Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

Clinical and radiologic results of posterior decompression and fusion surgery in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis

Dejeneratif lomber spinal stenozda posterior dekompresyon ve füzyon uygulamasının klinik ve radyolojik sonuçları

Pages
117–122
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Postoperative clinic scale and Oswestry questionnaire found to be beter significantly (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of radiological and clinical data of patients treated by posterior decompression and fusion who have degenerative lomber spinal stenosis (DLSS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Method: 30 patients (17 female, 13 male) evaluated in this study who diagnosed as DLSS and underwent to surgery between 1999 and 2005.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Postoperative clinic scale and Oswestry questionnaire found to be beter significantly (p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of radiological and clinical data of patients treated by posterior decompression and fusion who have degenerative lomber spinal stenosis (DLSS). Materials and Method: 30 patients (17 female, 13 male) evaluated in this study who diagnosed as DLSS and underwent to surgery between 1999 and 2005. Lumbar spinal canal measured with CT scans of the operated level, one level upper and one level under from the operated level. All patients evaluated with Oswestry questionnaire and clinic examination scale (existence of back pain, leg pain, numbness, prickle, motor deficiency and sensory deficiency). Preoperative and postoperative satisfaction was evaluated by Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Results: Mean follow-up time was 4.3±3.7 years. Preoperative spinal canal diameter was 12.4±3.3 mm whereas postoperative 14.0±2.8 mm. Postoperative clinic scale and Oswestry questionnaire found to be beter significantly (p

Özet

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of radiological and clinical data of patients treated by posterior decompression and fusion who have degenerative lomber spinal stenosis (DLSS). Materials and Method: 30 patients (17 female, 13 male) evaluated in this study who diagnosed as DLSS and underwent to surgery between 1999 and 2005. Lumbar spinal canal measured with CT scans of the operated level, one level upper and one level under from the operated level. All patients evaluated with Oswestry questionnaire and clinic examination scale (existence of back pain, leg pain, numbness, prickle, motor deficiency and sensory deficiency). Preoperative and postoperative satisfaction was evaluated by Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Results: Mean follow-up time was 4.3±3.7 years. Preoperative spinal canal diameter was 12.4±3.3 mm whereas postoperative 14.0±2.8 mm. Postoperative clinic scale and Oswestry questionnaire found to be beter significantly (p

🔖

Cite This Article

DUYMUŞ, T. M., ARGIN, M., SESLİ, E., ATAMAZ, F., KÖMÜR, B., MUTLU, S., KAAN, E., YILMAZ, B. (2022). Clinical and radiologic results of posterior decompression and fusion surgery in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 117–122. https://ajindex.com/articles/568579

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Arnoldi CC, Brodsky AE, Cauchoix J, Crock HV, Dommisse GF, Edgar M, Jacobson RE, Kirkaldy – Willis WH, Kurihara A Kurihara, Macnab I, McIvor GW, New- man PH, Paine KW, Russin LA, Sheldon J, Tile M, Urist MR, Wilson WE, Wiltse LL. Lumbar spinal stenosis and nevre root entrapment syndromes. Definition and clas- sification. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976; 115: 4-5
  2. Atlas SJ, Keller BR,Wu YA, Deyo AR, Singer ED. Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical manage- ment of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine 2005; 30(8): 936-943
  3. Aykaç B, Çopuroğlu C. Özcan M, Çiftdemir M, Yalnız E. Enstrümantasyonlu posterior dekompresyon uygulanan lomber dar kanal olgularında ameliyat sonrası yaşam kalitesinin değerlendirilmesi. Acta Orthop Trauma- tol Turc 2011; 45(1): 47-52
  4. Chang Y, Singer ED, Wu YA, Keller BR, Atlas SJ. The effect of surgical and nonsurgical treatment on longi- tudinal outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis over 10 years. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53(5): 785-792
  5. Cornefjord M, Byröd G, Brisby H, Rydevik H. A long-term (4- to 12-year) follow-upstudy of surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 2000; 9:5 63–570
  6. Fu SY, Zeng BF, Xu JG. Long-term outcomes of two different decompressive techniques for lumbar spinal ste- nosis. Spine 2008; 33(5): 514-518
  7. Gelalis ID, Stafilas KS, Korompilias AV. Zacharis CK, Beris E, Xenakis AT. Decompressive surgery for de- generative lumbar spinal stenosis: long-term results. In- tern Orthop (SICOT) (2006); 30: 59–63
  8. Gelalis ID, Arnaoutoglou C, Chrıstoforou G, Lykıssas GM, Batsılas I, Xenakıs T. Dejeneratif lomber kanal darlığı nedeniyle dekompresif laminektomi ve posterior enstrümantasyon uygulanan hastalarda cerrahi sonuçların ileriye dönük analizi. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2010; 44(3): 235-240
  9. Hashimoto T, Kaneda K, Abumi K. Relationship between rheumatic spinal canal stenosis and neurologic deficits in thoracolumbar burst fractures. Spine 1988; 13(11): 1268-1272
  10. Herno A, Partanen K, Talaslahti T, Kaukanen E., Turunen V, Suomalainen O. Long-Term clinical and magnetic resonance imaging follow-upassessment of patient swith lumbar spinal stenosis after laminectomy. Spine 1999; 24(15): 1533–1537
  11. Karaeminoğulları O, Aydınlı U. TOTBİD Journal 2004; (3): 3-4
  12. Panagiotis ZE, Athanasios K, Panagiotis D, Minos T, Elias CL. Functional outcome of surgical treatment for multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta Orthopaedica 2006; 77(4):