SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

The Profound Difference Concerning Flow in Achievement Orientations for High School Students

Merve Nur ŞAHAN
Ayşe AYPAY
Pages
305–318
Publication Date
2021-06-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results demonstrated that learning-goal orientation predicted flow experience positively and at a high level; however, there was no relation between performance-approach goal orientation and flow experience.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims at determining the relationship between achievement goal orientations and flow experiences in the academic context for high school students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After-wards, the relationships between learning and performance-approach goal orientations and flow experience were tested by structural equation modelling.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results demonstrated that learning-goal orientation predicted flow experience positively and at a high level; however, there was no relation between performance-approach goal orientation and flow experience.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Flow in Academic Context · Learning-Goal Orientation · Performance-Goal Orientation

Abstract

This study aims at determining the relationship between achievement goal orientations and flow experiences in the academic context for high school students. In line with this purpose, Achievement Goal Orientation Scale and Flow Scale in the Academic Context were developed. After-wards, the relationships between learning and performance-approach goal orientations and flow experience were tested by structural equation modelling. The sample of this study consisted of 1916 students continu-ing their education in fourteen different state high schools in Turkey. Results demonstrated that learning-goal orientation predicted flow experience positively and at a high level; however, there was no relation between performance-approach goal orientation and flow experience. The results were interpreted in the light of literature, and suggestions for future research were presented.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHAN, M. N., AYPAY, A. (2021). The Profound Difference Concerning Flow in Achievement Orientations for High School Students. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 305–318. https://ajindex.com/articles/230458

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals structures and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychol-ogy, 84(3), 261-271. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261 Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260-267. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.26 Asakawa, K. (2004). Flow experience and autotelic personality in Japanese college students: How do they experience challenges in daily life? Journal of Happiness Studies, 5(2), 123-154. doi:10.1023/B:JOHS.0000035915.97836.89 Asakawa, K. (2010). Flow experience, culture, and well-being: How do autotelic Japanese college stu-dents feel, behave, and think in their daily lives? Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(2), 205-223. doi:10.1007/s10902-008-9132-3
  2. Brown, T.A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Publications, Inc. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2015). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni SPSS uygula-maları ve yorum. Ankara:
  3. Pegem Akademi. Carli, M., Delle Fave, A., & Massimini, F. (1988I). The quality of experience in the flow channels: Com-parison of Italian and U.S. students. In M. Csikszentmihalyi, & I. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience (pp. 288–306).
  4. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993).
  6. Talented teenagers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040-1048. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040 Dweck, C. S., & Elliot, E. (1983). Achievement motivation. In P. Mussen, & E. M. Heatherington (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 643-691). New York: Wiley. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psycho-logical Review, 95(2), 256-273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256 Dysvik, A., & Kuvaas, B. (2012). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation as predictors of work effort: The mod-erating role of achievement goals. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(3), 412-430. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02090.x Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement moti-vation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218-232. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218 Elliott, E. S., & Dwe