Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2019 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF ADDING DYNAMIC SCREWS TO UPPER FUSION SEGMENT IN PATIENTS WITH DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SPINE

Pages
127–131
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although long-term followed-up, studies are needed to assess the sufficiency of dynamic screw addition to instrumented fusion segment to prevent the adjacent segment disease.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To assess sufficiency of dynamic screw addition to instrumented fusion segment to prevent development of the adjacent segment disease (ASD).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for degenerative lumbar spine surgery from 2016 to 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although long-term followed-up, studies are needed to assess the sufficiency of dynamic screw addition to instrumented fusion segment to prevent the adjacent segment disease.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aim: To assess sufficiency of dynamic screw addition to instrumented fusion segment to prevent development of the adjacent segment disease (ASD). Material and Methods: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for degenerative lumbar spine surgery from 2016 to 2018. Patients with degenerative lumbar spinal disease constituted the core sample for this study. To obtain homogeneity of both groups only patients involved with degenerative lumbar spine disease were included. All surgeries were performed by the same spine surgeon (EO). Results: This series included 87 (66 female, 21 male) patients, with a median age of 56 years. Mean follow-up period was 10.24 months for dynamic screw added patients and 16.06 months for only fusion patients. Eleven patients with adjacent level disease were diagnosed only in alone fusion group (17.7 %) and no adjacent level disease was diagnosed in upper level dynamic screw added group. Adjacent level disease is statistically significant in alone fusion group (p = 0.03). Conclusions: In our study, there is a statistically significant difference between only fusion instrumentation and dynamic screw added fusion in radiologic and clinical adjacent segment disease. Although long-term followed-up, studies are needed to assess the sufficiency of dynamic screw addition to instrumented fusion segment to prevent the adjacent segment disease.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZEK, E., ABDALLAH, A. (2019). PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF ADDING DYNAMIC SCREWS TO UPPER FUSION SEGMENT IN PATIENTS WITH DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SPINE. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 127–131. https://ajindex.com/articles/194243

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Formica M, Cavagnaro L, Basso M, Zanirato A, Felli L, Formica C. Is it possible to preserve lumbar lordosis after hybrid stabilization? Preliminary results of a novel rigiddynamic stabilization system in degenerative lumbar pathologies. Eur Spine J. 2015; 24: 849-854
  2. Hayati A, Osman Y, Muren M. Does the Addition of a Dynamic Pedicle Screw to a Fusion Segment Prevent Adjacent Segment Pathology in the Lumbar Spine? Asian Spine J. 2017; 11(5): 715-721
  3. Kaito T, Hosono N, Mukai Y, Makino T, Fuji T, Yonenobu K. Induction of early degeneration of the adjacent segment after posterior lumbar interbody fusion by excessive distraction of lumbar disc space. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010; 12: 671-679
  4. Kim CH, Chung CK, Jahng TA. Comparisons of outcomes after single or multilevel dynamic stabilization: effects on adjacent segment. J Spinal Disord Tech 2011; 24: 60-67
  5. Kumar A, Beastall J, Hughes J, et al. Disc changes in the bridged and adjacent segments after Dynesys dynamic stabilization system after two years. Spine 2008; 33: 2909- 2914
  6. Lee SE, Jahng TA, Kim HJ. Hybrid surgery combined with dynamic stabilization system and fusion for the multilevel degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine. Int J Spine Surg. 2015; 9: 45
  7. Lund T, Oxland TR. Adjacent level disk disease: is it really a fusion disease? Orthop Clin North Am 2011; 42: 529-541
  8. Maserati MB, Tormenti MJ, Panczykowski DM, Bon- field CM, Gerszten PC. The use of a hybrid dynamic stabilization and fusion system in the lumbar spine: preliminary experience. Neurosurg Focus 2010; 28: E2
  9. Norvell DC, Dettori JR, Skelly AC, Riew KD, Chap- man JR, Anderson PA. Methodology for the systematic reviews on an adjacent segment pathology. Spine 2012; 37(22 Suppl): S10-S17
  10. Ou CY, Lee TC, Lee TH, Huang YH. Impact of body mass index on adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion for degenerative spine disease. Neurosurgery. 2015; 76: 396-401
  11. Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, Hoff JT, McGillicuddy JE. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: Review of the literature. Spine 2004; 29: 1938-1944
  12. Radcliff KE, Kepler CK, Jakoi A, Sidhu GS, Rihn J, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ, Hilibrand AS. Adjacent segment disease in the lumbar spine following different treatment interventions. Spine J. 2013; 13: 1339-1349
  13. Radcliff KE, Kepler CK, Maaieh M, Anderson DG, Rihn J, Albert T, Vaccaro A, Hilibrand A. What is the rate of lumbar adjacent segment disease after percutaneous versus open fu