Journals / Sakarya İktisat Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

EFFECTS OF GERMAN-TURKISH INDUSTRIAL POLICIES ON MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY COMPETITIVENESS

Pages
405–434
Publication Date
2020-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Turkey has moderate comparative advantage in exports by low technology intensity and weak competitive comparative advantage in exports in medium technology intensity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main purpose of this study is to examine the effects of German-Turkish industry policies on manufacturing industry competitiveness.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In accordance with this purpose, firstly, industrial policies of both countries will be discussed theoretically within the framework of Industry 4.0 basic approach.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Turkey has moderate comparative advantage in exports by low technology intensity and weak competitive comparative advantage in exports in medium technology intensity.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Industrial Policy · Revealed Comparative Advantage Index · Germany

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to examine the effects of German-Turkish industry policies on manufacturing industry competitiveness. In accordance with this purpose, firstly, industrial policies of both countries will be discussed theoretically within the framework of Industry 4.0 basic approach. Secondly, the manufacturing industries of both countries will be compared in terms of selected indicators such as productivity, capacity utilization rates, value added, production index, R&D expenditures and employment. During the implemantation phase, the competitiveness of German-Turkish manufacturing industries in exports will be analyzed for the years 1996-2019, which covers the post-Customs Union period. SITC Rev.3, 3-digit product and / or product groups in the UN Commercial Statistics Database (UN Comtrade) are used as the data set for the analysis in question. Competitiveness values in exports for a total of 134 products and / or product groups with low, medium and high technology intensity according to technology levels are calculated separately for both countries and technology groups with Béla Balassa’s Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) Index. The answer of the question why German manufacturing industry exports between 1996 and 2018 is not strong or moderate and only weak compatitive in high technology density can be given with the shift of the production to Eastern countries especially to China due to the economic and geographical cost advantages. Turkey has moderate comparative advantage in exports by low technology intensity and weak competitive comparative advantage in exports in medium technology intensity.

Özet

The main purpose of this study is to examine the effects of German-Turkish industry policies on manufacturing industry competitiveness. In accordance with this purpose, firstly, industrial policies of both countries will be discussed theoretically within the framework of Industry 4.0 basic approach. Secondly, the manufacturing industries of both countries will be compared in terms of selected indicators such as productivity, capacity utilization rates, value added, production index, R&D expenditures and employment. During the implemantation phase, the competitiveness of German-Turkish manufacturing industries in exports will be analyzed for the years 1996-2019, which covers the post-Customs Union period. SITC Rev.3, 3-digit product and / or product groups in the UN Commercial Statistics Database (UN Comtrade) are used as the data set for the analysis in question. Competitiveness values in exports for a total of 134 products and / or product groups with low, medium and high technology intensity according to technology levels are calculated separately for both countries and technology groups with Béla Balassa’s Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) Index. The answer of the question why German manufacturing industry exports between 1996 and 2018 is not strong or moderate and only weak compatitive in high technology density can be given with the shift of the production to Eastern countries especially to China due to the economic and geographical cost advantages. Turkey has moderate comparative advantage in exports by low technology intensity and weak competitive comparative advantage in exports in medium technology intensity.

🔖

Cite This Article

CELIKOK, K., SAATCIOGLU, C. (2020). EFFECTS OF GERMAN-TURKISH INDUSTRIAL POLICIES ON MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY COMPETITIVENESS. Sakarya İktisat Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 405–434. https://ajindex.com/articles/843390

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. AKKOYUNLU, A. & MIHCI, S. (2006): ‘‘Effects of Customs Union with European Union on the Market Structure and Pricing Behaviour of Turkish Manufacturing Industry’’, Applied Economics, Vol.: 38, Issue: 20. ALTAY, B. & GURPINAR, K. (2008): ‘‘Açıklanmış Karşılaştırmalı Üstünlükler ve Bazı Rekabet Gücü Endeksleri: Türk Mobilya Sektörü Üzerine Bir Uygulama’’, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi,
  2. İ.İ.B.F Dergisi, Cilt:10, Sayı: 1, 2008, s. 257-274.
  3. ATIYAS, İ. & BAKIS, O. (2015): ‘‘Structural Change and Industrial Policy in Turkey’’, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Vol.: 51, Issue: 6, pp. 1209-1229.
  4. BALASSA, B. (1965): ‘‘Trade Liberalisation and ―Revealed‖ Comparative Advantage’’, The Manchester School, Vol.: 33, Issue:2, pp. 99-123.
  5. BANGER, G. (2016): Endüstri 4.0 ve Akıllı İşletme, Ankara,
  6. Dorlion Yayınları.
  7. BARTHOLOMAE, F. W. (2018): ‘‘Ökonomische Auswirkungen der Digitalisierung auf den internationalen Wettbewerb und die internationale Arbeitsteilung’’, Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge, Universität der Bundeswehr München. BULUT, E. & AKCACI, T. (2017): ‘‘Endüstri 4.0 ve İnovasyon Göstergeleri Kapsamında Türkiye Analizi‘‘, ASSAM Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi, Sayı.:7, s. 50-72.
  8. DOGRU, B.N. & MECIK, O. (2018): ‘‘Türkiye‘de Endüstri 4.0‘ın İşgücü Piyasasına Etkileri: Firma Beklentileri‘‘, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 23, s. 1581- 1606. EGILMEZ, M. (2018): Tarihsel Süreç İçerisinde Dünya Ekonomisi, İstanbul, Remzi Kitabevi, 2018.
  9. ERBER, G. (2016): ‘‘Industrial Policy in Germany after the Global Financial and Economic Crisis’’, SSRN Electronic Journal, pp. 1-38.
  10. FERTÖ, I. & HUBBARD, L.G. (2003): ‘‘Revealed Comparative Advantage and Competitiveness in Hungarian Agri–Food Sectors’’, The World Economy, Vol.:26, Issue: 2, pp. 247-259.
  11. HINLOOPEN, J. & MARREWIJK, C. (2001): ‘‘On the empirical distribution of the Balassa index’’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol.:137, Issue:1, pp.1-35. ILO: ‘‘Annual growth rate of output per worker (GDP constant 2010 US $)’’, (Online) https://www.ilo.org/shinyapps/bulkexplorer1/?lang=en&segment=indicator&id=SDG_A821_NOC_RT_A, 15.07.2020. INVESTOPEDIA: ‘‘Business: Business Essentials: Why You Should Invest in Research and Development (R&D)’’, (Çevrimiçi) https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/043015/what-arebenefits-research-and-development-company.asp, 10.08.2020.
  12. KHATIBI, A. (2008): ‘‘Kazakhstan's revealed comparative advantage vis-à-vis the EU-27’’, ECIPE Working Paper, No. 03/2008