The treatment of skeletal open bite with orthognatic surgery

Key Findings & Data:The treatment of skeletal open bite named " long face syndrome" using only orthodontic mechanotherapy has always been difficult.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:This, paper evaluates various studies about this matter and provides knowledge about the treatment of skeletal open bite with orthognatic surgery.

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample

⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The skeletal and dental deformities, involves both the dentoalveolar regions and the skeletal regions of the mandible. The treatment of skeletal open bite named " long face syndrome" using only orthodontic mechanotherapy has always been difficult. The aim of orthognatic treatment is to construct a balance between the various components of face skeleton and to make preparations of constructing adequate dental occlusion and functional stomathognatic system. Recently, there have been many new researches that involve the relationship between orthognatic surgery and orthodontic mechanotherapy. Today, the orthodontic-surgical treatment of the patients even with limited masticatory functions and have serious dentofacial deformation, has become a routine procedure for both the maxillofacial surgeons and orthodontists. This, paper evaluates various studies about this matter and provides knowledge about the treatment of skeletal open bite with orthognatic surgery.

Özet

İskeletsel ve dental deformiteler, dentoalveoler bölgelerle bir¬likte maksilla ve mandibulanıniskeletsel bölgelerini de içerir. "Uzun yüz sendromu" diye de adlandırılan iskeletsel açık ka¬panış vakalarının tedavisinin yalnızca ortodontik mekanotera-pi ile çözülmesi zordur. Ortognatik tedavinin amacı; yüz iske¬letinin çeşitli komponentleri arasında bir denge kurmak, yeter¬li dental okluzyon ve fonksiyonel stomatognatik sistemin oluş¬turulması için ortam hazırlamaktır. Son yıllarda ortognatik cerrahinin ortodontik tedavi ile ilişkisini kapsayan yeni araş¬tırmalar yapılmaktadır. Günümüzde ciddi dentofasiyal defor-mite gösteren ve çiğneme fonksiyonları sınırlı olan hastaların tedavileri dahi ortodontik-cerrahi tedavileri, ortodontistler ve maksillofasiyal cerrahlar için rutin işlemler arasına girmiştir. Bu makale, bu konuda yapılan çeşitli çalışmaları değerlendire¬rek iskeletsel açık kapanışın ortognatik cerrahi ile tedavisi hak¬kında bilgi vermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULUSOY, Ç., DARENDELİLER, H. N. (2007). The treatment of skeletal open bite with orthognatic surgery. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniv. Diş Hekimliği Derg., Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 65–73. https://ajindex.com/articles/293228

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

Schwestka-Polly R, Kubein-Meesenburg D, Nagerl H. Harmonization of free mandibular movements by orthodontic-surgical treatment of patients with mandibular retrognathism. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 2000; 15: 205-31. 2.Silvestri A. Long -term control of the stability of skeletal structures in class II dentoskeletal deformities after surgical-orthodontic therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994; 105: 375-82. 3.Wessberg GA et al. Autorotation of the mandible: effect of surgical superior repositioning of the maxilla on mandibular resting posture. Am J Orthod 1982; 81: 465-72. 4.Cho HJ. Patient with severe skeletal classIII maloclusion and severe openbite treated by orthodontics & orthognatic surgery- a case report. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996'; 110: 155-62. 5.Wolford LM, Karras SC, Mehra P. Considerations for orthognathic surgery during growth, part 1: Mandibular deformities. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2001; 119: 95-101. 6.Ellis E, McNamara JA. Components of adult class III openbite malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1984; 86: 277-90. 7.Moldez MA. Long-term dentofacial stability after bimaxillary sur¬ gery in' skeletal class III openbite patients. Int J Adult Orthod. Orthognath Surg. 2000; 15: 309-19. 8.Suri Ş, Utreja A. Management of a hyperdivergent Class III malocclusion, maxillary midline diastema and infected mandibular incisors in a young adult. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2003; 124: 725-34. 9.Brammer J. Stability after bimaxillary surgery to correct vertical maxillary excess and mandibular deficiency. J Oral and Maxillofac Surg 1980; 38: 664-70. 10.Graber LW. Orthodontics, state of the art, essence of the science. St.Louis,The CV Mosby Co 1986, 130-91. 11.Ware WH, Taylor RC. Condylar repositioning following osteotomies for correction of mandibular prognatism. Am J Orthod. 1968; 54: 50-9. 12.Vego L. Early orthopedic treatment for class III skeletal patterns. Am J Orthod. 1976; 70: 59-69. 13.Graber LW. Chin cup therapy for mandibular prognatism. Am J Orthod. 1977; 77: 23-41. 14.Schuster G, Lux CJ, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A. Children with class III malocclusion: development of multivariate statistical models to predict future need for orthognatic surgery. Angle Orthod. 2003; 73; 136-45. 15.Soncul M, Bamber MA. Evaluation of facial soft tissue changes with optical surface scan after surgical correction of Class III deformities. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 62: 1331-40. 16.Ewing M, Ross B. Soft tissue response to mandibular advencement and genioplasty.