SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı:

A Discourse Analysis of Social Media Voices on Turkey’s FATIH Project

Ayşe AYDIN AKKURT
Hakan YILDIRIM
H. Mustafa DÖNMEZ
Pages
785–806
Publication Date
2019-04-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that FATIH project has been discussed in public sphere in terms of technological, political-ideological and project design dimensions rather than the educational dimension.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:FATIH project of Turkey is one of the largest educational technology projects in the world that aims to ensure equality in education and to improve technological infrastructure at schools.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 307 entries posted between 2010 and 2017 were analyzed using the method of discourse analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that FATIH project has been discussed in public sphere in terms of technological, political-ideological and project design dimensions rather than the educational dimension.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:FATIH Project · New Media · Discourse Analysis

Özet

FATIH project of Turkey is one of the largest educational technology projects in the world that aims to ensure equality in education and to improve technological infrastructure at schools. Ekşi Sözlük, one of the most popular social media platforms in Turkey, has been an important agent in interpreting and reproducing information as a new public sphere. This study aims to explore the topics presented within the discourses in Ekşi Sözlük regarding FATIH project. A total of 307 entries posted between 2010 and 2017 were analyzed using the method of discourse analysis. The results showed that FATIH project has been discussed in public sphere in terms of technological, political-ideological and project design dimensions rather than the educational dimension.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKKURT, A. A., YILDIRIM, H., DÖNMEZ, H. M. (2019). A Discourse Analysis of Social Media Voices on Turkey’s FATIH Project. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı:, 785–806. https://ajindex.com/articles/217950

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akgül, M. (2013). FATIH Project: Problems, Risks and Concerns [FATIH Projesi: Sorunlar, Riskler ve Endişeler]. http://dergi.bmo.org.tr/egitim/FATIH-projesi-sorunlar-riskler-ve-endiseler Accessed on May 5, 2017.
  2. Akgün, E., Yılmaz, E.O., and Seferoğlu, S.S. (2011). Vision 2023 strategy document and the movement to increase opportunities and improve technology (FATİH) project: A comparative review [Vizyon 2023 strateji belgesi ve fırsatları artırma ve teknolojiyi iyileştirme hareketi (FATİH) projesi: Karşılaştırmalı bir inceleme]. Akademik Bilişim, 2(4), 115-122.
  3. Atabek, Ü. (2005). New Communication Technologies and Media [Yeni İletişim Teknolojileri ve Medya]. İstanbul:
  4. IPS İletişim Vakfı Yayınları Armağan, A. and Deniz, Ş. (2012). Representation of child abuse on social networking platforms: presentation of children staying in Pozanti juvenile hall on ekşi sözlük. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 5(7). Alexa (2018) http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/eksisozluk.com, Web, accessed in February 15, 2018.
  5. Ayvacı, H.Ş., Bakırcı, H., and Başak, M.H. (2014). The evaluation of problems emerging during the implementation process of fatih project by administrators, teachers and students. YYU J. Educ. Faculty, 9, 21-47.
  6. Bozkurt, A. (2014). Network society and knowledge. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 28(4), 510-525.
  7. Coruk, A., and Tutkun, T. (2018). Teacher Concerns towards the Fatih Project in Education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 17(4), 42-53.
  8. Çelik, H. and Ekşi, H. (2008). Discourse analysis. Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, (27), 99-117.
  9. Çiftçi, S., Musa Taşkaya, S., and Alemdar, M. (2013). The opinions of classroom teachers about Fatih Project. Ilkogretim Online, 12(1). Demir, F. (2011). The role of negotiation in public policy making process and the democratization of public policy process [Kamu politikası oluşturma sürecinde “müzakere” nin rolü ve kamu politikası sürecinin demokratikleştirilmesi], (Ed. Alican Kaptı) Kamu Politika Süreci. Seçkin, Ankara.
  10. Doğan, D., Çınar, M. and Seferoğlu, S.S. (2016). “One Laptop per Child” projects and FATIH project: A comparative examination. SDU International Journal of Educational Studies, 3(1), 1-26.
  11. Donmuş Kaya, V., & Pepeler, E. (2018). An investigation of some variables in terms of teacher’s competencies about using interactive whiteboard. Firat University Journal of Social Sciences, 28(2). Dursun, Ö.Ö., Kuzu, A., Kurt, A.A., Güllüpınar, F., and Gültekin, M. (2013). Views of sc