SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ondokuz Mayıs Üniv. Diş Hekimliği Derg. / 2006 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of fiber reinforced composite (FRC) fixed prosthesis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and to make elemental analysis (EDS) of their contents

Fiberle güçlendirilmiş kompozit (FGK) sabit protezlerin taramalı elektron mikroskop (SEM) ile değerlendirilmesi ve içeriklerinin element analizlerinin (EDS) yapılması

Göknil ERGÜN
MURAT YENİSEY
Pages
73–81
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

EDS method may be used to determine elemental combination of materials.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the bond area morphologies of fixed prosthesis combinations that has a lower structure with fiber reinforced composite (FRC) and upper structure with four different restorative composites and to evaluate composition of FRC and restorative composite materials which are used in the study qualitatively by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and additionally to determine quantitatively the composition of FRC, restorative composites and flowable composite materials by elemental analysis (EDS) and to compare company datas.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: To evaluate the bond area of the FRC fixed prosthesis which were prepared with FRC 'EverStick', four different restorative composites 'Admira, GrandiO, Filtek Z 250, Filtek Supreme' and flowable composite 'Filtek Flow', totally four different FRC fixed prosthesis specimens were prepared.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:EDS method may be used to determine elemental combination of materials.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biyomedikal ve dental materyaller · Kompozit rezinler · Mikroskopi

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the bond area morphologies of fixed prosthesis combinations that has a lower structure with fiber reinforced composite (FRC) and upper structure with four different restorative composites and to evaluate composition of FRC and restorative composite materials which are used in the study qualitatively by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and additionally to determine quantitatively the composition of FRC, restorative composites and flowable composite materials by elemental analysis (EDS) and to compare company datas. Material and Methods: To evaluate the bond area of the FRC fixed prosthesis which were prepared with FRC 'EverStick', four different restorative composites 'Admira, GrandiO, Filtek Z 250, Filtek Supreme' and flowable composite 'Filtek Flow', totally four different FRC fixed prosthesis specimens were prepared. The specimens' surface morphologies were evaluated with SEM. To determine the element composition EDS analysis were made. Results: According to SEM images there were succesfull bond areas between FRC and all restorative composites. It's seen that there were no voids when intermediate resin applied to FRC specimens. Conclusion: With combination of FRC and different restorative materials in local areas succesfull FRC fixed prosthesis can be made. EDS method may be used to determine elemental combination of materials.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı bir fiberle güçlendirilmiş kompozit (FGK) altyapı ile dört farklı restoratif kompozit üst yapıdan oluşturulan sabit protez kombinasyonlarının bağlantı alanlarının morfolojisini ve çalışmada kullanılan FGK' in ve restoratif kompozitlerin yapısını kalitatif olarak taramalı elektron mik¬roskop (SEM) ile incelemek; ilave olarak ise element analizi (EDS) ile çalışmada kullandığımız FGK, restoratif kompozit ve akışkan kompozit mateıyallerinin içeriklerini kantitatif olarak belirlemek ve firma verileriyle karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: FGK ' Ev er Stick', dört farklı restoratif kompozit 'Admira, GrandiO, Filtek Z 250 ve Filtek Supreme' ve akışkan kompozit 'Filtek Flow' ile hazırlanan FGK sabit protezlerin bağlantı alanlarını incelemek için, toplam dört adet FGK sabit protez materyali örneği hazırlandı. Örneklerin yüzey morfolojileri SEM ile incelendi. Element içeriklerinin belirlenmesi için ise EDS yapıldı. Bulgular: SEM görüntülerine göre, bütün restoratif kompozitler ile FGK arasında başarılı bağlantı bölgeleri izlendi. Ara re-zin uygulanmış FGK örneklerinde hava boşlukları oluşmadığı görüldü. Sonuçlar: FGK ve farklı restoratif kompozit kombinasyonları ile lokalize alanlarda başarılı FGK sabit protezler yapılabilir. EDS, materyallerin element içeriklerini belirlemek için kullanı¬labilecek bir yöntemdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERGÜN, G., YENİSEY, M. (2006). Evaluation of fiber reinforced composite (FRC) fixed prosthesis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and to make elemental analysis (EDS) of their contents. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniv. Diş Hekimliği Derg., Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 73–81. https://ajindex.com/articles/294362

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Freilich MA, Karmaker AC, Burstone CJ, Goldberg AJ. Development and clinical applications of a light polymerized fiber reinforced composite. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 80: 311-8
  2. Meiers JC, Duncan JP, Freilich MA, Goldberg J. Preimpregnated, fiber reinforced prostheses. Part II. Direct applications: Splints and fixed partial dentures. Quintessence Int. 1998; 29: 761-8
  3. Goldberg AJ, Burstone CJ. The use of continuous fiber reinforcement in dentistry. Dent Mater. 1992; 8: 197-202
  4. Kirzioglu Z, Erturk MS. Success of reinforced fiber material space maintainers. J Dent Child (Chic). 2004; 71: 158-62
  5. Jain P, Cobb D. Evaluation of a glass fiber.reinforced, bonded, inlay supported fixed parti, al denture-4 year results. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2002; 23: 779-2
  6. Meiers JC, Freilich MA. Chairside prefabricated fiber reinforced resin composite fixed partial dentures. Quintessence Int. 2001; 32:99-104 7. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Latzel D, Kreisler T. Comparision of three types of fiber reinforced composite molar crowns on their fracture resistance and marginal adaptation. J Dent. 2001; 29: 187-96
  7. Bae JM, Kim KN, Hattori M, Hasegawa K, Yoshinari M, Kawada E, Oda Y. The flexural properties of fiber-reinforced composite with light-polymerized polymer matrix. Int J Prosthodont. 2001; 14: 33-9
  8. Lastumaki TM, KallioTT, Vallittu PK. The bond strength of light-curing composite resin to finally polymerized glass fiber- reinforced composite substrate. Biomaterials. 2002; 23: 4533-9
  9. Chong KH, Chai J. Probability of failure of veneered glass fiber reinforced composites and glass infiltrated alumina with or without zirconia reinforcement. Int J Prosthodont. 2003; 16: 487-92
  10. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Ebert J, Lohbauer U, Kappel S, Petschelt A. Fatigue behavior of the resin-resin bond of partially replaced resin-based composite restorations. Am J Dent. 2003; 16: 17-22. 12. van der Vyver PJ, de Wet FA, Botha SJ. Shear bond strength of five porcelain repair systems on cerec porcelain. SADJ. 2005; 60: 196-8
  11. Prati C, Foschi F, Nucci C, Montebugnoli L, Marchionni S. Appearance of the root canal walls after preparation with NiTi rotary instruments: a comparative SEM investigation. Clin Oral Investig. 2004; 8: 102-10
  12. Van Eldik DA, Zilm PS, Rogers AH, Marin PD. A SEM evaluation of debris removal from endodontic files after cleaning and steam sterilization procedures. Aust Dent J. 2004; 49: 128-35
  13. Maalhagh-Fard A, Wagner WC. Repair of fractured