SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Acta Odontologica Turcica / 2013 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of temporomandibular joint positions in different malocclusions

Farklı malokluzyonlarda temporomandibular eklem pozisyonlarının değerlendirilmesi

Hande GÖRÜCÜ COŞKUNER
İlken KOCADERELİ
Pages
157–61
Publication Date
2013-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this review was to discuss the studies that have examined the temporomandibular joint position and shape in different malocclusions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Temporomandibular joint is a secondary joint that connects mandible to temporal bone.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Conventional radiographic imaging such as panoramic or transcranial radiographs, conventional tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, artrography or cone beam computed tomography can be used for the evaluation of the temporomandibular joint.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this review was to discuss the studies that have examined the temporomandibular joint position and shape in different malocclusions.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Malokluzyon · Mandibular Kondil · Oklüzyon

Abstract

Temporomandibular joint is a secondary joint that connects mandible to temporal bone. Conventional radiographic imaging such as panoramic or transcranial radiographs, conventional tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, artrography or cone beam computed tomography can be used for the evaluation of the temporomandibular joint. Although several studies have been done, relationship between the temporomandibular joint shape and position and occlusion could not be defined clearly, and the effect of occlusion to the morphology and position of the temporomandibular joint has not been fully understood. The aim of this review was to discuss the studies that have examined the temporomandibular joint position and shape in different malocclusions.

Özet

Temporomandibular eklem, alt çeneyi temporal kemiğe bağlayan sekonder bir eklemdir. Temporomandibular eklem değerlendirilmesinde panoramik filmler, transkraniyal filmler gibi geleneksel radyografik görüntüleme, geleneksel tomografi, manyetik rezonans görüntüleme, ultrasonografi, artrografi veya konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi görüntüleri kullanılabilmektedir. Temporomandibular eklem şekli, pozisyonu ve okluzyon arasındaki ilişkiyi değerlendiren birçok çalışma yapılmasına rağmen bu ilişki net olarak ortaya konamamış ve okluzyonun eklem morfolojisine ve pozisyonuna etkisi tam olarak anlaşılamamıştır. Bu derlemenin amacı farklı malokluzyonlarda temporomandibular eklem pozisyonunu ve şeklini inceleyen çalışmaları değerlendirmektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

COŞKUNER, H. G., KOCADERELİ, İ. (2013). Evaluation of temporomandibular joint positions in different malocclusions. Acta Odontologica Turcica, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 3, 157–61. https://ajindex.com/articles/265473

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Fanghänel J, Gedrange T. On the development, morphology and function of the temporomandibular joint in the light of the orofacial system. Ann Anat 2007;189:314-9.
  2. Wessely MA, Young MF. Magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint. Clinical Chiropractic 2008;11:37-44.
  3. Palacios E, Bell KA. Magnetic resonance of the temporomandibular joint: clinical considerations, radiography, management. Stuttgart: G. Thieme Verlag; 1990. Dawson PE. A classification system for occlusions that relates maximal intecuspation to the position and condition of the temporomandibular joints. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:60-6.
  4. Manfredini D, Guarda-Nardini L. Ultrasonography of the temporomandibular joint: a literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:1229-36.
  5. Hilgers ML, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:803-11. Blackwood HJJ. Cellular remodelling in articular tissue. J Dent Res 1966;45:480-9.
  6. Folke LE, Stallard RE. Condylar adaptation to a change in intermaxillary relationship. J Periodontal Res 1966;1:79-89.
  7. McNamara JA Jr., Carlson DS. Quantitative analysis of temporomandibular joint adaptations to protrusive function. Am J Orthod 1979;76:593-611.
  8. Woodside DG, Metaxas A, Altuna G. The Influence of functional appliance therapy on glenoid fossa remodeling. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:181-98.
  9. Vitral RW, Fraga MR, de Oliveira RS, de Andrade Vitral JC. Temporomandibular joint alterations after correction of a unilateral posterior crossbite in a mixed-dentition patient: a computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:395-9. Mongini F. Dental abrasion as a factor in remodeling of the mandibular condyle. Acta Anat (Basel) 1975;92:292-300.
  10. Wedel A, Carlsson GE, Sagne S. Temporomandibular joint morphology in a medieval skull material. Swed Dent J 1978;2:177-87.
  11. Matsumoto MA, Bolognese AM. Bone morphology of the temporomandibular joint and its relation to dental occlusion. Braz Dent J 1995;6:115-22.
  12. Myers DR, Barenie JT, Bell RA, Williamson EH. Condylar position in children with functional posterior crossbites: before and after crossbite correction. Pediatr Dent 1980;2:190-4. Mongini F. Influence of function on temporomandibular joint remodeling and degenerative disease. Dent Clin North Am 1983;27:479-94.
  13. Mongini F, Schmid W. Treatment of mandibular asymmetries during growth