTRIGHT, P. (1963), “National Political Development: Measurement and Analysis”, American Sociological Review, 28, 253–64. ERRSON,S, and Jane-E. Lane (1996), “Democracy and Development: Statistical Exploration”, in A. Leftwich, Democracy and Development, 45-73.
  9. GASIOROWSKI, M.J. (2000), “Democracy and Macroeconomic Performance in Underdeveloped Countries: An Empirical Analysis”, Comparative Political Studies, 33 (3), 59-75.
  10. GHALI, B., vd, (2003), The Interaction Between Democracy and Development, UNESCO, Paris. HELLIWELL, J. F. (1992), “Empirical Linkages Between Democracy and Economic Growth”, NBER Working Paper, No: 4066. JACKMAN, R. W. (1973), “On the Relation of Economic Development to Democratic Performance”, American Journal of Political Science, 17 (3), 611–21.
  11. KIM, C. L. (1971) “Socio-Economic Development and Political Democracy in Japanese Prefectures”, The America