Journals / Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 13

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ROLE PERCEPTIONS, ORGANISATIONAL CYNICISM AND PERCEIVED PERFORMANCE

ÖRGÜTLERDE İŞ ROLÜ ALGILARI, SİNİZM VE ALGILANAN PERFORMANS ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Pages
476–486
Publication Date
2017-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that after controlling relevant variables, each role perception variable and workplace’s cynicism contributed significantly to organisational cynicism.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this stduy is to examine the relationship between role ambiguity, role conflict, organisational cynicism and perceived performance. 233 people from two different public universities located in İstanbul and Ankara participated in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Of those, 56% were female and 44% were male, whose ages ranged between 23 and 38.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that after controlling relevant variables, each role perception variable and workplace’s cynicism contributed significantly to organisational cynicism.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Rol Belirsizliği · Rol Çatışması · Örgütsel Sinizm

Abstract

The purpose of this stduy is to examine the relationship between role ambiguity, role conflict, organisational cynicism and perceived performance. 233 people from two different public universities located in İstanbul and Ankara participated in this study. Of those, 56% were female and 44% were male, whose ages ranged between 23 and 38. A number of scales, such as Brandes’s 1997 Organisational cynicism scale, Rizzo et.al.’s 1970 Role ambiguity and Role conflict scales, Sigler and Pearson’s 2000 Perceived performance scale were employed in this study. The internal consistency reliabilities of the scales were between 0,76 and 0,91. It was found that after controlling relevant variables, each role perception variable and workplace’s cynicism contributed significantly to organisational cynicism. Additionally it was found that there is significant relationship between role perceptions, organisational cynicism and perceived performance. Finally, the implications and limitations of the study were discussed

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı iş rolü algıları, örgütsel sinizm ve algılanan performans arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. Bu amaçla yapılan araştırmaya İstanbul ve Ankara’da faaliyet gösteren iki devlet üniversitesinde çalışan 233 araştırma görevlisi katılmıştır. Katılımcıların %56’sını kadınlar, %44’ünü erkekler oluşturmakta ve yaşları 23 ile 38 arasında değişmektedir. Araştırmada Brandes’in 1997 Örgütsel Sinizm ölçeği, Rizzo ve çalışma arkadaşlarının 1970 Rol Belirsizliği ve Rol Çatışması ölçekleri, Sigler ve Pearson’un 2000 Algılanan Bireysel Performans ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Kullanılan ölçeklerin güvenilirlik katsayıları kabul edilebilir düzeydedir 0,76–0,91 arası . Değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemek amacıyla korelasyon analizi, örgütsel sinizmi yordayan faktörleri belirlemek için regresyon analizi, değişkenlerin kendi içinde demografik faktörlere göre değişimini belirlemek amacıyla t-testi ve Anova analizi yapılmıştır. Sonuçta, iş rolü algıları ile performans algısı arasında anlamlı ilişki; sinizm ve performans algısı arasında negatif ve zayıf ilişki, iş rolü algıları ve çalışma ortamı sinizminin örgütsel sinizmi anlamlı şekilde yordadığı bulgularına ulaşılmıştır. Sonuç bölümüne bu bulguların olası gerekçeleri tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKÇAY, V. H. (2017). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ROLE PERCEPTIONS, ORGANISATIONAL CYNICISM AND PERCEIVED PERFORMANCE. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 13, 476–486. https://ajindex.com/articles/170253

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abraham, R. (2000). Organizational Cynicism: Bases and Consequences. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 126 (3), 269- 292. Akçay, V. H., (2017). Cynicism at Universities: A Research Based on Pervasion of Academics’s Cynicism and its Relationship with Performance, Developments in Social Sciences, Sofia St. Kliment Ohridski University, 185-199. (Basım aşamasında). Andersson, L. M. (1996). Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework. Human Relations, 49, 1395–1418.
  2. Andersson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. (1997). Cynicism in the Workplace: Some Causes and Effects. The Journal of Organizational Behavior. 18, 449-470.
  3. Baysal Can, A., & Tekarslan, E. (1996). İşletmeler için Davranış Bilimleri. 2.Bası. İstanbul:
  4. Avcıol Basım Yayın. Becker, H., & Geer, B. (1961). Boys in White. Chicago: University of Press.
  5. Bommer, W. H., Rich, G. A., & Rubin, R. S. (2005). Changing attitudes about change: Longitudinal effects of transformational leader behavior on employee cynicism about organizational change, Journal of Organizational Behavior. 26. 733–753.
  6. Brandes, P. M. (1997). Organizational Cynicism: Its Nature, Antecedents, and Consequences (Dissertation of Doctor of Philosophy). The University of Cincinnati. Brandes, P., & Das, D. (2006). Locating Behaviour Cynicism at Work: Construct Issues and Performance Implications, Employee Health, Coping and Methodologies (Edt. Pamela L.Perrewe, Daniel C. Ganster). New York: JAI Press. 233-266.
  7. Brandes, P., Dharwadkar, R., & Dean, J. W. (1999). Does organizational cynicism matter?: Employee and supervisor perspectives on work outcomes. Paper Presented at the Eastern Academy of Management. Philadelphia. Brown, S., & Peterson, R. (1993). Antecedents and Consequences of Salesperson Job Satisfaction: Meta-Analysis And Assessment of Causal Effects, Journal of Marke- ting Research, 30 (1), 63-78.
  8. Byrne, Z., & Hochwarter, W. A. (2008). Perceived organizational support and performance: Relationships across levels of organizational cynicism. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 54–72.
  9. Cartwright, S., & Holmes, N. (2006). The Meaning of Work: The Challenge of Regaining Employee Engagement and Reducing Cynicism. Human Resource Management Review, 16 (2), 199–208.
  10. Chiaburu, D. S., Peng, A. C., Oh, I., Banks, G.C., & Lomeli, L.C. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of employee organizational cynicism: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83,181–197
  11. Cohen, A. (1998). An Examination of The Relatio