SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 7

LONG-RUN RELATIONS BETWEEN MONEY, PRICES AND OUTPUT: THE CASE OF TURKEY

PARA, FİYATLAR VE ÇIKTI ARASINDAKİ UZUN-DÖNEMLİ İLİŞKİLER: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Cem SAATCIOGLU
Levent KORAP
Pages
33–54
Publication Date
2008-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We have concluded that given the endogenous characteristics of the monetary variables, monetary authority follows an accommodative monetary policy inside the period

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, the long-run relationships between monetary aggregates, prices and real output level have been examined in a quantity theory of money perspective for the Turkish economy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Using some contemporaneous econometric techniques, our findings exhibit that stationary characteristics of the velocities of narrowly and broadly defined monetary aggregates cannot be rejected.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We have concluded that given the endogenous characteristics of the monetary variables, monetary authority follows an accommodative monetary policy inside the period
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Paranın Miktar Kuramı · Eş-Bütünleşim · Türkiye Ekonomisi

Abstract

In this paper, the long-run relationships between monetary aggregates, prices and real output level have been examined in a quantity theory of money perspective for the Turkish economy. Using some contemporaneous econometric techniques, our findings exhibit that stationary characteristics of the velocities of narrowly and broadly defined monetary aggregates cannot be rejected. However, monetary aggregates seem to have an endogeneity for the long-run evolution of prices and real income. Furthermore, some parameter instabilities and structural breaks have been attributed to the estimated model especially for the 1994 and 2001 economic crisis periods in the Turkish economy. We have concluded that given the endogenous characteristics of the monetary variables, monetary authority follows an accommodative monetary policy inside the period

Özet

In this paper, the long-run relationships between monetary aggregates, prices and real output level have been examined in a quantity theory of money perspective for the Turkish economy. Using some contemporaneous econometric techniques, our findings exhibit that stationary characteristics of the velocities of narrowly and broadly defined monetary aggregates cannot be rejected. However, monetary aggregates seem to have an endogeneity for the long-run evolution of prices and real income. Furthermore, some parameter instabilities and structural breaks have been attributed to the estimated model especially for the 1994 and 2001 economic crisis periods in the Turkish economy. We have concluded that given the endogenous characteristics of the monetary variables, monetary authority follows an accommodative monetary policy inside the period.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAATCIOGLU, C., KORAP, L. (2008). LONG-RUN RELATIONS BETWEEN MONEY, PRICES AND OUTPUT: THE CASE OF TURKEY. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 7, 33–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/170605

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Ardıc, K. (1997), “Lucas Eleştirisi (Lucas Critique)”, Para & Finans Ansiklopedisi, (Ed., D. Gökçe), Creative Yayıncılık ve Tanıtım, pp. 1063-1067.
  2. Ashra, S., S. Chattopadhyay, and K. Chaudhuri (2004), “Deficit, Money and Price:The Indian Experience”, Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 26, pp. 289-299.
  3. Banerjee, A., R.L. Lumsdaine and J.H. Stock (1992), “Recursive and Sequential Tests of the Unit Root and Trend Break Hypothesis”, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol. 10, pp. 271-287. Bårdsen, G. (1992), “Dynamic Modeling of the Demand for Narrow Money in Norway”, Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 363-393.
  4. Bullard, J. (1999), “Testing Long-Run Monetary Neutrality Propositions: Lessons from the Recent Research”, FRB of St. Louis Review, November/December, pp. 57-77.
  5. Cheong, C. (2003), “Regime Changes and Econometric Modeling of the Demand for Moneyin Korea”, Economic Modelling, Vol. 20, pp. 437-453.
  6. Clemente, J., A. Montanes and M. Reyes (1998), “Testing for a Unit Root in Variables with a Double Change in the Mean”, Economics Letters, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 175-182.
  7. Dickey, D.A. and W.A.Fuller (1979), “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 74, pp. 427-431.
  8. Dotsey, M. and A. Hornstein (2003), “Should a Monetary Policymaker Look at Money?”, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 50, pp. 547-579.
  9. Dwyer, G.P. and R.W. Hafer (1999), “Are Money Growth and Inflation Still Related?”, FRB of Atlanta Economic Review, Second Quarter, pp. 32-43.
  10. Dwyer, G.P. and R.W. Hafer (1988), “Is Money Irrelevant?”, FRB of St. Louis Review, Vol. 80, pp. 13-24.
  11. Engle, R.F., D.F. Hendry and J.-F. Richard (1983), “Exogeneity”, Econometrica, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 277-304.
  12. Engle, R.F. and D.F. Hendry (1993), “Testing Super-exogeneity and Invariance in Regression Models”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 56, pp. 119-139.
  13. Estrella, A. and F.S. Mishkin (1997), “Is There a Role for Monetary Aggregates in the Conduct of Monetary Policy?”, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 40, pp. 279-304.
  14. Favero, C and D.F. Hendry (1992), “Testing the Lucas’ Critique: A Review”, Econometric Reviews, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 265-306.
  15. Fisher, I. (1911).
  16. The Purchasing Power of Money, New York, MacMillan Ltd. Fisher, M.E. and J.J. Seater (1993), “Long-Run Neutrality and Superneutrality in an ARIMA Framework”, American Economic Review, Vol. 83, pp. 402-415.
  17. Fitzgerald, T.J. (1999), “Money Growth and Inflati