Journals / Memleket Siyaset Yönetim / 2020 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 34

THE ETHICAL AND PRACTICAL CONSEQUENCES OF ORGAN MARKET

ORGAN TİCARETİNİN ETİK VE PRATİK SONUÇLARI

Pages
373–402
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this article, it is argued that, present arguments against organ markets are not conclusive.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Organ transplantation and organ procurement are literally, matters of life and death for humanity and an important determinant of life quality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Organ trading, which can provide an alternative to organ donation, is legal only in Iran and prohibited in all the other countries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this article, it is argued that, present arguments against organ markets are not conclusive.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Organ transplantation and organ procurement are literally, matters of life and death for humanity and an important determinant of life quality. Organ trading, which can provide an alternative to organ donation, is legal only in Iran and prohibited in all the other countries. Besides, organ trade is not considered as an ethical alternative by organizations such as WHO. The concerns of those who oppose organ trading undoubtedly deserve a comprehensive debate. It can also be argued, however, that a rigorous theoretical discussion of these matters is a responsibility to the humanity. In this article, it is argued that, present arguments against organ markets are not conclusive.

Özet

Organ nakli ve dolayısıyla organ temini, insanlık için kelimenin asıl anlamıyla ölüm kalım meselesi ve insanlara sunulan yaşam kalitesinin çok önemli bir belirleyenidir. Organ bağışına alternatif olarak görülebilecek organ ticareti, dünyada sadece İran’da uygulanmakta olup, kalan tüm ülkeler tarafından yasaklanmıştır. Organ satışı ayrıca Dünya Sağlık Örgütü gibi konu ile ilgili kuruluşlar tarafından da etik açıdan uygun bir seçenek olarak görülmemektedir. Organ satışına karşı olanların, üzerine bir literatür inşa edilmiş etik ve pratik kaygıları hiç şüphesiz derinlemesine bir tartışmayı hak etmektedir. Öte yandan, karşıt görüşün hiç değilse teorik olarak tartışılmasının, insanlığa karşı sorumluluğun gereği olduğu da savunulabilir. Bu makalede organ ticaretinin etik olarak yanlışlığını savunan argümanların nihai bir nitelik taşımadığı savunulacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAMAN, S., ÇAĞATAY, H. (2020). THE ETHICAL AND PRACTICAL CONSEQUENCES OF ORGAN MARKET. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 34, 373–402. https://ajindex.com/articles/275440

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Agence de la Biomédecine, https://www.dondorganes.fr/questions/124/quelle-est-la-loi-sur-le-don-dorganes (05.03.2017).
  2. Alpınar-Şencan, Zümrüt (2016), “Reconsidering Kantian Argument Against Organ Selling”, Med Health Care and Philos, 19 (1), p. 21-31. An Open Letter to President Barack Obama, Secretary of Health and Human Services Sylvia Mathews Burwell, Attorney General Eric Holder and Leaders of Congress, https://www.ustransplantopenletter.org (02.12.2017).
  3. Bailey, Everton (1999), “Should the State Have Rights to Your Organs? Dissecting Brazil’s Mandatory Organ Donation Law”, The University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, 30 (3), p. 707-726.
  4. Barnett, Andrew H., Roger D. Blair and David L. Kaserman (1992), “Improving Organ Donation: Compensation versus Market”, Inquiry, 29 (3), p. 372-378. BBC News, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/937204.stm (4.11.2016).
  5. Borna, Shaheen (1987), “Morality and Marketing Human Organs”, Journal of Business Ethics, 6 (1), p. 37-44.
  6. Brecher, Bob (1990), “The Kidney Trade: or, the Customer is Always Wrong”, Journal of Medical Ethics, 16 (3), p. 120-123.
  7. Castro, L. D. (2003), “Commodification and Exploitation: Arguments in Favour of Compensated Organ Donation”, J Med Ethics, 29 (3), p. 142-146.
  8. Chadler, Jennifer A. (2005), “Priority Systems in the Allocation of Organs for Transplant: Should We Reward Those Who Have Previously Agreed to Donate?”, Health Law Journal, 13, p. 99-138.
  9. Cherry, Mark J. (2000), “Is a Market in Human Organs Necessarily Exploitative”, Public Affairs Quarterly, 12 (4), p. 337-360.
  10. Cohen, Cynthia B. (1999), “Selling Bits and Pieces of Humans to Make Babies: The Gift of the Magi Revisited”, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 24 (3), p. 288-306.
  11. Demirdöğen, Yavuz (2016), “How does Incentive Affect Donation Rates: Turkey Case”, Inquiry: Sarajevo Journal of Social Sciences, 2 (1), p. 175- 189. Demirdöğen, Yavuz (2017), Cost-Benefit Analysis of Kidney Donation Systems and Alternative Donation Proposal for Turkey (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi), Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  12. Din İşleri Yüksek Kurulu Başkanlığı (2017), http://www2.diyanet.gov.tr/dinisleriyuksekkurulu/Sayfalar/OrganNakli.aspx (02.03.2017).
  13. Dworkin, Gerald (1994), "Markets and Morals: The Case for Organ”, Morality, Harm, and the Law, (Boulder: Westview Press): 155-161.
  14. Epstein, M. (2011), “If I were a Rich Man, Could I sell a Pancreas? A Study in the Locus of Oppression”, Journal of Medical Ethics, 3