SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ondokuz Mayıs Üniv. Diş Hekimliği Derg. / 2006 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Effect of two provisional restorative materials on the shear bond strength of two different dentin bonding agents on enamel

İki farklı geçici dolgu materyalinin iki farklı dentin bağlayıcısının minedeki makaslama bağlantı dayancına etkisi

Selim ERKUT
Serdar ARIKAN
H. Cenker KÜÇÜKEŞMEN
Pages
15–21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Fluor containing provisional restorative material tested may reduce the shear bond strength values between the enamel and resin based restorative material when self-etch adhesive tested was used.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength between enamel which had been contact with different provisional restorative materials and different dentin bonding agents Material and Methods: Sixty human molar teeth were used for the shear bond testing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Six groups (n=10) of specimens were established according to the different bonding groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Fluor containing provisional restorative material tested may reduce the shear bond strength values between the enamel and resin based restorative material when self-etch adhesive tested was used.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Diş minesi · Dental materyaller · Azı dişi

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength between enamel which had been contact with different provisional restorative materials and different dentin bonding agents Material and Methods: Sixty human molar teeth were used for the shear bond testing. Six groups (n=10) of specimens were established according to the different bonding groups. In control groups dentin bonding agents (Single Bond and SE Bond) were directly applied to the prepared enamel surfaces. For the provisional restorative groups; a layer of provisional restorative material (Coltosol F or Cavit G) were placed. After the removal of the provisional dentin bonding agents and resin based restorative (Filtek Z250) were applied. After thermocycling shear bond strength values were determined using a universal Jesting machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mmlmin. Mean shear bond strength values of each specimen group were analyzed using a 2-way analysis variance, followed by a post hoc Duncan test (a=.05). Results: When enamel surfaces were contaminated with provisional restorative prior to application of bonding agents, this reduced the mean shear bond strength values compared to control groups. However this was only statistically significant for the specimens of SE Bond group treated with Coltosol F (P<0.05). Conclusion: Fluor containing provisional restorative material tested may reduce the shear bond strength values between the enamel and resin based restorative material when self-etch adhesive tested was used.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızda daha önce geçici dolgu maddeleri ile temas etmiş mine ve farklı dentin bağlayıcıları arasındaki makaslama bağlantı direncinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamızda 60 adet çürüksüz molar diş makaslama bağlantı direncinin incelenmesinde kullanılmıştır. Altı örnek grubu (n=10) farklı bağlanma tiplerine göre ayrılmıştır. Kontrol gruplarında dentin bağlayıcı ajanları (Single Bond ve ŞE Bond) doğrudan prepare edilmiş mine yüzeylerine uygulanmıştır. Geçici dolgu materyal grupları için dolgu materyalleri mine yüzeyine yerleştirilmiş (Coltosol F veya Cavit G) ve daha sonra bu maddelerin yüzeyden uzaklaştırılmasını takiben dentin bağlayıcılar ve kompozit dolgu materyali (Filtek Z250) mine yüzeylerine uygulanmıştır. Termal siklus sonrası her örneğe ait makaslama bağlantı dayançları 2 yönlü varyans analizi ve ona bağlı olarak Duncan çoklu kanşılaştırma testi kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir (a=.O5). Bulgular: Prepare edilmiş mine yüzeylerinin geçici dolgu materyalleri ile kontaminasyonu bağlantı ajanlarının mineye olan makaslama bağlantı dayançlannda azalmaya neden olmuştur. Fakat gözlenen bu azalma sadece SE Bond bağlantı ajanının Coltosol F uygulanan grubu için istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur. (P<0.05). Sonuç: Flor ihtiva eden geçici dolgu materyalleri, incelenen self-etch bağlayıcı kullanıldığı zaman mineye olan bağlantı direncinde azalmaya neden olabilirler.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERKUT, S., ARIKAN, S., KÜÇÜKEŞMEN, H. C. (2006). Effect of two provisional restorative materials on the shear bond strength of two different dentin bonding agents on enamel. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniv. Diş Hekimliği Derg., Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 15–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/293207

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Anusavice KJ. Phillips' Science of Dental Materials. 11 th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2003. p. 382-6, 449, 491
  2. Yoshida K, Tanagawa M, Atsuta M. In vitro solubility of three types of resin and conventional luting cements J Oral Rehabil. 1998; 25: 285-91
  3. Mitchell CA, Pintado MR, Geary L, Douglas WH. Retention of adhesive cement on the tooth surface after crown cementation. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 81; 668-77
  4. Mitchell CA, Douglas WH, Cheng YS. Fracture toughness of conventional, resin modified glass-ionomer and composite luting cements. Dent Mater. 1999; 15: 7-13
  5. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955; 34: 849-53
  6. Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives Part II: etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater. 2001; 17:430-44
  7. Torii Y, Itou K, Hikasa R, Iwata S, Nishitani Y. Enamel tensil bond strength and morphology or resin-enamel interface created by acid etching system with our without moisture and self etching priming system; J Oral Rehabil. 2002; 29: 528-33
  8. Watanabe K, Yamashita A, Imai M, Yatani H, Suzuki K. Temporary cement remnants as an adhesion inhibiting factor in the interface between resin cements and bovine dentin. Int J Prosthodont. 1997; 10: 440-52
  9. Nagaoka S, Miyazaki Y, Liu HJ, Iwamoto Y, Kitano M, Kawagoe M. Bacterial invasion into dentinal tubules of human vital and nonvital teeth. J Endod. 1995; 21: 70-3
  10. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett S. Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics. 3th ed. Illinois: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc; 1997; p. 225-56
  11. Garber DA, Goldstein RE. Porcelain and composite inlays and onlays, esthetic posterior restorations. Illinois: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc; 1994; p. 57-63
  12. Hosoya N, Cox CF, Arai T, Nakamura J. The walking bleach procedure: an in vitro study to measure microleakage of five temporary sealing agents. J Endod. 2000; 12: 716-8
  13. Balto H. An assessment of microbial coronal leakage of temporary filling materials in endodontically treated teeth. J Endod. 2002; 28:762-4
  14. Beach CW, Calhoun JC, Bramwell JD, Hutter JW, Miller GA. Clinical evaluation of bacterial leakage of endodontic temporary filling materials. J Endod. 1996; 22: 459-62
  15. Mayer T, Eickholz P. Microleakage of temporary restorations after thermocycling and mechanical loading. J Endod. 1997; 23: 320-2. 16 Millstein P, Nathanson D. Effect of temporary ceme