Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2019 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

EARLY RESULTS OF ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMY AND FUSION WITH INTERBODY CAGES

Pages
117–120
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our study has favorable fusion results with acceptable complication rates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with interbody cages has been widely used for cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) along with the other procedures (simple discectomy, cervical disc arthroplasty, ACDF with plating etc.) The aim of the study is to analyze the clinical outcomes measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and Odom’s criteria after ACDF with blade polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage plus bioactive bone graft substitute.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: 83 patients operated by a single neurosurgeon on for singel-level or multi-level ACDF with bladed PEEK cage was evaluated retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our study has favorable fusion results with acceptable complication rates.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with interbody cages has been widely used for cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) along with the other procedures (simple discectomy, cervical disc arthroplasty, ACDF with plating etc.) The aim of the study is to analyze the clinical outcomes measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and Odom’s criteria after ACDF with blade polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage plus bioactive bone graft substitute. Materials and Methods: 83 patients operated by a single neurosurgeon on for singel-level or multi-level ACDF with bladed PEEK cage was evaluated retrospectively. Clinical outcome scores measured by VAS scores and Odom’s criteria; postoperative fusion rates were analyzed on postoperative cervical radiographs. Early postoperative complications, implant failures and progression to adjacent segment disease were investigated. Results: In our study, one-level ACDF was performed on 51 patients, two-level ACDF was performed on 29 patients and three level ACDF was performed on 3 patients. 91.6 % (76 patients) of the patients presented with radiculopathy, whereas, 8.4 % (7 patients) of the patients presented with radiculomyelopathy. Mean follow-up is 18 months (range 1-32 months). VAS scores were improved in 97.6 % of the patients. According to Odom’s criteria, 95 % of the patients evaluated the surgery success as excellent; 5% of the patients evaluated the surgery success as good. All of the patients with radiculopathic symptoms fully recovered, whereas, 4 patients (57.2 %) with radiculomyelopathy had improved, whereas in 3 patients (42.8 %) neurological status did not changed postoperatively. Symptomatic adjacent segment disease was not encountered in any of the cases. As for early postoperative complications, one patient had a cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF) fistula which required second operation along with a lumbar drainage, 30 % of the patients had transient difficulty of swallowing which resolved in 2-3 days, in 92 % of patients fusion was achived. No mortality was noted. Conclusions: ACDF procedure is an effective treatment for cervical DDD. ACDF with bladed cages have higher fusion rates and less implant subsidence. Our study has favorable fusion results with acceptable complication rates.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKER, B. (2019). EARLY RESULTS OF ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMY AND FUSION WITH INTERBODY CAGES. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 117–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/194242

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Aydın Y, Kaya RA, Can SM, Türkmenoğlu O, Çavuşoğlu H, Ziyal IM. Minimally invasive anterior contralateral approach for the treatment of cervical disc herniation. Surg Neuro 2005; 63(3): 210-219
  2. Bertalanffy H, Eggert HR. Complications of anterior cervical discectomy without fusion in 450 consecutive patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1989; 99(1-2): 41-50
  3. Cloward RB. The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disc. J Neurosurg 1958; 16: 602-607
  4. Dagli M, Er U, Şimşek S, Bavbek M. Late results of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with interbody cages. Asian Spine J 2013; 7(1): 34–38
  5. Donaldson JW, Nelson PB. Anterior cervical discectomy without interbody fusion. Surg Neurol 2003; 57 (4): 219-224
  6. Fraser JF, Härtl R. Anterior approaches to fusion of the cervical spine: A meta-analysis of fusion rates. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 6: 298–303
  7. Grasso G, Landi A. Long-term clinical and radiological outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion by zero-profile anchored cage. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 2018; 9(2): 87–92
  8. Guinto F. CT demonstration of disk regression after conservative therapy. Am J Neuroradiol 1984; 5(5): 632-633
  9. Hirsch C. Cervical disc rupture: diagnosis and therapy. Acta Orthop Scan 1964; 30: 172-186
  10. Kapetanakis S, Thomaidis T, Charitoudis G, Pavlidis P, Theodosiadis P, Gkasdaris G. Single anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self- locking standalone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage: evaluation of pain and health-related quality of life. J Spine Surg 2017; 3: 312-322
  11. Komori H, Okawa A, Haro H, Muneta T, Tamamoto H, Shinomiya K. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in conservative management of lumbar disc herniation. Spine 1998; 23(1): 67-73
  12. Savolainen S, Rinne J, Hernesniemi J. A prospective randomized study of anterior single-level cervical disc operations with long-term follow-up: surgical fusion is unnecessary. Neurosurgery 1998; 43(1): 51-55
  13. Smith GW, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1958; 40-A: 624-662
  14. Song KJ, Taghavi CE, Lee KB, Song JH, Eun JP. The efficacy of plate construct augmentation versus cage alone in anterior cervical fusion. Spine 2009; 34: 2886-2892
  15. Song KJ, Choi BW, Jeon TS, Lee KB, Chang H. Adjacent segment degenerative disease: Is it due to disease progression or a fusion-associated phenomenon. Comparison