Journals / Journal of Chemical Metrology / 2020 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

Primary level electrolytic conductivity measurements at National Metrology Institute of Turkey (TUBITAK UME)

Pages
42–51
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The accuracy of the system wasevaluated using the measurement of certified conductivity solutions and it was found that there was no significantdifference between the results at 95% confidence level.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:TUBITAK UME (National Metrology Institute of Turkey) Electrochemistry Laboratory established theprimary level electrolytic conductivity measurement system in 2018.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The cell constant wasdetermined as 0.57986 cm-1at 25 °C by using certified conductivity solutions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The accuracy of the system wasevaluated using the measurement of certified conductivity solutions and it was found that there was no significantdifference between the results at 95% confidence level.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

TUBITAK UME (National Metrology Institute of Turkey) Electrochemistry Laboratory established theprimary level electrolytic conductivity measurement system in 2018. The objective of this work is to prove theaccuracy of the established system with an acceptable uncertainty and to disseminate the traceability forelectrolytic conductivity measurements. While the accuracy of the system was tested with the certified conductivitysolutions, the accuracy of the software developed at TUBITAK UME was also tested. The cell constant wasdetermined as 0.57986 cm-1at 25 °C by using certified conductivity solutions. The accuracy of the system wasevaluated using the measurement of certified conductivity solutions and it was found that there was no significantdifference between the results at 95% confidence level. Finally, “Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to theexpression of uncertainty in measurement” and “EA-4/02 M: 2013 Evaluation of the Uncertainty of Measurementin Calibration” guides were used to form the uncertainty budget for primary level electrolytic conductivitymeasurements.

🔖

Cite This Article

LİV, L., UYSAL, E., FIÇICIOĞLU, F., ARİFOVİÇ, M. (2022). Primary level electrolytic conductivity measurements at National Metrology Institute of Turkey (TUBITAK UME). Journal of Chemical Metrology, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 42–51. https://ajindex.com/articles/236757

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. PTB (2000). Seminar Document: “Electrolytic Conductivity” 146.PTB-Seminar Document
  2. NIST special publication 260-142: Primary Standards and Standard Reference Materials for Electrolytic Conductivity; 2000
  3. E. Orru (2013). “Traceability of Electrolytic Conductivity measurements for ultrapure water “, PhD Thesis, Politecnico di Torino, Italy
  4. J. N. Sørensen (2000). “Establishment of a primary standard for electrolytic conductivity and new reference solutions”, Technical University of Denmark and DFM
  5. IUPAC (2001). Technical Report: Molality based primary standards of electrolytic conductivity
  6. BIPM (2008). Evaluation of measurement data — Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement”
  7. S. Seitz, P. Spitzer and R. J. C. Brown (2010). “CCQM-P111 study on traceable determination of practical salinity and mass fraction of major seawater components”, Accred. Qual. Assur. 15,9-17
  8. L. Vyskočil, M. Máriássy,, A. Reyes, M. Monroy, A.Vospělová, B. Magnusson, R. Pyykkö, E. Kardash, F. B. Gonzaga, I.C.S. Fraga, J.C. Lopes, W.B. Silva Jr, P.P. Borges, W.F.C. Rocha, F. Durbiano, E. Orrù, K.W. Pratt, P.T. Jakobsen, H.D. Jensen, J. Avnskjol, L.A. Konopelko, Y.A. Kustikov, V.I. Suvorov, S. Xiaoping, W. Hai1, S. Seitz, P. Spitzer, V. Gavrilkin, L. Prokopenko, O. Stennik, W. Kozlowski, J. Dumanska-Kulpa, I. Grzybowska, Y.A. Ovchinnikov, Z. N. Szilágyi and J. Fükö (2013). Final report on key comparison CCQMK92: Electrolytic conductivity at 0.05 S m−1 and 20 S m−1, Metrologia, 50, 0813.