SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Verimlilik Dergisi / 2014 / Sayı: 1

PRODUCTIVITY EFFECTS OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT: A COMPARATIVE COINTEGRATION ANALYSIS WITH MULTIPLE STRUCTURAL BREAKS IN TURKEY, CHINA AND INDIA SAMPLE

YABANCI DOĞRUDAN YATIRIMLARIN VERİMLİLİK ETKİSİ: TÜRKİYE, ÇİN VE HİNDİSTAN ÖRNEKLEMİNDE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI ÇOKLU YAPISAL KIRILMALI EŞBÜTÜNLEŞME ANALİZİ

İsmet GÖÇER
Osman PEKER
Pages
7–40
Publication Date
2015-11-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the long run analysis; 10% increase in FDI leads to 0,3 % increase in Turkey; 0,4 % increase in China and 0,2 % increase in India with respect to TFP.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study effects of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) on countries’ Total Factor Productivity (TFP), are analyzed with the help of ‘multiple structural breaks unit root test of Carrion-i-Silvestre et al. (2009)’, ‘multiple structural breaks cointegration test of Maki (2012)’ and ‘dynamic ordinary least square method’ for Turkey, China and India by using 1980-2011 period data.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the empirical findings, series are non-stationary in level and it is observed that there is cointegration relationship between series.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the long run analysis; 10% increase in FDI leads to 0,3 % increase in Turkey; 0,4 % increase in China and 0,2 % increase in India with respect to TFP.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yabancı Doğrudan Yatırımlar · Toplam Faktör Verimliliği · Çoklu Yapısal Kırılmalı Zaman Serisi Analizi

Abstract

In this study effects of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) on countries’ Total Factor Productivity (TFP), are analyzed with the help of ‘multiple structural breaks unit root test of Carrion-i-Silvestre et al. (2009)’, ‘multiple structural breaks cointegration test of Maki (2012)’ and ‘dynamic ordinary least square method’ for Turkey, China and India by using 1980-2011 period data. According to the empirical findings, series are non-stationary in level and it is observed that there is cointegration relationship between series. As a result of the long run analysis; 10% increase in FDI leads to 0,3 % increase in Turkey; 0,4 % increase in China and 0,2 % increase in India with respect to TFP.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Yabancı Doğrudan Yatırımların (YDY), ülkelerin Toplam Faktör Verimlilikleri (TFV) üzerindeki etkileri, Türkiye, Çin ve Hindistan için, Carrion-i-Silvestre vd. (2009) çoklu yapısal kırılmalı birim kök testi, Maki (2012) çoklu yapısal kırılmalı eşbütünleşme testi ve dinamik en küçük kareler yöntemi yardımıyla, 1980-2011 dönemi verileriyle analiz edilmiştir. Ampirik bulgulara göre; serilerin düzey değerlerinde durağan olmadığı ve seriler arasında eşbütünleşme ilişkisinin varolduğu görülmüştür. Uzun dönem analizi sonucunda; YDY’deki %10’luk artışın TFV’yi Türkiye’de % 0,3; Çin’de % 0,4 ve Hindistan’da % 0,2 oranında arttırdığı tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖÇER, İ., PEKER, O. (2015). PRODUCTIVITY EFFECTS OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT: A COMPARATIVE COINTEGRATION ANALYSIS WITH MULTIPLE STRUCTURAL BREAKS IN TURKEY, CHINA AND INDIA SAMPLE. Verimlilik Dergisi, Sayı: 1, 7–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/24467

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. ALTENBURG, T., (2000), Linkages and Spillovers between Transnational Corporations and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Developing Countries: Opportunities and Best Policies, In UNCTAD, ed., TNC-SME Linkages for Development: Issues-Experiences- Best Practices. New York and Geneva: United Nations. • ARNOLD, J. ve JAVORCIK, B. S., (2007), “Does Services Liberalization Benefit Manufacturing Firms? Evidence from the Czech Republic”, Work Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 4109. • ARNOLD, J. ve JAVORCIK, B. S., (2009), “Gifted Kids or Pushy Parents? ForeignAcquisitions and Firm Performance in Indonesia”, Journal of International Economics, c. 79, s. 1, ss. 42-53. • AUDET, K. M. ve GAGNÉ, R., (2010), “Openess to Foreign Direct Investment and Productivity in Canada”, Productivity and Prosperity In Quebec, ss. 1-19. • BAI, J., PERRON, P., (2003), “Computation and Analysis of Multiple Structural Change Models”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, s. 18, ss. 1-22. • BARRELL, R ve PAIN, N., (1997), “Foreign Direct Investment, Technological Change and Economic Growth Within Europe”, Te Economic Journal, c. 107, s. 445, ss. 1770-1786. • BAY, M., SEYMEN OSKAY, C. ve Çiçek, E., (2007), “Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımları Türkiye’ye Çekmek İçin Yapılması Gereken Düzenlemeler”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Karaman İ. İ. B. F. Dergisi, c. 12, s. 9, ss. 253-263. • BLALOCK, G. ve GERTLER, P. J., (2008), “Welfare Gains from Foreign Direct Investment Through Technology Transfer to Local Suppliers”, Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, c. 74, s. 2, ss. 402-421. • BLOMSTRÖM, M. ve WOLFF, E. N., (1989), “Multinational Corporations And Productivity Convergence In Mexico”, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, Working Papers, ss. 89-28, New York University. • BLOMSTRÖM, M. ve KOKKO, A., (2003), “Human Capital and Inward FDI”, The European Institute of Japanese Studies, Working Paper Series, No. 167. • BORENSZTEIN, E., GREGORIA, J. D. ve Lee, J. W., (1998), “How Does Foreign Direct Investment Afect Economic Growth?”, Journal of International Economics, c. 45, s.1, ss. 115-138. • BOSWORTH, B. P. ve COLLINS, S. M., (2003), “The Empirics of Growth: An Update”, Brookins Papers on Economic Activity, c.2, s. 115. • BOZKURT, H. ve DURSUN, G., (2006), “Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri ile Yabancı Doğrudan Yatırım Akımları Arasındaki Etkileşim: Türkiye İçin Kointegrasyon Analizi, 1980-2004”, Journal of Knowledge Economy & Knowledge Management, s. 2, ss. 37-49. • CARRION-I-SILVESTRE, J. L.