Dergiler / Journal of Chemical Metrology / 2020 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

Primary level electrolytic conductivity measurements at National Metrology Institute of Turkey (TUBITAK UME)

Sayfa
42–51
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Finally, “Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to theexpression of uncertainty in measurement” and “EA-4/02 M: 2013 Evaluation of the Uncertainty of Measurementin Calibration” guides were used to form the uncertainty budget for primary level electrolytic conductivitymeasurements.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:TUBITAK UME (National Metrology Institute of Turkey) Electrochemistry Laboratory established theprimary level electrolytic conductivity measurement system in 2018.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The cell constant wasdetermined as 0.57986 cm-1at 25 °C by using certified conductivity solutions.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Finally, “Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to theexpression of uncertainty in measurement” and “EA-4/02 M: 2013 Evaluation of the Uncertainty of Measurementin Calibration” guides were used to form the uncertainty budget for primary level electrolytic conductivitymeasurements.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

TUBITAK UME (National Metrology Institute of Turkey) Electrochemistry Laboratory established theprimary level electrolytic conductivity measurement system in 2018. The objective of this work is to prove theaccuracy of the established system with an acceptable uncertainty and to disseminate the traceability forelectrolytic conductivity measurements. While the accuracy of the system was tested with the certified conductivitysolutions, the accuracy of the software developed at TUBITAK UME was also tested. The cell constant wasdetermined as 0.57986 cm-1at 25 °C by using certified conductivity solutions. The accuracy of the system wasevaluated using the measurement of certified conductivity solutions and it was found that there was no significantdifference between the results at 95% confidence level. Finally, “Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to theexpression of uncertainty in measurement” and “EA-4/02 M: 2013 Evaluation of the Uncertainty of Measurementin Calibration” guides were used to form the uncertainty budget for primary level electrolytic conductivitymeasurements.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

LİV, L., UYSAL, E., FIÇICIOĞLU, F., ARİFOVİÇ, M. (2022). Primary level electrolytic conductivity measurements at National Metrology Institute of Turkey (TUBITAK UME). Journal of Chemical Metrology, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 42–51. https://ajindex.com/articles/236757

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. PTB (2000). Seminar Document: “Electrolytic Conductivity” 146.PTB-Seminar Document
  2. NIST special publication 260-142: Primary Standards and Standard Reference Materials for Electrolytic Conductivity; 2000
  3. E. Orru (2013). “Traceability of Electrolytic Conductivity measurements for ultrapure water “, PhD Thesis, Politecnico di Torino, Italy
  4. J. N. Sørensen (2000). “Establishment of a primary standard for electrolytic conductivity and new reference solutions”, Technical University of Denmark and DFM
  5. IUPAC (2001). Technical Report: Molality based primary standards of electrolytic conductivity
  6. BIPM (2008). Evaluation of measurement data — Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement”
  7. S. Seitz, P. Spitzer and R. J. C. Brown (2010). “CCQM-P111 study on traceable determination of practical salinity and mass fraction of major seawater components”, Accred. Qual. Assur. 15,9-17
  8. L. Vyskočil, M. Máriássy,, A. Reyes, M. Monroy, A.Vospělová, B. Magnusson, R. Pyykkö, E. Kardash, F. B. Gonzaga, I.C.S. Fraga, J.C. Lopes, W.B. Silva Jr, P.P. Borges, W.F.C. Rocha, F. Durbiano, E. Orrù, K.W. Pratt, P.T. Jakobsen, H.D. Jensen, J. Avnskjol, L.A. Konopelko, Y.A. Kustikov, V.I. Suvorov, S. Xiaoping, W. Hai1, S. Seitz, P. Spitzer, V. Gavrilkin, L. Prokopenko, O. Stennik, W. Kozlowski, J. Dumanska-Kulpa, I. Grzybowska, Y.A. Ovchinnikov, Z. N. Szilágyi and J. Fükö (2013). Final report on key comparison CCQMK92: Electrolytic conductivity at 0.05 S m−1 and 20 S m−1, Metrologia, 50, 0813.