SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

The Adaptation of “Attitudes toward Research ATR ” Scale into Turkish

ARAŞTIRMAYA YÖNELİK TUTUM ÖLÇEĞİ’NİN TÜRKÇEYE UYARLANMASI

Suat YAPALAK
Gökhan ILGAZ
Pages
79–90
Publication Date
2013-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For the total scale, Cronbach Alpha coefficient was revealed .92

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to adapt The Scale of Attitude toward Research ATR , which was developed by Papanastasiou 2005 , to Turkish culture.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to determine whether the Turkish translation of scale was appropriate in terms of language or not, English and Turkish forms of scale were applied to 25, third year students who participated voluntarily studying in English language teaching department for two weeks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For the total scale, Cronbach Alpha coefficient was revealed .92
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Scale adaptation · factor structure · attitudes toward research

Abstract

The aim of this study is to adapt The Scale of Attitude toward Research ATR , which was developed by Papanastasiou 2005 , to Turkish culture. In order to determine whether the Turkish translation of scale was appropriate in terms of language or not, English and Turkish forms of scale were applied to 25, third year students who participated voluntarily studying in English language teaching department for two weeks. The language validity provided scale was put through Confirmatory Factor Analysis CFA with the data obtained from 391 people, and item total correlation and item discrimination were examined. According to CFA and item analysis results, the scale has maintained its original form in Turkish culture. For the total scale, Cronbach Alpha coefficient was revealed .92

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Papanastasiou 2005 tarafından geliştirilen “Araştırmaya Yönelik Tutum AYT ” ölçeğini Türk kültürüne uyarlamaktır. Ölçeğin Türkçe çevirisinin dil açısından uygun olup olmadığının belirlenmesi için İngilizce Öğretmenliği Bölümü 3. sınıf öğrencilerinden gönüllü olarak katılan 25 öğrenciye iki hafta arayla ölçeğin İngilizce ve Türkçe formu uygulanmıştır. Dil geçerliği sağlanan ölçek, 391 kişiden elde edilen verilerle doğrulayıcı faktör analizine DFA tutulmuş ve madde-toplam korelasyonları ile madde ayırt ediciliklerine bakılmıştır. Elde edilen DFA ve madde analizi sonuçlarına göre ölçek Türk kültüründe orijinal yapısını korumaktadır. Ölçeğin tümü için Cronbach Alpha güvenirlik katsayısı .92 olarak belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAPALAK, S., ILGAZ, G. (2013). The Adaptation of “Attitudes toward Research ATR ” Scale into Turkish. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 79–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/263514

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2000). Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: reasoned and automatic processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11 (1), 1-33.
  2. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis: For Applied Research. NY: Guilford Press.
  3. Browne, M. W., & CUDECK, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. K.A.Bollen and J.S.Long (Ed.ler), Testing Structural Models. Newbury Park: Sage. Buyukozturk, S., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel arastırma yontemleri [Scientific research methods]. Ankara:
  4. PegemA Yayıncılık Coleman, H. V., & Dickerson, J. (2008). Teachers learning research: Does online instruction impact anxiety and comprehension?. NCARE 2008 Annual Conference Retrieved September, 9, 2010 http://education.uncc.edu/ncare/Preceeding2008/ Papers/NCARE_2008_Proceedings_Coleman.pdf. Deryakulu, D., & Buyukozturk, S. (2002). Epistemolojik inanç ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Validity and reliability study of epistemological belief scale]. Egitim Arastırmaları-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 8, 111- 125. Mizock, L., & Harkins, D. (2009). Relationships of research attitudes, racial identity, and cultural mistrust. American Journal of Psychological Research, 5 (1), 31-51.
  5. Ferguson, M. J. (2002). The fluidity of implicitly measured attitudes: contextual dependence through cognitive and motivational dynamics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University, New York, USA. Inac, H. (2007). Bilim ve arastirma [Science and research]. D. Ekiz. (Ed.), Bilimsel arastirma yontemleri [Scientific research methods], (pp. 9-28). İstanbul:
  6. Lisans Yayıncilik. Morgan, C. T. (1977). Psikolojiye giris [A Brief Introduction to Psychology].(16th ed.) (Husnu Arıcı and others, Trans.), Ankara: H.Ü. Psikoloji Bölümü Yayınları Ozdamar, K. (2004). Paket programlar ile istatiksel veri analizi-1[Statical data analysis whit packet software].(expanded 5th ed. ). Eskişehir: Kaan Kitapevi. Papanastasiou, E. C. (2005). Factor structure of the ‘attitudes towards research’ scale. Statistics Education Research Journal, 4 (1), 16-26.
  7. Papanastasiou, E. C., & Zembylas, M. (2008). Anxiety in undergraduate research methods courses: its nature and implications. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 31(2), 155-167.
  8. Saracaloglu, A. S., Varol, S. R., & Ercan, I. E. (2005). Lisansustu egitim ogrencilerinin arastirma kaygilari, arastirma ve istatistige yonelik tutumlari ile arastırma ye