Journals / Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

AN ELECTORAL SYSTEM WHICH REWARDS THE WINNER ONCE AGAIN: THE MAJORITY PRIZE SYSTEM

KAZANANIN BİR KEZ DAHA ÖDÜLLENDİRİLDİĞİ SEÇİM SİSTEMİ: ÇOĞUNLUK ÖDÜLLÜ SEÇİM SİSTEMİ

Pages
1773–1811
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study has tried to facilitate better recognition of this electoral system through examining its practical outcomes in the light of the analyses conducted based on the data obtained from the countries where this electoral system is in effect.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Political parties are in continual pursuit of updating the election procedures with a view to keeping functional or effective the politics of their country.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This electoral system can be defined, as most concisely as possible, as the system in which a party rewarded with the highest number of votes from the electorate is rewarded once more with prize seats by the electoral system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study has tried to facilitate better recognition of this electoral system through examining its practical outcomes in the light of the analyses conducted based on the data obtained from the countries where this electoral system is in effect.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Political parties are in continual pursuit of updating the election procedures with a view to keeping functional or effective the politics of their country. Sometimes the underlying reason behind such updates might be the concern of not losing the power. On the other hand, these updates can occasionally stem from a necessity and become imperative. Frequently experienced political instabilities and dead-locks can lead to a reform in electoral systems which is injustice in representation. One of the electoral systems which make concessions to justice in representation for the sake of stability in government is the majority bonus system. This electoral system can be defined, as most concisely as possible, as the system in which a party rewarded with the highest number of votes from the electorate is rewarded once more with prize seats by the electoral system. This study has tried to facilitate better recognition of this electoral system through examining its practical outcomes in the light of the analyses conducted based on the data obtained from the countries where this electoral system is in effect.

Özet

Siyasi partiler, seçimler aracılığıyla iktidara sahip/ortak olarak veya en azından mecliste temsil edilerek seçmenlere vermiş oldukları sözleri yerine getirme gayre-ti içerisinde olan yapılardır. Siyasi yarış içerisinde olan bu yapılar, ülke siyaseti-nin işler hale getirilmesi veya etkinleştirilmesi için sürekli seçim usullerini güncelleme arzusu içerisinde olurlar. Bu güncellemelerin arkasında kimi zaman iktidarı kaybetmeme düşüncesi yatmaktadır. Ancak kimi zamanlarda bu güncelleme ihtiyacı bir zorunluluk haline gelmektedir. Siyasi istikrarsızlıkların ve tıkanıklıkların sıklıkla görülmesi, seçim sistemlerinde temsilde adalet aleyhine olacak şekilde bir reforma gidilmesine yol açmaktadır. Yönetimde istikrar için temsilde adaletten taviz veren seçim sistemlerinden birisi de çoğunluk ödüllü seçim sistemidir. Bu seçim sistemini en öz şekilde, seçmenden en yüksek oyu alarak ödüllendirilen bir partinin, bir de seçim sistemi tarafından ödüllendirilerek ilave milletvekili aldığı sistem şeklinde tanımlamak mümkündür. Bu çalışmada, bu seçim sisteminin uygulandığı ülkelerdeki verilerden hareketle yapılan analizler ile seçim sisteminin ne gibi sonuçlar doğurduğu irdelenerek sistemin daha yakından tanınmasına çalışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEKİN, A. (2021). AN ELECTORAL SYSTEM WHICH REWARDS THE WINNER ONCE AGAIN: THE MAJORITY PRIZE SYSTEM. Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 1773–1811. https://ajindex.com/articles/317365

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. AA, "Hollanda'da 200 gündür hükümet kurulamadı", https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/dunya/hollandada-200-gundur-hukumet-kurulamadi/924214, (E. T. 17/03/2021).
  2. AGNEW, John “Remaking Italy? Place Configurations and Italian Electoral Politics under the Second Republic”, Modern Italy, C. 12, S. 1, 2007.
  3. BALDINI, Gianfranco, “The Different Trajectories of Italian Electoral Reforms”, West European Politics, C. 34, S. 3, 2011.
  4. RASGON, Adam, Israel Has Its 4th National Election in 2 Years. Here’s Why, https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/17/world/middleeast/israeli-election.html, (E. T. 17/03/2021).
  5. BEDOCK, Camille, SAUGER, Nicolas, Electoral Systems with Majority Bonus as Unconventional Mixed Systems, Representation, 2014, C. 50, S. 1, s. 99-112
  6. BEDOCK, Camille, SAUGER, Nicolas, Electoral Systems with Majority Bonus as Mixed Systems Congrès AFSP, 2013.
  7. Carr, Adam, Greek Republic, psephos.adam-carr.net/countries/g/greece/, (E. T. 20.01.2021).
  8. CARR, Adam, Most Serene Republic of San Marino, 2021, psephos.adamcarr.net/countries/s/sanmarino/, (E. T. 10.03.2021).
  9. CHIARAMONTE Alessandro, D'ALIMONTE, Roberto, The New Italian Electoral System and its Effects on Strategic Coordination and Disproportionality, Italian Political Science, C. 13, S. 1, 2018.
  10. CHIARAMONTE, Alessandro, The Unfinished Story of the Electoral Reforms in Italy: The Difficult Attempt to Build a Majoritarian-Style of Government, 2014, http://www.sisp.it/files/papers/2014/alessandro-chiaramonte-1827.pdf, (E. T. 11.03.2021). COURTE CONSTITUZIONALE, 2014, https://dochero.tips/judgment-no1-year-2014.html, (E. T. 21.02.2021). D’ALIMONTE, Roberto, The New Italian Electoral System: Majority-Assuring But Minority-Friendly, Contemporary Italian Politics, C.7, S. 3, s. 286-292.
  11. DIAN, Schefold, Constitutional Reform and Constitutional Unity, The Italian Law Journal, Special Issue, 2017. DIPARTIMENTO PER GLI AFFARI INTERNI E TERRITORIALI, 2021, https://elezionistorico.interno.gov.it/index.php, (E. T. 18.03.2021). DIPARTIMENTO PER GLI AFFARI INTERNI E TERRITORIALI, Camera 07/06/1953 Area Italia, 2021, elezionistorico.interno.gov.it/index.php?tpel=C&dtel=07/06/1953&tpa=I&tpe=A&lev0=0&levsut0=0&es0=S&ms=S, (E. T. 19.01.2021). DIPARTIMENTO PER GLI AFFARI INTERNI E TERRITORIALI, Camera 09/04/2006 Area Italia (escl. Valle d'Aosta), elezionistorico.interno.gov.it/index.php?tpel=C&dtel=09/04/2006&tpa=I&tpe=A&lev0=0&levsut0=0&es0=S&ms=S, (E. T. 23.02.2021). DIPARTIMENTO PER GLI AFFARI INTERNI E TERRITORIALI, Camera 13/04/2008 Area Italia