SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Güncel Retina Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3

Recurrent Macular Hole: Causes, Risk Factors and Treatment

Nüks Maküla Deliği: Nedenleri, Risk Faktörleri ve Tedavisi

Eyüp ÖZCAN
Peykan TÜRKÇÜOĞLU
Nilüfer YEŞİLIRMAK
Pages
293–295
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this article, we reviewed the causes, risk factors and current treatments of recurrent macular holes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Idiopathic macular hole is a full thickness defect of retina which is caused by the tangential vitreomacular traction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Its prevalence is 8.7 per 100,000 people.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this article, we reviewed the causes, risk factors and current treatments of recurrent macular holes.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Idiopathic macular hole is a full thickness defect of retina which is caused by the tangential vitreomacular traction. Its prevalence is 8.7 per 100,000 people. Pars plana vitrectomy, internal limiting membrane peeling, gas tamponade and facedown head positioning have a high success rate for primary hole closure. Improvements in small incision vitrectomy techniques reduce cystoid macular edema, epiretinal membrane formation and also reopening of macular hole. Bilaterality, high myopia, intraoperative retinal breaks are well known risk factors for recurrence. In this article, we reviewed the causes, risk factors and current treatments of recurrent macular holes.

Özet

İdiopatik maküla deliği tanjansiyel vitreomaküler traksiyon sonucu gelişen tam kat retina doku defektidir. Toplumda 100,000’de 8,7 oranında görülmektedir. Maküla deliği tedavisinde pars plana vitrektomi, internal limitan membran soyulması, gaz tamponadı ve yüz üstü baş pozisyonu ile yüksek başarı yakalanmıştır. Küçük kesili vitrektomi tekniklerinin geliştirilmesi, kistoid maküla ödemi ve epiretinal membran gelişiminin azalması ile birlikte nüks maküla deliği gelişim oranı da azaltmıştır. Bilateralite, yüksek miyopi, intraoperatif yırtık gelişimi nüks maküla deliği gelişimi için bilinen risk faktörleridir. Bu yazıda nüks maküla deliği gelişimine yol açan nedenler, risk faktörleri ve güncel tedavi yöntemleri tartışılmıştır..

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZCAN, E., TÜRKÇÜOĞLU, P., YEŞİLIRMAK, N. (2018). Recurrent Macular Hole: Causes, Risk Factors and Treatment. Güncel Retina Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3, 293–295. https://ajindex.com/articles/190649

References (10)

  1. Mc Cannel CA, Ensminger JL, Diehl NN, Hodge DN. Population based incidence of macular holes. Ophthalmology 2009;116(7): 1366–1369. Gass JDM. Idiopathic senile macular hole: its early stages and pathogenesis. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106(5):629–639.
  2. Kelly N, Wendel R. Vitreous surgery for idiopathic macular holes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109(5):654-659.
  3. Yooh HS, Brooks HL Jr, Capone A Jr, L’Hernault NL, Grossniklaus HE. Ultrastructural features of tissue removed during idiopathic macular hole surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 1996;122(1):67–75.
  4. Ben Simon GJ, Desatnik H, Alhalel A, Treister G, Moisseiev J. Retrospective analysis of vitrectomy with and without internal limiting membrane peeling for stage 3 and 4 macular hole. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2004;35(2):109–115.
  5. Kwok AK, Lai TY, Yuen KS, Tam BS, Wong VW. Macular hole surgery with or without indocyanine green stained internal limiting membrane peeling. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2003;31(6):470– 475. Sheidow TG, Blinder KJ, Holekamp N, Joseph D, Shah G, Grand MG et al. Outcome results in macular hole surgery: an evaluation of internal limiting membrane peeling with and without indocyanine green. Ophthalmology 2003;110(9):1697–1701.
  6. Uemoto R, Yamamoto S, Aoki T, Tsukahara I, Yamamoto T, Takeuchi S. Macular configuration determined by optical coherence tomography after idiopathic macular hole surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86(11):1240– 1242. Yamanishi S, Emi K, Motokura M, Oshima Y, Nakayama M, Watanabe M. Visual outcome of macular hole surgery with internal limiting membrane peeling. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 2001;105(11):788–793. Brooks HL Jr. Macular hole surgery with and without internal limiting membrane peeling. Ophthalmology 2000;107(10):1939– 1949.
  7. Kumagai K, Furukawa M, Ogino N, Uemura A, Demizu S, Larson E. Vitreous surgery with and without internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole repair. Retina 2004;24(5):721–727.
  8. Yoshida M, Kishi S. Pathogenesis of macular hole recurrence and its prevention by internal limiting membrane peeling. Retina 2007;27(2):169-173.
  9. Paques M, Massin P, Blain P, Duquesnoy AS, Gaudric A. Long-term incidence of reopening of macular holes. Ophthalmology 2000;107(4):760–765.
  10. Duker JS, Wendel R, Patel AC, Puliafito CA. Late re-opening of macular holes after initially successful treatment with vitreous surgery. Ophthalmology 1994;101(8):1373– 1378. Christmas NJ, Smiddy WE, Flynn HW. Reopening of macular holes after initially success