Journals / Ondokuz Mayıs Üniv. Diş Hekimliği Derg. / 2006 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Enamel matrix proteins and periodontal regeneration

Mine matriks proteinleri ve periodontal rejenerasyon

Pages
147–155
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the present review, the role and efficacy of enamel matrix proteins in periodontal wound healing have, been scrutinized evaluating previous and current histopathological, ultrastructural and molecular researches.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Formation or regeneration of any type of tissue is materialized by a very regular process amongst the phenotypes of cells and their interrelations, locally and/or systemically functioning growth and differentiation factors and, the extracellular matrix in which these events occur.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Enamel matrix derivative, a biomimetic presented with the assertion to provide periodontal regeneration via mimicing the role of enamel matrix proteins during tooth-development, has been demonstrated to be effective in reconstruction of the components of periodontium, particularly together with acellular cementum.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the present review, the role and efficacy of enamel matrix proteins in periodontal wound healing have, been scrutinized evaluating previous and current histopathological, ultrastructural and molecular researches.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Diş minesi · Periodonti · Yara iyileşmesi

Abstract

Formation or regeneration of any type of tissue is materialized by a very regular process amongst the phenotypes of cells and their interrelations, locally and/or systemically functioning growth and differentiation factors and, the extracellular matrix in which these events occur. In recent years, growth and differentiation factors, extracellular matrix proteins and attachment factors, bone metabolism mediators have been used in many in vitro and/or in vivo studies to investigate these biological events and consequently, different biomaterials and bio-mimetics have been introduced. Enamel matrix derivative, a biomimetic presented with the assertion to provide periodontal regeneration via mimicing the role of enamel matrix proteins during tooth-development, has been demonstrated to be effective in reconstruction of the components of periodontium, particularly together with acellular cementum. Nevertheless to-date; (i) no superiority of these proteins have been proven to regenerative modalities, primarily to Guided Tisue Regeneration technique, except for possible efficacy on acellular cementum reconstruction, (ii) the biological mechanisms that these proteins regulate and activate in periodontal healing process have not been well-understood. In the present review, the role and efficacy of enamel matrix proteins in periodontal wound healing have, been scrutinized evaluating previous and current histopathological, ultrastructural and molecular researches.

Özet

Herhangi bir doku tipinin oluşması veya rejenerasyonu hücrelerin fenotipleri ve birbiriyle olan ilişkileri, lokal ve sistemik olarak fonksiyon gören büyüme faktörleri ve hormonların düzenleyici etkileri ve tüm bu olayların geliştiği ekstraselüler matriks arasındaki son derece düzenli bir biyolojik süreçle gerçekleşir. Son yıllarda periodontal yara iyileşmesinde bu biyolojik olayları incelemek amacıyla büyüme ve farklılaşma faktörlerinin, ekstraselüler matriks proteinlerinin ve ataşman faktörlerinin, kemik metebolizması mediyatörlerinin kullanıldığı pek çok in vitro ve/veya in vivo çalışma yapılmış; bunun sonucunda çeşitli biyomateryaller ve biyomimetikler kullanıma sunulmuştur. Diş sürmesi esnasında mine matriks proteinlerinin üstlendiği biyolojik rolün taklit edilmesiyle periodontal rejeneras-yonun sağlanabileceği düşünülerek kullanıma sunulan mine matriks derivesinin, esas itibariyle aselüler sement ile birlikte periodonsiyumun diğer komponentlerinin rejenerasyonunda etkili olabileceği pek çok araştırmayla gösterilmiştir. Ancak, günümüzde hala mine matriks proteinlerinin periodontal yara iyileşmesinde, aselüler sement rejenere edebilmesi dışında; (i) başta Yönlendirilmiş Doku Rejenerasyonu tekniği olmakla birlikte rejeneratif yöntemlere net bir üstünlüğü kanıtlanamamış, (ii) bu proteinlerin periodontal yara iyileşmesi proçesinde rol oynadığı ve etkili olduğu biyolojik mekanizmalar tam olarak anlaşılamamıştır. Buradaki derlemede, günümüze kadar yapılmış histopatolojik, ultrastrüktürel ve moleküler düzeydeki çalışmalar değerlendirilerek, mine matriks proteinlerinin periodontal yara iyileşme sindeki rolü ve etkinliği irdelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAKALLIOĞLU, U. (2006). Enamel matrix proteins and periodontal regeneration. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniv. Diş Hekimliği Derg., Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 147–155. https://ajindex.com/articles/293211

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Yukna, RA, Mayer, ET, Brite, DV. Longitudinal evaluation of durapatit ceramics as an alloplastic implant in periodontal osseous defects after 3 years. J Periodontol. 1984; 55: 633-7
  2. Bowers GM, Chadroff B, Carnevale R, et al. Histologic evaluation of new attachment apparatus formation in humans: part 1. J Periodontol. 1989; 60: 664-70, 3. Brunsvold MA, Mellonig T. Bone grafts and periodontal regeneration. Periodontology 2000. 1993; 1: 80-91
  3. Aichelmann-Riedy ME, Yukna RA. Bone replacement grafts. Dent Clin North Ame. 1998; 42: 491-503
  4. Rosenberg E, Rose LF. Biological and clinical considerations for autografts and allografts in periodontal regeneration therapy. Dent Clin North Ame. 1998; 42:467-90
  5. Poison AM, Frederick G, Ladenheim S, Hanes P. The production of a root surface smear layer by instrumentation and its removal by citric acid. J Periodontal Res. 1985; 55:44-6
  6. Lowenguth R, Blieden TM. Periodontal regeneration: root surface demineralization. Periodontology 2000. 1993; 1:54-68
  7. Higashi T, Onzuka T, Satoh G, Yoshino H, Okamata H. Collagen formation at the tooth cell interface: comparative ultrastructural study on the effcet of partial demineralization of cementum with dentin. J Periodontol. 1995; 66:267-73
  8. Tatakis DN, Promsudthl A, Wikesjo UME. Devices for periodontal regeneration. Periodoniology 2000. 1999; 19:59-73
  9. Garrett S. Specific issues in clinical trials on the use of barrier membranes in periodontal regeneration. Ann Periodontol. 1997; 1: 240-59
  10. Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. Focus on intrabony defects:guided tissue regeneration. Periodontology 2000. 2000; 22: 104-32
  11. Sanz M, Giovannoli JL. Focus on furcation defects: guided tissue regeneration. Periodontology 2000. 2000; 22: 69-189
  12. Caffesse RG, Quinones CR. Polypeptide growth factors and attachment proteins in periodontal wound healing and regeneration. Periodontology 2000. 1993; 1: 69-79
  13. Cochran DL, Wozney J M. Biologic mediators for periodontal regeneration. Periodontology. 2000. 1999; 19: 40-58
  14. Giannobile WV, Somerman MJ. Growth and amelogenin-like factors in periodontal wound healing. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol. 2003; 8: 193-204
  15. Herold R, Rosenbloom J, Granovsky M. Phylogenetic distribution of enamel proteins: immunohistolocalization with monoclonal antibodies indicates the evolutionary appearance of enamelins prior to amelogenins. Calcified Tissue Int. 1989; 45: 88-94
  16. Robinson C, Brookes SJ, Share RC, Kirkham J. Th