Journals / Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Mesleklerinde Tanınmış Yüz Türk Kadınının Kişilik ve Liderlik Özellikleri

Pages
86–138
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, all the findings are held together and analyze, then the necessary information about the particularities of leadership and personality that affect the factors of being successful is stated with a totalitarian perspective to the question of "who are these 100 women".

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There are three basic objectives of that study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In that part the particularities of leadership and personality of these 100 women are stated in details.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, all the findings are held together and analyze, then the necessary information about the particularities of leadership and personality that affect the factors of being successful is stated with a totalitarian perspective to the question of "who are these 100 women".
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Türkiye · Turkey

Abstract

There are three basic objectives of that study. First one is; determining the particularities of leadership and personal particularities of a hundred Turkish Women that are famous in their professions and the factors that affect those particularities thendetermining how these factors were effective in their social situation in today's world. Second one is after determining these factors, to explain what these "factors of success" can be in a person's life. Finally, forming a link between the concepts of "leader" and "innovator" and then proving that the people who are called as "innovator" can be accepted as "leader". In Order to reach this aim, firstly the information of this study is presented. In this part, the scope and the goal of the research, the reason of its necessity and its methodology are stated. Secondly, the studies about this subject those are realized in our country and in the world are compared with the results of the analysis. In that part the particularities of leadership and personality of these 100 women are stated in details. Finally, all the findings are held together and analyze, then the necessary information about the particularities of leadership and personality that affect the factors of being successful is stated with a totalitarian perspective to the question of "who are these 100 women".

Özet

Bu çalışmanın üç ana amacı bulunmaktadır. Bunlardan birincisi; ülkemizde mesleklerinde tanınmış yüz Türk kadınının kişilik ve liderlik özelliklerini ve bu özellikleri etkileyen faktörleri belirleyerek, onların bulundukları konuma gelmelerinde bu özelliklerin ne ölçüde etkili olduğunu tespit edebilmek, ikinci olarak; bu özelliklerin bulunmasıyla, bir kişinin başarılı olmasında etken olan "başarılı olma faktörleri "nin neler olabileceğim açıklayabilmek; son olarak da "lider" ve "öncü" kavramları arasında bir bağlantı kurarak, "öncü" olarak tanımlanan kişilerin de "lider" olarak kabul edilebileceğini gösterebilmektir. Bu amaca ulaşmak için, ilk önce araştırma ile ilgili bilgiler sunulmuştur. Burada araştırmanın amacı, kapsamı, neden gerektiği ile metodolojisine yer verilmiştir. İkinci olarak, ülkemizde ve dünyada konu ile ilgili yapılan çalışmalar, analiz sonuçlarıyla karşılaştırılmıştır. Bu bölümde aynı zamanda ele alınan kadınların kişilik ve liderlik özelliklerine detaylı bir şekilde yer verilmiştir. Son olarak da, tüm bulgular bir arada ele alınarak analiz edilmiş ve "Neden bu kadınlar" sorusuna bütüncül bir bakış açısı ile bakılarak, "başarılı olma faktörleri "ni etkileyen kişilik ve liderlik özellikleri hakkında yararlı olacağı düşünülen bilgiler verilmeye çalışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ONAY, M. Ö. (2003). Mesleklerinde Tanınmış Yüz Türk Kadınının Kişilik ve Liderlik Özellikleri. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 86–138. https://ajindex.com/articles/314820

References (20)

  1. ALLPORT, G & Odbert (1981) "Language and Individual Differences: The Search for Universals in Personality Lexicons", Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Beverly Hills, CA:Sage, pp.141-165.
  2. Ana Britanica Dictionary BALES, R.F (1950) Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups, Cambridge, Mass: Addison-Wesley. BASS, Bernard (1981)
  3. Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership, New York: The Free Press.
  4. BEDELAN, Arthur (1989)
  5. Organizational Behaviour, Orlando: The Dryden Press.
  6. BENNIS, Warren & Robert TOWNSEND (1997)
  7. Reinventing Leadership, London:Judy Piatkus Ltd. BENNIS, Warren (1989)
  8. Bir Lider Olabilmek, Istanbul:Sistem Yayıncılık A.Ş. BENTZ, Jon (1990) " Contextual Issues in Predicting High-Level Leadership Performance", (der. A. CLARK), Measures of Leadership, New Jersey: West Orange Pub. BERY, Liily (1998) Psychology at Work: An Introduction to Organizational Psychology, New York: McGraw Hill Co. BIRCH, Paul (1999)
  9. Instant Leadership, UK: Kogan Page Limited. BOND,M.H & H. NAKAZATO & D. SHIRAISHI (1975) " Universality and Distinctiveness in Dimensions of Japanese Person Perception", Journal of Cross-Culturel Psychology, (6), 3, pp.347-357.
  10. BONS, Paul (1981)
  11. Leadership in Organizations, New York: USMA Press.
  12. BORGATTA, E.F. (1964) "The Structure of Personality Characteristics", Behavioral Sciences, (12), 3, pp. 197-220.
  13. CATELL, R. B. (1947) "Confirmation and Clarification of Primary Personality Factors", Pychometrika, (12), 3, pp.197-220.
  14. CHURCH, Loretta (1986) "Relationships Between Manager's Personality Characteristics and Their Management Level", Akron Business and Economics Review, 17,4, pp.29-45.
  15. CLEMMER, Jim & Art McNEIL (1989)
  16. Leadership Skills for Every Manager, Chatham, Kent: Great Britain by Mackays of Chatham PLC. CLIFFORD, Morgan (1984) Introduction to Pcsychology (der. H. Arıç), Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  17. CONSTANTINI, E & K.H. CRAIK (1980) " Personality and Politicians: California Party Leader, 1960-1976", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, pp.641-661.
  18. COSTA, P.T & R.R. McCRAE & D.A. DYE (1991) "Facet Scales for Agreeableness and Conscientiousness; A Revison of the NEO Personality Inventory", Personality and Individual Differences, (12), 9, pp. 887-898.
  19. COSTA, P.T & R.R. McCRAE (1995) "Domains and Facets: Hierachical Personality Assesment Using The Revised NEO Personality Inventory", Journal of Personality Assesment, 64,(1), pp.21-50.
  20. CSOKA, Louis (1985) "Leadership and Organizations Outcomes