Journals / Çocuk Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

Diagnostic Approach to Urticaria and Angioedema in Children

Çocuklarda Ürtiker ve Anjiyoödeme Tanısal Yaklaşım

Pages
1–9
Publication Date
2018-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Herein, the diagnostic approach to urticaria and angioedema was evaluated in the context of current information

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Urticaria is a disease that can be seen at any age, with sudden onset, itchy redness, and rashes and / or angioede- ma.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Angioedema can not only involve mucous membranes but also the skin.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Herein, the diagnostic approach to urticaria and angioedema was evaluated in the context of current information
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anjiyoödem · çocuk · ürtiker

Abstract

Urticaria is a disease that can be seen at any age, with sudden onset, itchy redness, and rashes and / or angioede- ma. Angioedema can not only involve mucous membranes but also the skin. A large number of factors play a role in etiology, but often its etiology can not be detected in child- ren. The most important point in the success of treatment is making the correct diagnosis. For this reason, the diagno- sis should be made with patience and a thorough systema- tic evaluation. Both cases can cause serious concern both in the family and in the patient. Herein, the diagnostic approach to urticaria and angioedema was evaluated in the context of current information

Özet

Ürtiker her yaşta görülebilen, ani başlangıçlı, deride kaşıntılı kızarıklıklar ve kabartılarla ve/veya anjiyo ödem ile seyreden bir hastalıktır. Anjiyoödem ise yalnızca deriyi değil mukozaları da tutabilir. Etiyolojide çok sayıda faktör rol oynamakla beraber, çocuklarda neden çoğu kez belirle- nemez. Tedavi başarısındaki en önemli nokta, tanının doğru konulmasıdır. Bu nedenle tanı sabırla ve tam bir sistematik değerlendirme ile konulmalıdır. Her iki durumda hem aile de hem de hastada ciddi kaygıya neden olmakta- dır. Burada ürtiker ve anjiyoödeme tanısal yaklaşım güncel bilgiler eşliğinde değerlendirildi

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZÇEKER, D. (2018). Diagnostic Approach to Urticaria and Angioedema in Children. Çocuk Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 1–9. https://ajindex.com/articles/246896

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Bernstein JA, Lang DM, Khan DA, Craig T, Khan DA, Dreyfus D, et al. The diagnosis and management of acute and chronic urticaria: 2014 update. Practice Parameter. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133:1270-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2014.02.036 Saini SS. Urticaria and angioedema. Adkinson NF, Bochner BS, Burks AW, Busse WW, Holgate ST, Lemanske RF, O’Hehir RE (eds.) Middleton’s Allergy Principles and Practice. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, (2014) s. 575-88.
  2. Kaplan AP, Greaves MW. Angioedema. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;53:373-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2004.09.032 Greaves MW. Chronic urticaria in childhood. Allergy. 2000;55:309-20. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1398-9995.2000.00116.x
  3. Zuberbier T, Aberer W, Asero R, Bindslev-Jensen C, Brzoza Z, Canonica GW, et al. The EAACI/GA(2) LEN/EDF/WAO Guideline for the definition, classifi- cation, diagnosis, and management of urticaria: the 2013 revision and update. Allergy. 2014;69:868-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12313
  4. Greaves MW, Lawlor F. Angioedema: manifestations and management. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991;25:155- 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0190-9622(91)70183-3
  5. Zuraw BL, Bernstein JA, Lang DM, Craing T, Dreyfus D, Hsieh F, et al. A focused parameter update: heredi- tary angioedema, acquired C1 inhibitor deficiency, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-associated angioedema. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131(6): 1491-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2013.03.034
  6. Gaig P, Olona M, Mu-oz Lejarazu D, Caballero MT, Domínguez FJ, Echechipia S, et al. Epidemiology of urticaria in Spain. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2004;14:214-20.
  7. Kjaer HF, Eller E, Host A, Andersen KE, Binslev- Jensen C. The prevalence of allergic diseases in an unselected group of 6-year-old children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2008;19:737-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3038.2008.00733.x
  8. Henz BM, Zuberbier T. New developments and pers- pectives. Hautarzt. 2000;51:302-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001050051039
  9. Bas M, Adams V, Suvorava T, Niehues T, Hoffmann TK, Kojda G. Non allergic angioedema: role of brady- kinin. Allergy. 2007;62:842-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01427.x Zuraw BL. Clinical practice. Hereditary angioedema. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1027-36. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp0803977
  10. Pite H, Wedi B, Borrego LM, Kapp A, Raap U. Management of childhood urticaria:current knowlege and practical recommendations. Acta Derm Venereol. 2013;93:500-8. https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-1573
  11. Mortureux P, Léauté-Labrèze C,