SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Mülkiye Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 271

Stephen Herbert Hymer: Globalization and the Theory of Multinational Corporation

Stephen Herbert Hymer: Küreselleşme ve Çok Uluslu Şirket Kuramı

Ali FIKIRKOCA
Gülnur YILDIRIM
Pages
101–136
Publication Date
2014-02-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally an evaluation ofhis contributions to international business and marxist literature together with some opposingcritics is being offered.Keywords: Internationalization, multinational enterprise, foreign direct investment,Stephen Herbert Hymer.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ÖzetŞirketlerin uluslararasılaşma süreçleri özellikle son yirmi yıldır çeşitli araştırma vetartışmalara konu olmaktadır.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Buna ek olarakyazarın çalışmalarının özellikle uluslararası işletmecilik ve Marksist yazın açsından katkılarıgeliştirilen kurama yönelik olumsuz eleştirilerle beraber değerlendirilmektedir.Anahtar sözcükler: Uluslararasılaşma, çokuluslu şirket, doğrudan yabancı yatırım,Stephen Hymer.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally an evaluation ofhis contributions to international business and marxist literature together with some opposingcritics is being offered.Keywords: Internationalization, multinational enterprise, foreign direct investment,Stephen Herbert Hymer.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Uluslararasılaşma · çokuluslu şirket · doğrudan yabancı yatırım

Özet

ÖzetŞirketlerin uluslararasılaşma süreçleri özellikle son yirmi yıldır çeşitli araştırma vetartışmalara konu olmaktadır. Çokuluslu şirket (ÇUŞ) olarak adlandırılan bazı şirketlerin devasaboyutlara ulaşması, onları hem akademik hem de siyasi alanlarda ilgi odağı haline getirmiştir.Bu makalede; çokuluslu şirketlerin uluslararası faaliyetleri hakkındaki başlıca kuramlardanbirisi olan Hymer’in kuramı incelenmiştir. Hymer’in görüşlerinin genel bir tanıtımı, ÇUŞkuramı ve küreselleşmenin politik ekonomisine dair temel savları ele alınmıştır. Buna ek olarakyazarın çalışmalarının özellikle uluslararası işletmecilik ve Marksist yazın açsından katkılarıgeliştirilen kurama yönelik olumsuz eleştirilerle beraber değerlendirilmektedir.Anahtar sözcükler: Uluslararasılaşma, çokuluslu şirket, doğrudan yabancı yatırım,Stephen Hymer. AbstractInternationalization processes of firms have been subject to several studies and debatesespecially over the last twenty years. The growth of the multinational companies (MNC) intovast dimensions; has brought them into focus both in the academic and political fields. Inthis article; Hymer’s theory which is one of the main theories on multinational enterprises’international activities had been analysed. The basic tenets of Hymer’s arguments about MNCtheory and the political economy of globalisation are summarised. Finally an evaluation ofhis contributions to international business and marxist literature together with some opposingcritics is being offered.Keywords: Internationalization, multinational enterprise, foreign direct investment,Stephen Herbert Hymer.

🔖

Cite This Article

FIKIRKOCA, A., YILDIRIM, G. (2014). Stephen Herbert Hymer: Globalization and the Theory of Multinational Corporation. Mülkiye Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 271, 101–136. https://ajindex.com/articles/211850

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Aharoni, Yair (1997). Changing Roles of State Intervention in Services in an Era of Open International Markets, New York: State University of New York Press.
  2. Bailey, David ve Driffield, Nigel (2002). “Hymer and Uneven Development Revisited: Foreign Direct Investment and Regional Inequalities”, Contributions to Political Economy, C.1, S.1, s.55-68.
  3. Bain, John (1956).
  4. Barriers to New Competition, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Univ. Press. 134 mülkiye 2011 Cilt: XXXV Sayı:271 Baran, P. ve Paul Sweezy (1966).
  5. Monopoly Capital, Harmondsworth: Penguin. Barnard, Helena ve Cantwell, John (2006). “Knowledge in the Theory of the Firm and MNC: Asset or Action ? A Commentary on Foss N. Knowledge and Organisation in the Theory of the MNC”, Journal of Management Governance, C.10, S.1, s.21-27.
  6. Buckley, Peter J. (2006). “Stephen Hymer: Three Phases, One Approach?” International Business Review C.15, S.2, s.140-147.
  7. Buckley, Peter ve Mark C. Casson (2009). “The internalisation theory of the multinational enterprise: A review of the progress of a research agenda after 30 years”. Journal of International Business Studies. C.1, S.1, s.55-68.
  8. Buckley, P. ve Mark Casson (1976). The future of the multinational enterprise, London: Macmillan. Buckley, Peter (2006). “Stephen Hymer: Three phases, one approach?”, International Business Review, C 15, S. 2, s. 140-147.
  9. Casson, Mark (1990).
  10. Multinational Corporations, Hants: Edward Elgar Publishing Chandler, Alfred D. (1962).
  11. Strategy and Structure, MIT Press., Cambridge, MA. Chandler, Alfred D. ve Redlich, Fritz (1961) “Recent Developments in American Business Administration and their conceptualization”. Business History Review, Spring, s.103-128.
  12. Coase, Ronald Harry. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica. Contractor, Farok J. (1993). “Choosing between Direct Investment and Licensing: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Tests”, John H. Dunning (der.), The Theory of Transnational Corporations, Londra: Routledge Cowling, K. ve Sudgen, Roger (1987).
  13. Transnational Monopoly Capitalism, Brighton: Wheatsheaf. Cowling, K. ve Sugden, Roger (1994).
  14. Beyond Capitalism, Towards a New World Economic Order. Londra: PinterDunning. DeGennaro, Ramon P. (2005). “Market imperfections,” Journal of Financial Transformation, C. 14, s. 107-117.
  15. Dunning, John H. (2006). “When I Met Hymer: Some Personal Recollections.” International Business Review, C.15, S.2, s.115-123.
  16. Dunning John H. (2001). “The Eclectic (OLI) Paradigm of International Production: Pas