Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2014 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Effect of ultrasound energy applied during uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery on foveal volume and thickness

Komplikasyonsuz fakoemülsifikasyon cerrahisi sırasında uygulanan ultrason enerjisinin foveal volüm ve kalınlık üzerine etkisi

Pages
23–27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, there was no significant relationship between MFT and FV increase and UST and EFT

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To evaluate the effect of ultrasound time (UST) and effective phaco time (EPT), during uncomplicated phacoemul- sification surgery, on minimum foveal thickness (MFT) and foveal volume (FV) measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the early postoperative period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed, 42 eyes of 42 patients who underwent uncomplicated phacoemul- sification surgery from the patient files.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, there was no significant relationship between MFT and FV increase and UST and EFT
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of ultrasound time (UST) and effective phaco time (EPT), during uncomplicated phacoemul- sification surgery, on minimum foveal thickness (MFT) and foveal volume (FV) measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the early postoperative period. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed, 42 eyes of 42 patients who underwent uncomplicated phacoemul- sification surgery from the patient files. The phacoemulsification was performed using the Alcon InfinitiTM Vision System. UST and EPT values detected during uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery were recorded. MFT and FV values were measured by OCT preoperatively and on the postoperative 1st day, and at 2nd, 4th, and 14th weeks. Results: A statistically significant improvement in visual acuity was found in all eyes on the postoperative 1st day, and at the 2nd, 4th, 14th weeks (p<0.005). MFT and FV values were significantly increased on the postoperative 2nd, 4th and 14th weeks compared to the preoperative period (p<0.005). Mean UST and EPT values detected during surgery were 128.71±44.47 sec, and 22.02±8.39 sec respectively. UST and EPT values were not positively correlated with the MFT and FV values. Conclusion: There was a significant increase in MFT and FV values after uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery. However, there was no significant relationship between MFT and FV increase and UST and EFT

Özet

Amaç: Komplikasyonsuz fakoemülsifikasyon cerrahisi sırasında tespit edilen toplam ultrason zamanı (USZ) ve efektif fako zamanının (EFZ) ameliyat sonrası erken dönemde minimum foveal kalınlık (MFK) ve foveal volüm (FV) üzerine etkisinin optik koherens tomografi (OKT) ile değerlendirilmesi. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada komplikasyonsuz fakoemülsifikasyon cerrahisi uygulanan 42 hastanın 42 gözüne ait so- nuçlar hasta dosyalarından geriye dönük olarak incelendi. Ameliyatlar Alcon InfinitiTM Vision System fakoemülsifikasyon cihazı kullanılarak yapıldı. Fakoemülsifikasyon cerrahisi sırasında tespit edilen USZ ve EFZ değerleri kaydedildi. Hastala- rın ameliyat öncesi ve ameliyat sonrası 1. gün, 2. hafta, 4. hafta ve 14. haftada MFK ve FV değerleri OKT ile tespit edildi. Bulgular: Hastaların ameliyat sonrası 1. gün, 2. hafta, 4. hafta ve 14. hafta takiplerinde gözlerin tamamında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir görme artışı saptandı (p<0.005). Ameliyat sonrası 2. hafta, 4. hafta ve 14. haftada ameliyat öncesine göre MFK ve FV değerlerinin anlamlı şekilde arttığı izlendi (p<0.005). Ameliyat sırasında tespit edilen ortalama USZ ve EFZ değerleri sırasıyla 128.71±44.47 sn ve 22.02±8.39 sn idi. USZ ve EFZ değerleri ile MFK ve FV değerleri arasında pozitif korelasyon saptanmadı. Sonuç: Komplikasyonsuz fakoemülsifikasyon cerrahisinden sonra tüm hastalarda MFK ve FV artışı olmaktadır. Ancak MFK ve FV artışı ile USZ ve EFZ arasında anlamlı bir ilişki tespit edilmemiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DURU, N., ŞAHİN, M. H., SARICAOĞLU, M. S., DURU, Z., ULUSOY, D. M., KALAYCI, D. (2014). Effect of ultrasound energy applied during uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery on foveal volume and thickness. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 23–27. https://ajindex.com/articles/226469

References (17)

  1. American Academy of Ophtalmology, Retina and Vitreus sec- tion 2003-2004;12:144-6
  2. Yanoff M, Duker J. Ophtalmology 2nd edition. 2007. Massa- chucuest, USA. 2007:813-9
  3. Karel F: Fakoemülsifikasyonda avantaj-dezavantaj, endi- kasyon-kontraendikasyon TOD XXVIII. Ulusal Kongre Bül- teni. 1. cilt Antalya 1994;67-9
  4. Rosetti L, Autelitano A. Cystoid macular edema following cat- aract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2000;11:65-72
  5. Rosetti L, Chaudhuri J, Dickersin K. Medical prophylaxis and treatment of cystoid macular edema after cataract surgery: the results of a meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 1998;105:397-405
  6. Norregaard JC, Bernth-Petersen P, Bellan L, et al. Intraop- erative clinical practice and risk of early complications after cataract extraction in the United States, Canada, Denmark, and Spain. Ophthalmology 1999;106:42-8
  7. Sourdille P, Santiago PY. Optical coherence tomography of macular thickness after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:256-61
  8. Stifter E, Menapace R, Neumayer T, et al. Macular morphol- ogy after cataract surgery with primary posterior capsu- lorhexis and posterior optic buttonholing. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;146:15-22
  9. Lobo CL, Faria PM, Soares MA, et al. Macular alterations af- ter small-incision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:752-60
  10. Munuera JM, Garcia-Layana A, Maldonado MJ, et al. Optical coherence tomography in successful surgery of vitreomacular traction syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:1388-9
  11. Ursell PG, Spalton DJ, Whitcup SM, et al. Cystoid macular edema after phacoemulsification: relation ship to blood-aque- ous barrier damage and visual acuity. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:1492-7
  12. Gulkilik G, Kocabora S, Taskapili M, et al. Cystoid macular edema after phacoemulsification:risk factors and effect on vi- sual acuity. Can J Ophthalmol 2006;41:699-703
  13. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, et al. Optical coherence to- mography. Science 1991;254:1178-81
  14. Hee MR, Izatt JA, Swanson EA, et al. Optical coherence tomog- raphy of the human retina. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:325-32
  15. Browning DJ, McOwen MD, Bowen RM, et al. Comparison of the clinical diagnosis of diabetic macular edema with di- agnosis by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2004;111:712-5
  16. Brown JC, Solomon SD, Bressler SB, et al. Detection of diabetic foveal edema: contact lens biomicroscopy compared with opti- cal coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:330-5
  17. Nicholas S, Riley