Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 3

Radiation-Induced Meningiomas: A Series of Four Consecutive Patients and a Review of Literature

Pages
323–349
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To reduce fatal complications, surgery should be planned inconjunction with plastic surgeons.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIM: To assess the clinical outcomes of treatment for radiation-induced meningiomas.MATERIAL and METHODS: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for all cranial meningioma cases that were diagnosedand/or underwent surgery at our hospital from 2009 to 2016.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All radiation-associated meningioma patients constituted the coresample for this study.RESULTS: This series included one female and three male patients, with a mean age of 47.3 ± 16.3 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To reduce fatal complications, surgery should be planned inconjunction with plastic surgeons.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

AIM: To assess the clinical outcomes of treatment for radiation-induced meningiomas.MATERIAL and METHODS: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for all cranial meningioma cases that were diagnosedand/or underwent surgery at our hospital from 2009 to 2016. All radiation-associated meningioma patients constituted the coresample for this study.RESULTS: This series included one female and three male patients, with a mean age of 47.3 ± 16.3 years. The mean preoperativecourse was <3 months. The most common symptom was headache (100%) and three patients had alopecia and thin scalp skin. Themean of the age at which they underwent radiotherapy was 18.5 ± 13.7 years. The mean latency period was 19.2 ± 7.4 years. Initialmalignancies included two patients with desmoplastic medulloblastomas (13-year-old female, 65 Gy), (11-year-old male, 54 Gy)and a patient with grade II oligodendroglioma treated with 30 Gy. A male patient received low-dose radiotherapy for chronic otitisat 10 years old. Histopathological examinations revealed the following: 1) fibroblastic-grade I, Ki-67 2%–3%, 25.5 years latency;cerebellopontine angle, 2) atypical meningioma grade II, Ki-67 8%, 21 years, frontal; and 3) transitional grade I, Ki-67 3%–4%, 11years, frontal. The fourth patient had three radiation-induced meningiomas and 27 radiation-induced cavernomas, and was treatedusing a gamma knife. The mean follow-up period was 34.8±39.4 months. One patient had rhinorrhea and another experienced acerebrospinal fluid fistula. Both underwent an additional operation. The former died because of meningitis on postoperative day 31.CONCLUSION: Most radiation-induced meningiomas are low-grade, but they have a high trend of recurrence. Close follow-up andyearly magnetic resonance imaging would minimize the morbidity rate. To reduce fatal complications, surgery should be planned inconjunction with plastic surgeons.

🔖

Cite This Article

ABDALLAH, A., GUNDUZ, H. B., ASILTURK, M., SOFUOGLU, O. E., BİLGİÇ, B., EMEL, E., ABDALLAH, B. G. (2020). Radiation-Induced Meningiomas: A Series of Four Consecutive Patients and a Review of Literature. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 3, 323–349. https://ajindex.com/articles/402968

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Aboukais R, Zairi F, Le Rhun E, Lejeune JP, Devos P, Reyns N: Radiation-associated grade 2 meningiomas: A nine patientseries and review of the literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 136: 10-14, 2015 2. Al-Mefty O, Topsakal C, Pravdenkova S, Sawyer JR, Harrison MJ: Radiation-induced meningiomas: Clinical, pathological, cytokinetic, and cytogenetic characteristics. J Neurosurg 100: 1002-1013, 2004 3. Andrade EMF, Alves RV, Fiore ME, De Araújo AB, Carlos A, Godoy R: Radiation-induced meningiomas: The importance of continued follow up after cranial irradiation. J Bras Neurochirurg 21: 245-248, 2010 4. Azab WA, Al-awadi YA, Abdel-Razek MSZ: Radiation-induced meningiomas. Pan Arab Journal of Neurosurgery 15:67-71, 2011 5. Baheti AD, Mahore AS, Zade BP, Jalali R: Meningioma and cavernous angioma following childhood radiotherapy. J Cancer Res Ther 6:333-335, 2010 6. Balik V, Sarissky M, Lohmann D, Sulla I: Meningioma 40 years after radiation therapy for Retinoblastoma: Genetic and phenotypic analysis, and minireview of literature. Zentralbl Neurochir 69: 1-6, 2008 7. Banerjee J, Paakko E, Harila M, Herva R, Tuominen J, Koivula A, Lanning M, Harila-Saari A: Radiation-induced meningiomas: A shadow in the success story of childhood leukemia. Neuro Oncol 11: 543-549, 2009 8. Brassesco MS, Valera ET, Neder L, Pezuk JA, Oliveira RS, Scrideli CA, Tone LG: Cytogenetic findings in pediatric radiation-induced atypical meningioma after treatment of medulloblastoma: Case report and review of the literature. J Neurooncol 110: 397-402, 2012 9. Caroli E, Russillo M, Ferrante L: Intracranial meningiomas in children: Report of 27 new cases and critical analysis of 440 cases reported in the literature. J Child Neurol 21: 31-36, 2006 10. Cernea D, Pruteanu DP, Bogdan V: Malignant meningioma after radiotherapy for tinea capitis in childhood. Journal of Radiotherapy & Medical Oncology 27(2): 69-72, 2012 11. Char DH, Shiel MJ: Orbital meningioma after cranial radiation for acute lymphocytic leukemia. Orbit 27: 321-323, 2008 12. Chojnacka M, Pedziwiatr K, Skowronska-Gardas A, PerekPolnik M, Perek D, Olasek P: Second brain tumors following central nervous system radiotherapy in childhood. Br J Radiol 87: 20140211, 2014 13. Chourmouzi D, Papadopoulou E, Kontopoulos A, Drevelegas A: Radiation-induced intracranial meningioma and multiple cavernomas. BMJ Case Rep: 2013, 2013 14. Chowdhary A, Spence AM, Sales L, Rostomily RC, Rockhill JK, Silbergeld DL: Radiation associated tumors following the