Journals / JAREM / 2012 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

Yaşlı hastalardaki femur boyun kırıklarında sementli ve sementsiz modüler başlı parsiyel protezlerin erken dönem fonksiyonel sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması

Cemented versus cementless modular head partial prostheses in femoral neck fractures of elderly patients: Comparison of early functional results

Journal
JAREM
Pages
1–5
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: We obtained similar early functional results with cemented and cementless modular head partial prostheses used in femoral neck frac- tures of elderly patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, we aimed to compare early functional results of cemented versus cementless modular head partial prostheses used in femo- ral neck fractures of elderly patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We included 28 (21 female and 7 male) elderly patients who were accessible for the functional scoring and were treated by use of modular head partial prostheses due to a femoral neck fracture in our hospital between 2006 and 2008.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: We obtained similar early functional results with cemented and cementless modular head partial prostheses used in femoral neck frac- tures of elderly patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to compare early functional results of cemented versus cementless modular head partial prostheses used in femo- ral neck fractures of elderly patients. Methods: We included 28 (21 female and 7 male) elderly patients who were accessible for the functional scoring and were treated by use of modular head partial prostheses due to a femoral neck fracture in our hospital between 2006 and 2008. Eleven hemiarthroplasties were cemented and 17 were cementless. Mean age was 74.6 years and mean follow-up period was 27 months. The Oxford hip scoring system was used for the functional evalua- tion of patients. Results: The mean Oxford score of the patient group treated with cemented modular head partial prostheses was 26.7 points and of the patient group treated with cementless modular head partial prostheses was 22.9 points. Mean Oxford scores and the distribution of patients in terms of Oxford classes showed no statistically significant difference between the cemented and the cementless groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: We obtained similar early functional results with cemented and cementless modular head partial prostheses used in femoral neck frac- tures of elderly patients.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızda, ileri yaş femur boyun kırıklı hastalarda uyguladığımız sementli ve sementsiz değişir baş parsiyel protezlerin erken dönem sonuç- ları fonksiyonel açıdan karşılaştırıldı. Yöntemler: Hastanemizde 2006-2008 yılları arasında femur boyun kırığı nedeniyle değişir baş parsiyel protez uygulanmış, kendilerine ulaşılarak skorla- maları yapılabilen 28 hasta (21 K, 7 E) çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastaların protezlerinin 11’i sementli, 17’si sementsiz idi. Ortalama yaş 74.6, ortalama takip süresi 27 ay idi. Değerlendirmede Oxford kalça skorlama sistemi kullanıldı. Bulgular: Sementli olarak uygulanan değişir baş parsiyel protezlerde Oxford skoru ortalaması 26.7, sementsiz uygulananlarda 22.9 olarak bulundu. Sementli ve sementsiz grupların Oxford skor ortalamaları ve skor dağılımları arasında istatistiksel olarak farklılık gözlenmedi (p>0.05). Sonuç: Femur boyun kırığı nedeni ile sementli ve sementsiz değişir baş parsiyel protez uyguladığımız ileri yaş hastalarda erken dönemde fonksiyonel açıdan benzer sonuçlar elde edildi.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZER, D., ÇİMEN, O., AYKUT, Ü. S., DOĞRULOĞLU, H., BALİOĞLU, M. B., KAYGUSUZ, M. A. (2012). Yaşlı hastalardaki femur boyun kırıklarında sementli ve sementsiz modüler başlı parsiyel protezlerin erken dönem fonksiyonel sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması. JAREM, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 1–5. https://ajindex.com/articles/214295

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Hay M, Gottschalk F. Cemented versus uncemented hip replacement for fracture of the hip. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 18-9. [CrossRef] 2. Kalairajah Y, Azurza K, Hulme C, Molloy S and Drabu KJ. Health Outcome Measures in the Evaluation of total Hip arthroplasties- A Comparison Between the Harris Hip Score and Oxford Hip Score. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 1037-41. [CrossRef] 3. Haidukewych GJ, Israel TA, Berry DJ. Long Term Survivorship of Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Fracture of the Femoral Neck. Clin Ortop Relat Res 2002; 403: 118-26. [CrossRef] 4. Dixon S, Bannister G. Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Intracapsuler Fracture in the Mobil Active Elderly Patient. Injury 2004; 35: 152-156. [CrossRef] 5. Lennox IAC, Mclauchlan J. Comparing the Mortality and Morbidity of Cemented and Uncemented Hemiarthroplasties. Injury 1993; 24: 185-6. [CrossRef] 6. Leighton RK, Schmidt AH, Collier P, Trask K. Advances in the Treatment of Intracapsular Hip Fractures in The Elderly. Injury 2007; 3853: 24-34. [CrossRef] 7. Gierer P, Landis J, Grubwinkler M, Gradl G, Lob G, Andress HJ. The Femoral Neck Fracture in the Elderly Patient- Cemented or Cementless Hip Arthroplasty? Zentralbl Chir 2002; 127: 514-8. [CrossRef] 8. Parvizi J, Ereth MH, Lewallen DG. Thirty- Day Mortality Following Hip Arthroplasty for Acute Fracture. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2004; 86: 1983-8. 9. Burwell RG, Dennis CN, Ross AF, Barnes JM, Barnes R, Braden M, et al. Acrylic Cement and the Cardiovascular System. Lancet 1974; 2: 1002-4. 10. McCaskie AW, Barnes MR, Lin E, Harper WM, Gregg PJ. Cement Pressurisation During Hip Replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1997; 79: 379-84. [CrossRef] 11. Bezwada HP, Shah AR, Harding SH, Baker J, Johanson NA, Mont MA. Cementless Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19: 73-7. [CrossRef] 12. Figved W, Opland V, Frihagen F, Jervidalo T, Madsen JE, Nordsletten L. Cemented versus Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Femroal Neck Fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467: 2426-35. [CrossRef] 13. Ahn J, Man LX, Park SD, Sadl JF, Esterhai JL. Systematic Review of Cemented and Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty Outcomes for Femoral Neck Fractures. Clin OrthoRelat Res 2008; 466: 2513-8. [CrossRef]