Dergiler / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

The Profound Difference Concerning Flow in Achievement Orientations for High School Students

Sayfa
305–318
Yayın Tarihi
2021-06-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results were interpreted in the light of literature, and suggestions for future research were presented.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aims at determining the relationship between achievement goal orientations and flow experiences in the academic context for high school students.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:After-wards, the relationships between learning and performance-approach goal orientations and flow experience were tested by structural equation modelling.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results were interpreted in the light of literature, and suggestions for future research were presented.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Flow in Academic Context · Learning-Goal Orientation · Performance-Goal Orientation

Abstract

This study aims at determining the relationship between achievement goal orientations and flow experiences in the academic context for high school students. In line with this purpose, Achievement Goal Orientation Scale and Flow Scale in the Academic Context were developed. After-wards, the relationships between learning and performance-approach goal orientations and flow experience were tested by structural equation modelling. The sample of this study consisted of 1916 students continu-ing their education in fourteen different state high schools in Turkey. Results demonstrated that learning-goal orientation predicted flow experience positively and at a high level; however, there was no relation between performance-approach goal orientation and flow experience. The results were interpreted in the light of literature, and suggestions for future research were presented.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ŞAHAN, M. N., AYPAY, A. (2021). The Profound Difference Concerning Flow in Achievement Orientations for High School Students. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 305–318. https://ajindex.com/articles/230458

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals structures and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychol-ogy, 84(3), 261-271. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261 Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260-267. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.26 Asakawa, K. (2004). Flow experience and autotelic personality in Japanese college students: How do they experience challenges in daily life? Journal of Happiness Studies, 5(2), 123-154. doi:10.1023/B:JOHS.0000035915.97836.89 Asakawa, K. (2010). Flow experience, culture, and well-being: How do autotelic Japanese college stu-dents feel, behave, and think in their daily lives? Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(2), 205-223. doi:10.1007/s10902-008-9132-3
  2. Brown, T.A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Publications, Inc. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2015). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni SPSS uygula-maları ve yorum. Ankara:
  3. Pegem Akademi. Carli, M., Delle Fave, A., & Massimini, F. (1988I). The quality of experience in the flow channels: Com-parison of Italian and U.S. students. In M. Csikszentmihalyi, & I. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience (pp. 288–306).
  4. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993).
  6. Talented teenagers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040-1048. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040 Dweck, C. S., & Elliot, E. (1983). Achievement motivation. In P. Mussen, & E. M. Heatherington (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 643-691). New York: Wiley. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psycho-logical Review, 95(2), 256-273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256 Dysvik, A., & Kuvaas, B. (2012). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation as predictors of work effort: The mod-erating role of achievement goals. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(3), 412-430. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02090.x Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement moti-vation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218-232. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218 Elliott, E. S., & Dwe