Journals / Anestezi Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of plain and hyperbaric solutions of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia for major orthopedic surgery

Major ortopedik cerrahi için spinal anestezide izobarik ve hiperbarik ropivakain ve bupivakainin karşılaştırılması

Pages
74–80
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Glucose addition to ropivacaine during spinal anesthesia limits cephalic spread, increases reliability of anesthesia and also decreases sensorial and motor block duration.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study aimed to compare efficacy and safety of plain and hyperbaric solution of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For patients in Group HB 3 mL 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, in Group HR 2 mL 0.75% hyperbaric ropivacaine, in Group B 3. mL 0.5% plain bupivacaine and in Group R 3 mL 0.75% plain ropivacaine were used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Glucose addition to ropivacaine during spinal anesthesia limits cephalic spread, increases reliability of anesthesia and also decreases sensorial and motor block duration.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study aimed to compare efficacy and safety of plain and hyperbaric solution of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty. Methods: One hundered twenty patients, in ASA grade I-II. group undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia were included. For patients in Group HB 3 mL 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, in Group HR 2 mL 0.75% hyperbaric ropivacaine, in Group B 3. mL 0.5% plain bupivacaine and in Group R 3 mL 0.75% plain ropivacaine were used. The onset and duration of sensory block at dermatome level T10, maximum upper and lower spread of sensory block, the onset insensity and duration of motor block were recorded. Results: The mean duration of complete motor block was the least in Group HB (p<0.05). Onset of sensorial block at dermatome level T 10 was the earliest in Group HB (p<0.05). Onset of sensorial blockage at dermatome level T10 and L, was the highest in Group R and the lowest in Group B (p<0.05). Need for the first analgesia administration was the earliest in Group B and the latest in Group R (p<0.05). Hypotension after spinal block and intraoperative nausea and vomiting were significantly higher in Group HB (p<0.05). Intraoperative hypotension was the least in Group HR (p<0.05). General anesthesia administration due to inadequate intra-operative analgesia was more frequent in Group B (p<0.05). Conclusion: Glucose addition to ropivacaine during spinal anesthesia limits cephalic spread, increases reliability of anesthesia and also decreases sensorial and motor block duration.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışma total diz ve kalça artroplastisi uygulanan hastalarda izobarik bupivakain ve ropivakain kullanımı ile hiperbarik bupivakain ve ropivakain kullanımının etkinlik ile güvenilirliğini karşılaştırmak amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Gereç ve yöntem: Spinal anestezi altında diz veya kalça artroplasti cerrahisi planlanan ASA I-III grubuna dahil 120 hasta 4 gruba randomize edildi. Grup HB için 3 mL %0.5 hiperbarik bupivakain (n-30), Grup HR için 2 mL %0.75 hiperbarik ropivakain (n=30), Grup B için 3 mL %0.5 izobarik bupivakain (n=30) ve Grup R için 3 mL %0.75 izobarik ropivakain (n=30) kullanıldı. T10 seviyesinde duyusal bloğun başlangıç süresi ve bu seviyede duyusal bloğa ulaşma süresi, duyusal bloğun maksimum üst ve alt yayılım seviyeleri, motor blok yoğunluğu ve süresi kaydedildi. Bulgular: En kısa sürede tam motor blok Grup HB'de gelişmiştir (p<0.05). T10 seviyesinde duyusal blok başlangıcı en erken Grup HB'de gelişmiştir (p<0.05). T10 ve L1 dermatomlarında duyusal blok başlangıcı en fazla Grup R'de ve en az Grup B'de olmuştur (p<0.05). İlk analjezik uygulanım ihtiyacı en erken Grup B'de ve en geç Grup R'de ortaya çıkmıştır (p<0.05). Spinal blok sonrası hipotansiyon ile intraoperatif bulantı ve kusma Grup HB'de belirgin yüksek bulunmuştur (p<0.05). İntraoperatif hipotansiyonun en az Grup HR'de olduğu tespit edilmiştir (p<0.05). Yetersiz intraoperatif analjeziye bağlı genel anestezi uygulaması Grup B'de daha sıktır (p<0.05). Sonuç: Spinal anestezi uygulamalarında ropivakaine glukoz eklenmesi sefalik yayılımı engeller, anestezi güvenilirliğini artırır ve aynı zamanda duyusal ile motor blok sürelerini azaltır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BENGİSUN, Z. K., YILMAZ, A. A., ÖZGENCİL, E., DÖNER, T. E., ÖKTEN, F., DEMİRALP, S. (2010). Comparison of plain and hyperbaric solutions of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia for major orthopedic surgery. Anestezi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 74–80. https://ajindex.com/articles/199528

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Chung F, Seyone C, Dyek B and et al. Age related cognitive recovery after general anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1990
  2. Liu S, Carpenter RL, Mackey DC and et al. Effects of perioperative analgesic technique on rate of recovery after colon surgery. Anesthesiology 1995
  3. Derrington MC, Smith G. A review of studies of anesthetic risk, morbitity and mortality. Br J Anesth 1987
  4. Groban L, Deal DD, Vernon JC, James RL, Butterworth J. Cardiac resuscitation after incremental overdosage with lidocaine, bu-pivacaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in anesthetized dogs. Anesth Analg 2001
  5. Dony P, Dewinde V, Vanderick B and et al. The comparative toxicity of ropivacaine and bupivacaine at equipotent doses in rats. Anesth Analg 2000
  6. Gautier PE, De Kock M, Van Steenberge A, Miclot D, Fanard L, Hody JL. A double-blind comparison of 0.125% ropivacaine with sufentanil and 0.125% bupivacaine with sufentanil for epidural labor analgesia. Anesthesiology 1999
  7. Erichsen CJ, Sjövall J, Kehlet H, Hedlund C, Arvidsson T. Pharmacokinetics and analgesic effect of ropivacaine during continuous epidural infusion for postoperative pain relief. Anesthsiology 1996
  8. McClure JH. Ropivacaine. Br J Anaesth 1996
  9. Rosenberg PH, Heinonen E. Differential sensivity of A and C nerve fibers to long acting amide local anesthetics. Br J Anaesth 1983
  10. Wildsmith JA, Brown DT, Paul D, Johnson S. Structure-activity relationships in differential nerve block at high and low frequency stimulation. Br J Anaesth 1989
  11. Finucane TB, Sandler AN, Mc Kenna J and et al. A double-blind comparison of ropivacaine 0.5%, 0.75%, 1.0% and bupivacaine 0.5%, injected epidurally, in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Can J Anaesth 1996
  12. Zaric D, Axelsson K, Nydahl PA, Philipsson L, Larsson P, Jans-son JR. Sensory and motor blockade during epidural analgesia with 1%, 0.75%, and 0.5% ropivacaine. A double-blind study. AnesthAnalg 1991
  13. Brown DL. Spinal, epidural and caudal anestesia. In: Miller RD. Anesthesia, Philadelphia, Churchill Livingtone, 2000
  14. Bridenbaugh PO, Greene NM, Brull SJ, Cousins MJ, Veering BT, Willis RJ. Central Neural Blockade. In Neural Blockade In Clinical Anesthesia and Management of Pain, 3rd edition. Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PO. Lippincott-Raven, New York. 1998
  15. Malinovsky JM, Charles F, Kick O. Intrathecal a