SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ondokuz Mayıs Üniv. Diş Hekimliği Derg. / 2006 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

The cause of surgical removal of imğacted third molars

Gönüllü üçüncü molar dişlerin cerrahi çekim nedenleri

MAHMUT SUMER
Ahmet Ferhat MISIR
A. Pınar SÜMER
Pages
189–193
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Data on the prevalence of different diseases, angular position, and degree of impaction of the third molars are important factors in deciding third molar removal.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the position of and the various indications for removal of impacted third molars.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: A survey of 1139 impacted third molars subjected to removal was performed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Data on the prevalence of different diseases, angular position, and degree of impaction of the third molars are important factors in deciding third molar removal.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Azı dişi · üçüncü · Radyografi

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the position of and the various indications for removal of impacted third molars. Material and Methods: A survey of 1139 impacted third molars subjected to removal was performed. The prevalence of different diseases, angular position, and degree ofimpaction of the third molars were registered. Results: Pericoronitis was found in 35.5% of cases, prophylactic removal in 29.1%, chronic facial pain in 21.6%, and caries in the second molar in 8.2%. The vertical position was the most common position for the third molars (590; 51.2%) followed by mesioangular position (229; 20.1%). Level A impaction was the most (620; 54.4%). Conclusion: Data on the prevalence of different diseases, angular position, and degree of impaction of the third molars are important factors in deciding third molar removal.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, gömülü üçüncü molar dişlerin çekim nedenlerinin ve pozisyonlarının belirlenmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmada çekimi yapılan 1139 adet gömülü üçüncü molar diş klinik ve radyografik olarak incelenmiştir. Üçüncü molar dişlerin açısal pozisyonları, gömüklülük dereceleri ve çekim endikasyonlan değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Perikoronitis %35.5, profilaktik endikasyon %29.1, kronik yüz ağrısı %21.6 ve komşu ikinci molar dişte çürük %8.2'lik oranla çekim nedenleri olarak belirlenmiştir. Üçüncü molar dişlerde en sık vertikal pozisyona (590; %51.2) rastlanılmış, bunu meziyoanguler pozisyon (229; %20.1) takip etmiştir. Gömüklülük derecesine göre ise en sık sınıf A (620; %54.4) gömüklülük bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Üçüncü molar dişlerin cerrahi olarak çıkarılmasına karar verilmesinde ve ileride oluşabilecek patolojilerden korunmak için yapılacak tedavi planlamasında, üçüncü molar dişlerdeki farklı hastalıkların prevalansı, açısal pozisyonlar ve gömüklülük derecelerinin değerlendirilmesi önemlidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SUMER, M., MISIR, A. F., SÜMER, A. P. (2006). The cause of surgical removal of imğacted third molars. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniv. Diş Hekimliği Derg., Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 189–193. https://ajindex.com/articles/293203

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Yazıcı S, Kökden A, Tank A. Gömülü dişler üzerine retrospektif bir çalışma. CÜ Dişhekimliği Fak Derg. 2002
  2. Bataineh AB, Albashaireh ZS, Hazza'a AM. The surgical removal of third molars: A study decision making. Quintessence Int. 2002
  3. Lopez V, Mumenya R, Feinmann C, Harris M. Third molar surgery: An audit of the indications for surgery, post-operative complaints and patient satisfaction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995
  4. Van der Linden W, Cleaton-Jones P, Lownie M. Diseases and lesions associated with third molars: Review of 1001 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995
  5. Brickley M, Shepherd J, Mancini G. Comparison of clinical treatment decisions with US National Institutes of Health consensus indications for lower third molar removal. Br Dent J. 1993
  6. Winter GB. Impacted mandibular third molar. St Louis: American Book, 1926
  7. Pell GJ, Gregory BT. Impacted mandibular third molars
  8. Classification and modified technique for removal. Dental Digest. 1933
  9. Knutsson K, Brehmer B, Lysell L, Rohlin M. Pathoses associated with mandibular third molars subjected to removal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996
  10. Rajasuo A, Peltola J, Venta I, Murtomaa H. Radiographic findings on 3rd molars removed in 20-year-old men. Acta Odontol Scand. 2003
  11. Lysell L, Rohlin M. A study of indications used for removal of the mandibular third molar. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988
  12. Punwutikorn J, Waikakul A, Ochaeron P. Symptoms of unerupt-ed mandibular third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999
  13. Açıkgöz A. Gömülü üçüncü molar dişlere bağlı oluşan patolojilerin diş pozisyonlarına göre dağılımı: radyografik bir çalışma. S.Ü. Dişhekimliği Fak Derg. 2002
  14. Shepherd JP. Surgical removal of third molars. BMJ. 1994
  15. Mercier P, Precious D. Risks and benefits of removal of impacted third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992
  16. Hugoson A, Kugelberg CF. The prevalence of third molars in a Swedish population. An epidemiological study. Community Dent Health. 1988
  17. Quek SL, Tay CK, Tay KH, Toh SL, Lim KC. Pattern of third molar impaction in a Singapore Chinese population: A retrospective radiographic survey. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003
  18. Kramer RM, Williams AC. The incidence of impacted teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pat