Journals / Mülkiye Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 269

The Birth of Journalism: Towards a Critical Historiography

Gazeteciliğin Doğuşu: Eleştirel Bir Tarihyazımına Doğru

Pages
29–66
Publication Date
2014-02-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In doing so, it aims at developinga critical historiography for journalism by particularly focusing on issues of class struggle,social control and de-politicisation which are deliberately abandoned in the liberal accounts.By challenging approaches celebrating “professional journalism” as a democratic triumphover the displacement of earlier forms of revolutionary and partisan press, this paper disclosesthe ideological implications and caveats of the liberal narrative of the history of journalism.Keywords: journalism, critical historiography, professionalism, objectivity, depoliticisation

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ÖzetBu yazı, gazeteciliğin profesyonel ve modern bir alan olarak ortaya çıkışını incelemektedir.Çalışmanın amacı, İngiliz ve Amerikan gazetecilik geleneklerinin toplumsal, ekonomik vesöylemsel olarak şekillendiği sürecin izini sürerek, basın tarihine yönelik liberal anlatıda gözardı edilen sınıf savaşımı, toplumsal denetim ve depolitizasyon gibi unsurların gazetecilikalanının oluşumundaki rolünü ortaya koymaktır.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It offers a theoretical debate on the conditions of journalismby tracing back various social, economic and discursive formations of British and Americanjournalistic traditions from 16th to the mid-20th centuries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In doing so, it aims at developinga critical historiography for journalism by particularly focusing on issues of class struggle,social control and de-politicisation which are deliberately abandoned in the liberal accounts.By challenging approaches celebrating “professional journalism” as a democratic triumphover the displacement of earlier forms of revolutionary and partisan press, this paper disclosesthe ideological implications and caveats of the liberal narrative of the history of journalism.Keywords: journalism, critical historiography, professionalism, objectivity, depoliticisation
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:gazetecilik · eleştirel tarihyazımı · profesyonelleşme

Özet

ÖzetBu yazı, gazeteciliğin profesyonel ve modern bir alan olarak ortaya çıkışını incelemektedir.Çalışmanın amacı, İngiliz ve Amerikan gazetecilik geleneklerinin toplumsal, ekonomik vesöylemsel olarak şekillendiği sürecin izini sürerek, basın tarihine yönelik liberal anlatıda gözardı edilen sınıf savaşımı, toplumsal denetim ve depolitizasyon gibi unsurların gazetecilikalanının oluşumundaki rolünü ortaya koymaktır. Profesyonel gazetecilik modelini, devrimcive partizan basının yerinden edilmesiyle işaretlenen demokratik bir zafer olarak görenyaklaşımlara karşı çıkan bu yazı, liberal gazetecilik tarihi anlatısının ideolojik içerimlerine vetuzaklarına dikkat çekmektedir.Anahtar Sözcükler: gazetecilik, eleştirel tarihyazımı, profesyonelleşme, objektiflik,depolitizasyon AbstractThis paper delves into the historical conditions behind the emergence of journalism as aprofessional and modern practice. It offers a theoretical debate on the conditions of journalismby tracing back various social, economic and discursive formations of British and Americanjournalistic traditions from 16th to the mid-20th centuries. In doing so, it aims at developinga critical historiography for journalism by particularly focusing on issues of class struggle,social control and de-politicisation which are deliberately abandoned in the liberal accounts.By challenging approaches celebrating “professional journalism” as a democratic triumphover the displacement of earlier forms of revolutionary and partisan press, this paper disclosesthe ideological implications and caveats of the liberal narrative of the history of journalism.Keywords: journalism, critical historiography, professionalism, objectivity, depoliticisation

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞ, O. (2014). The Birth of Journalism: Towards a Critical Historiography. Mülkiye Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 269, 29–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/211902

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Arendt, H. (1958/1994). İnsanlık Durumu, çev. Bahadır Sina Şener, İstanbul:
  2. İletişim Yayınları.
  3. Asquith, I. (1978). “The Structure, Ownership and Control of the Press, 1780–1855.”
  4. Boyce, G. vd. (der.) Newspaper History: From 17th Century to the Present Day, Londra: Constable içinde, s. 98–116.
  5. Baldasty, Gerald J. (1992). The Commercialization of News in the Nineteenth Century, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.
  6. Black, Jeremy (2002). “The Press and Politics in the Eighteenth Century”, Media History C.8, S.2, s. 175–182.
  7. Boyce, G. (1978). “The Fourth Estate: The Reappraisal of a Concept”, Boyce, G. vd. (der.) Newspaper History: From 17th Century to the Present Day, Londra: Constable içinde, s. 19–40.
  8. Butterfield, Herbert (1931).
  9. The Whig Interpretation of History, Londra: Bell and Sons. Calhoun, C. (der.) (1993).
  10. Habermas and the Public Sphere, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  11. Carey, James (1974). “The Problem of Journalism History”, Journalism History C.1, S.1, s. 3–17.
  12. Chalaby, Jean (1998).
  13. The Invention of Journalism, New York: Palgrave-MacMillan. Conboy, Martin (2004). Journalism: A Critical History, Londra: Sage. Curran, J. (1977). “Capitalism and the Control of the Press”, Curran J. vd. (der.) Mass Communication and Society, Londra: Open University Press içinde. s. 195–230.
  14. Curran, J. (1978). “The Press as an Agency of Social Control: An Historical Perspective”, Boyce, G. vd. (der.) Newspaper History: From 17th Century to the Present Day, Londra: Constable içinde, s. 51–75.
  15. Curran, James (2002). “Media and the Making of British Society, c. 1700–2000”, Media History C.8, S.2, s. 135–154.
  16. Curran, James (2006).
  17. Media and Power, Londra & New York: Routledge. Dicken-Garcia, Hazel (1989). Journalistic Standards in Nineteenth-Century America, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.
  18. Gans, Herbert J. (1979). Deciding What’s News: A study of CBS evening news, NBC nightly news, Newsweek, and Time, New York: Pantheon. Gorman, Lyn ve David MacLean (2003). Media and Society in the Twentieth Century: A Historical Introduction, Oxford: Blackwell. Habermas, J. (1962/2003). Kamusallığın Yapısal Dönüşümü, çev. Tanıl Bora ve Mithat Sancar, İstanbul:
  19. İletişim. Hall, S. (1978). “Newspapers, Parties and Classes”, The British Press: A Manifesto. Curran J. (der.) Londra: MacMillan içinde, s. 29–52.
  20. Hall, S. (1981). “Notes on Deconstructing the ‘Popular’”, Samuel, R. (der.) People’s History and Socialist Theory, Londra: Routledge and Kegan Paul içinde, s. 227-240. Her