Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2019 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

EVALUATION OF THE DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS AFFECTING RECURRENCE OF LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

Pages
121–126
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Select the correct patient may lead to reduce the risk of RLDH.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Reherniation is the experience of another lumbar disc herniation (LDH) at the same level and same side after a pain-free period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: 816 patients were underwent discectomy surgery at Neurosurgery department of BRSHH between the years 2014 and 2015, the patients who followed up at least 36-month and appropriate to our study criteria were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Select the correct patient may lead to reduce the risk of RLDH.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aim: Reherniation is the experience of another lumbar disc herniation (LDH) at the same level and same side after a pain-free period. In this study, socioeconomic factors affecting reherniation after discectomy prospectively have been investigated. Material and Methods: 816 patients were underwent discectomy surgery at Neurosurgery department of BRSHH between the years 2014 and 2015, the patients who followed up at least 36-month and appropriate to our study criteria were included. The patients’ demographic characteristics such as age, gender, job, BMI, clinical presentations were recorded. The patients were divided into who had recurrent LDH (RLDH) and others (control group) and the comparison had been performed between both groups using all above parameters prospectively. Results: 816 (430 women, 386 men) patients were underwent discectomy for LDH. 842 disc levels were operated. The mean age was 46.9 (17-82). The mean follow-up period was 47.8 (36-61) months. The mean of preoperative leg and back VAS score were 8.9 and 3.1, respectively. The mean of 12th and 24th month postoperative leg and back VAS score were 1.9, 1.64, 1.9, and 1.82, respectively. The mean of preoperative ODI, 12th and 24th month postoperative ODI were 73.3, 15, and 18.2, respectively. Gender, age, symptom’s duration, surgery condition and period, trauma, comorbidities, smoking, and early returning to duties are not related to recurrence of LDH in our patients. Conclusion: Motor deficits on presentation may reduce RLDH risk. Intact neurologic examination may increase the RLDH risk. Select the correct patient may lead to reduce the risk of RLDH.

🔖

Cite This Article

ABDALLAH, A., SEYİTHANOĞLU, M. (2019). EVALUATION OF THE DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS AFFECTING RECURRENCE OF LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 121–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/190779

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Byung-Joon S. Risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniations. Asian Spine J 2014; 8(2): 211-215
  2. Carragee EJ, Han MY, Suen PW, Kim D. Clinical outcomes after lumbar discectomy for sciatica: the effects of fragment type and annular competence. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003
  3. A: 102-108
  4. Carragee EJ, Spinnickie AO, Alamin TF, Paragioudakis S. A prospective controlled study of limited versus subtotal posterior discectomy: short-term outcomes in patients with herniated lumbar intervertebral discs and large posterior annular defect. Spine 2006; 31(25): 653-657
  5. Emel E, Abdallah A, Özer AF. Taking history and patient assessment in spinal surgery. In: Özer AF, Arslantaş A, Dalbayrak S (Eds.). Principles of Spine Surgery. Volume-1, İntertıp Yayınevi, İzmir 2017; pp: 99-108
  6. Fakouri B, Shetty NR, White TC. Is sequestrectomy a viable alternative to microdiscectomy? A systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473: 1957-1962
  7. Frymoyer JW, Pope MH, Clements JH, Wilder DG, MacPherson B, Ashikaga T. Risk factors in low-back pain. An epidemiological survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983; 65-A: 213-218
  8. Huang W, Han Z, Liu J, Yu L, Yu X. Risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95(2): 1-10
  9. Kim CH, Chung CK, Park CS, Choi B, Kim MJ, Park BJ. Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar herniated intervertebral disc disease: nationwide cohort study. Spine 2013; 38: 581-590
  10. McGirt MJ, Ambrossi GLG, Datoo G, Sciubba DM, Witham TF, Wolinsky J-P, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon A. Recurrent disc herniation and long-term back pain after primary lumbar discectomy. Review of outcomes reported for limited versus aggressive disc removal. Neurosurgery 2009; 64(2): 338-344
  11. Mundt DJ, Kelsey JL, Golden AL, et al. An epidemiologic study of non-occupational lifting as a risk factor for herniated lumbar intervertebral disc. The Northeast Collaborative Group on Low Back Pain. Spine 1993; 18: 595-602
  12. Neaton JD, Wentworth D: Serum cholesterol, blood pressure, cigarette smoking, and death from coronary heart disease. Overall findings and differences by age for 316,099 white men. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group. Arch Intern Med.1992; 152: 56-64
  13. Robinson D, Mirovsky Y, Halperin N, et al: Changes in proteoglycans of intervertebral disc in diabetic patients: a possible cause of increased back pain. Spine. 1998; 23: 849- 855
  14. Schmidt H, Kettler A, Heuer F, Simon U. Intradiscal pressure,