Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2012 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Clinical comparison of rebound tonometer with goldmann applanation tonometer: Effects of central corneal thickness

Rebound tonometresi ve goldmann applanasyon tonometresinin klinik olarak karşılaştırılması: Santral kornea kalınlığının etkisi

Pages
177–183
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Hastaların SKK ölçümleri OHTS kriterlerine göre 3 gruba ayrıldı: SKK

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Amaç: Bu klinik çalışma rebound tonometresi ile Goldmann applanasyon tonometresi (GAT) göz içi basıncı (GİB) ölçümlerinin karşılaştırılması ve her iki cihazın GİB ölçümlerinin santral kornea kalınlığı (SKK) üzerine olan etkisini değerlendirmek amacıyla planlanmıştır.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Metod: Yüzaltmışbeş sağlıklı birey iki gözlemci tarafından rebound tonometresi ve GAT kullanılarak test edildi.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Hastaların SKK ölçümleri OHTS kriterlerine göre 3 gruba ayrıldı: SKK
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Amaç: Bu klinik çalışma rebound tonometresi ile Goldmann applanasyon tonometresi (GAT) göz içi basıncı (GİB) ölçümlerinin karşılaştırılması ve her iki cihazın GİB ölçümlerinin santral kornea kalınlığı (SKK) üzerine olan etkisini değerlendirmek amacıyla planlanmıştır. Metod: Yüzaltmışbeş sağlıklı birey iki gözlemci tarafından rebound tonometresi ve GAT kullanılarak test edildi. Hastaların SKK ölçümleri OHTS kriterlerine göre 3 gruba ayrıldı: SKK

Özet

Purpose: This clinical study was conducted to compare the performance of a rebound tonometer with that of the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) in the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) and to evaluate the effect of central corneal thickness (CCT) on IOP measurement with both devices. Materials and Methods: One hundred and sixty-five healthy subjects were tested using rebound tonometer and GAT by two observers. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to CCT measurement and OHTS criteria as follows: group 1 with CCT

🔖

Cite This Article

AKÇA, S. B., AKOVA, Y. A., AKMAN, A., ÇETİNKAYA, A., YAMAN, E. P., TEKİNDAL, M. A. (2022). Clinical comparison of rebound tonometer with goldmann applanation tonometer: Effects of central corneal thickness. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 177–183. https://ajindex.com/articles/525788

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Leske MC. The epidemiology of open-angle glaucoma: a review. Am J Epidemiol 1983;118:166-91
  2. Shields MB, Ritch R, Krupin T. Classification of glaucomas. In: Ritch R, Shields MP, Krupin T (eds). The glaucomas. Mosby: St. Louis 1996;717-25
  3. Dielemans I, Vingerling JR, Hofman A, et al. Reliability of intraocular pressure measurement with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in epidemiological studies. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1994;232:141-4
  4. Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 1993;38:1-30
  5. Kontiola AI, Goldblum D, Mittag T, et al. The induction/impact tonometer: a new instrument to measure intraocular pressure in the rat. Exp Eye Res 2001;73:781-5
  6. Kontiola AI. A new induction-based impact method for measuring intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2000;78:142-5
  7. Danias J, Kontiola AI, Filippopoulos T, et al. Method for the noninvasive measurement of intraocular pressure in mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:1138-41
  8. Kontiola A. A new electromechanical method for measuring intraocular pressure. Doc Ophthalmol 1996-1997;93:265-76
  9. Kontiola A, Puska P. Measuring intraocular pressure with the Pulsair 3000 and Rebound tonometers in elderly patients without an anesthetic. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2004;242:3-7
  10. Goldblum D, Kontiola AI, Mittag T, et al. Non-invasive determination of intraocular pressure in the rat eye. Comparison of an electronic tonometer (TonoPen), and a rebound (impact probe) tonometer. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002;240:942-6
  11. Kontiola AI, Goldblum D, Mittag T, et al. The induction/impact tonometer: a new instrument to measure intraocular pressure in the rat. Exp Eye Res 2001;73:781-5
  12. Iliev ME, Goldblum D, Katsoulis K, et al. Comparison of rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry and correlation with central corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:833-5
  13. Fernandes P, Diaz-Rey JA, Queiros A, et al. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2005;25:436-40
  14. Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, et al. Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 2006;15:213-7
  15. Poostchi A, Mitchell R, Nicholas S, et al. The Icare rebound tonometer: comparisons with Goldmann tonometry, and influence of central corneal thickness. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2009;37:687-91
  16. Pelit A, Alta