Journals / Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation / 2021 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 5

Resolving Ethical Issues in the Field of Anaesthesia: A Mixed-Methods Study

Pages
407–413
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: There are complex ethical issues in the field of anaesthesiology that should be discussed with in the frame of deficiencies in training, ethical reasoning for patient autonomy, informed consent, paternalism and professional satisfaction to shed light on potential solutions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Ethical problems related to the field of anaesthesia and reanimation are generally addressed within the scope of reanimation and intensive care medicine by overseeing the particular issues of medical ethics in the practice of anaesthesia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Next, a questionnaire consisting of 20 multiple choice and open-ended questions and two Likert scales were developed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: There are complex ethical issues in the field of anaesthesiology that should be discussed with in the frame of deficiencies in training, ethical reasoning for patient autonomy, informed consent, paternalism and professional satisfaction to shed light on potential solutions.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Ethical problems related to the field of anaesthesia and reanimation are generally addressed within the scope of reanimation and intensive care medicine by overseeing the particular issues of medical ethics in the practice of anaesthesia. The existing literature shows that a very limited number of studies are found on this issue. This research aims to address this gap in the academic literature and to discuss ethical approaches to these problems. Methods: A search was conducted to compile key themes of ethical problems. These were combined with similar themes in the limited existing literature. Next, a questionnaire consisting of 20 multiple choice and open-ended questions and two Likert scales were developed. The answers to the questionnaire were collected on-line after 2 months. Results: The survey was conducted with 226 participants. 82.79% of the participants received ethics training only before graduation, and 95.40% stated that ethics training is required during their residency training. 67.80% of participants think that informed consent forms are sufficient in terms of content and readability, but 89.90% note that such forms are not read by patients. In the preoperative period, communication with patients, interaction with surgical teams, long working hours and high workload, problems in informing patients, lack of institutional support in malpractice cases, lack of authority, responsibility and rights of anaesthesiologists are the most important ethical and legal issues in the field. Conclusion: There are complex ethical issues in the field of anaesthesiology that should be discussed with in the frame of deficiencies in training, ethical reasoning for patient autonomy, informed consent, paternalism and professional satisfaction to shed light on potential solutions.

🔖

Cite This Article

EMEKÇİ, P. E., BENGİSUN, Z. K., ARDA, B. (2021). Resolving Ethical Issues in the Field of Anaesthesia: A Mixed-Methods Study. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 5, 407–413. https://ajindex.com/articles/370059

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Ekmekci PE. Medical ethics education in Turkey; state of play and challenges. IOJET. 2016;3(1):54-63
  2. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York, USA: Oxford University Press, 2001:57-103
  3. White SM. Consent for anaesthesia. J Med Ethics. 2004;30:286- 290. [CrossRef] 4. Buchanan AE. Medical paternalism. Philos Public Aff. 1978;7:370-390
  4. Savulescu J. Rational non-interventional paternalism: Why doctors ought to make judgments of what is best for their patients. J Med Ethics. 1995;21:327-331. [CrossRef] 6. Murgic L, He´bert PC, Sovic S, Pavlekovic G. Paternalism and autonomy: Views of patients and providers in a transitional (post-communist) country. BMC Med Ethics. 2015;16(1):65. [CrossRef] 7. Bassford HA. The justification of medical paternalism. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(6):731-739. [CrossRef] 8. Romani M, Ashkar K. Burnout among physicians. Libyan J Med. 2014;9:23556. [CrossRef] 9. Wu D, Wang Y, Lam KF, et al. Health system reforms, violence against doctors and job satisfaction in the medical profession: A cross-sectional survey in Zhejiang province, Eastern China. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e006431. [CrossRef] 10. Bria M, Baban A, Dumitras cu DL. Systematic review of burnout risk factors among European healthcare professionals. Cogn Brain Behav. 2012;10(3):423-452
  5. Han S, Shanafelt TD, Sinsky CA, et al. Estimating the attributable cost of physician burnout in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170:784-790. [CrossRef] 12. Vasconcelos Filho P, de Souza MR, Elias PE, D’A´ vila Viana AL. Physicians’ job satisfaction and motivation in a public academic hospital. Hum Resour Health. 2016;14(1):75. [CrossRef] 13. De Rijk AE, Blanc PML, Schaufeli WB, De Jonge J. Active coping and need for control as moderators of the job demand–control model: Effects on burnout. J Occup Organ Psychol. 1998;71:1-18. [CrossRef]