SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sürdürülebilir Mühendislik Uygulamaları ve Teknolojik Gelişmeler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1

Real-Time Chaos on Embedded Hardware: A Critical Review of Implementation, Observation and Control

Gömülü Donanımda Gerçek Zamanlı Kaos: Gerçekleme, Gözlem ve Kontrol Üzerine Eleştirel Bir Derleme

Berk Demirsoy(ZONGULDAK BÜLENT ECEVİT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0003-3489-7346
Mert Süleyman Demirsoy(SAKARYA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7905-2254
Yusuf Hamida El Naser(SAKARYA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-4757-6288
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The main conclusion of the review is that hardware studies of chaos provide different levels of evidence about numerical dynamics, timing, analog observation and control behavior, and that these can only be compared once they are clearly separated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Generating chaotic flows on digital hardware is a broader research problem than simply moving a differential equation solver onto an embedded processor.
📊
Key Findings & Data:When a state variable is observed on a screen, the visible trace is shaped jointly by the chosen numerical method, finite precision, the sampling rate, analog conversion and, if present, feedback.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The main conclusion of the review is that hardware studies of chaos provide different levels of evidence about numerical dynamics, timing, analog observation and control behavior, and that these can only be compared once they are clearly separated.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:kaotik diferansiyel denklemler · dijital sinyal işlemci · gerçek zamanlı hesaplama

Abstract

Generating chaotic flows on digital hardware is a broader research problem than simply moving a differential equation solver onto an embedded processor. When a state variable is observed on a screen, the visible trace is shaped jointly by the chosen numerical method, finite precision, the sampling rate, analog conversion and, if present, feedback. The aim of this review is to evaluate, within a common critical framework, experimental studies on implementing continuous-time chaotic models on digital signal processors (DSPs) and related embedded hardware, on observing them with an oscilloscope through a digital-to-analog converter (DAC), and on changing the control gain during operation. The initial literature pool was complemented by a documented search of the Directory of Open Access Journals (135 records, 118 screened, 79 eligible), and the implementation parameters of representative studies were extracted into a common table. Integer-order and fractional-order flows, microcontroller and field-programmable gate array (FPGA) examples, and different chaos control objectives are treated separately. The reviewed studies show that numerical attractors can be produced as analog signals and that, in some set-ups, stabilization or synchronization is achieved in hardware. However, the integration step, the physical update period and the number format are seldom reported together, validation is mostly visual, and only a few studies close the loop around a physical analog chaotic circuit. In addition, an attractor on the oscilloscope does not, on its own, prove that the state update is completed on time at every sample, or that a feedback gain changed by an operator remains stabilizing during the transition; this question should be framed with the existing theory of switched, slowly varying and gain-scheduled systems. Apparent methodological differences between studies cannot be treated as direct performance contradictions when the same model, integration step and validation criterion are not used. The main conclusion of the review is that hardware studies of chaos provide different levels of evidence about numerical dynamics, timing, analog observation and control behavior, and that these can only be compared once they are clearly separated.

Özet

Kaotik akışların dijital donanımda oluşturulması, bir diferansiyel denklem çözücüsünün gömülü bir işlemciye aktarılmasından daha kapsamlı bir araştırma sorunudur. Bir durum değişkeni ekranda gözlendiğinde görülen iz; seçilen sayısal yöntem, sonlu duyarlık, örnekleme hızı, analog dönüşüm ve varsa geri besleme tarafından birlikte belirlenir. Bu derlemenin amacı, sürekli zamanlı kaotik modellerin dijital sinyal işlemciler (DSP) ve ilgili gömülü donanımlarda gerçeklenmesine, dijital-analog dönüştürücü (DAC) aracılığıyla osiloskopla gözlenmesine ve çalışma sırasında kontrol kazancının değiştirilmesine ilişkin deneysel çalışmaları ortak bir eleştirel çerçevede değerlendirmektir. Tam mertebeli ve kesirli mertebeli akışlar, mikrodenetleyici ve alanda programlanabilir kapı dizisi (FPGA) örnekleri ile farklı kaos kontrol hedefleri ayrı ayrı ele alınmıştır. İncelenen çalışmalar, sayısal çekicilerin analog sinyal olarak üretilebildiğini ve bazı düzeneklerde kararlılaştırma veya eşzamanlamanın donanımda sağlandığını göstermektedir. Bununla birlikte osiloskopta bir çekicinin görülmesi, durum güncellemesinin her örnekte zamanında tamamlandığını veya operatör tarafından değiştirilen bir geri besleme kazancının geçiş boyunca kararlı kaldığını tek başına kanıtlamaz. Aynı model, integrasyon adımı ve doğrulama ölçütü kullanılmadığında çalışmalar arasındaki görünür yöntem farklılıkları doğrudan başarım çelişkisi olarak yorumlanamaz. Derlemenin temel sonucu, kaos üzerine yapılan donanım çalışmalarının sayısal dinamik, zamanlama, analog gözlem ve kontrol davranışına ilişkin farklı kanıt düzeyleri sunduğu ve bu kanıtların ancak açıkça ayrıştırıldıklarında karşılaştırılabileceğidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Demirsoy, B., Demirsoy, M. S., Naser, Y. H. E. (2026). Real-Time Chaos on Embedded Hardware: A Critical Review of Implementation, Observation and Control. Sürdürülebilir Mühendislik Uygulamaları ve Teknolojik Gelişmeler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1. https://doi.org/10.51764/smutgd.2051390

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (78)

  1. Azzaz, M. S., Tanougast, C., Sadoudi, S., Fellah, R., & Dandache, A. (2013). A new auto-switched chaotic system and its FPGA implementation. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 18(7), 1792–1804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2012.11.025
  2. Babajans, R., Cirjulina, D., & Kolosovs, D. (2025). Field-programmable gate array-based chaos oscillator implementation for analog–discrete and discrete–analog chaotic synchronization applications. Entropy, 27(4), 334. https://doi.org/10.3390/e27040334
  3. Boccaletti, S., Grebogi, C., Lai, Y.-C., Mancini, H., & Maza, D. (2000). The control of chaos: theory and applications. Physics Reports, 329(3), 103–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0370-1573(99)00096-4
  4. Bulut, S., Pehlivan, I., & Arıcıoğlu, B. (2026). Cost-effective hardware realization of chaotic systems via high-performance STM32 DAC interface. Chaos and Fractals, 3(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.69882/adba.chf.2026013
  5. Carroll, T. L., & Pecora, L. M. (1991). Synchronizing chaotic circuits. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 38(4), 453–456. https://doi.org/10.1109/31.75404
  6. Chen, G., & Ueta, T. (1999). Yet another chaotic attractor. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 9(7), 1465–1466. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218127499001024
  7. Chua, L., Komuro, M., & Matsumoto, T. (1986). The double scroll family. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 33(11), 1072–1118. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcs.1986.1085869
  8. Cuomo, K. M., & Oppenheim, A. V. (1993). Circuit implementation of synchronized chaos with applications to communications. Physical Review Letters, 71(1), 65–68. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.71.65
  9. Dai, S., Sun, K., He, S., & Ai, W. (2019). Complex chaotic attractor via fractal transformation. Entropy, 21(11), 1115. https://doi.org/10.3390/e21111115
  10. Damaj, I., Zaher, A., & Lawand, W. (2024). Optimizing FPGA implementation of high-precision chaotic systems for improved performance. PLOS ONE, 19(4), e0299021. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299021
  11. Demirsoy, M. S., & Hamida El Naser, Y. (2026). Dynamical analysis and robust chaos suppression of the Newton-Leipnik system via sliding mode control. Dicle Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Mühendislik Dergisi, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.24012/dumf.1964154
  12. Demirsoy, M. S., Sarıkaya, M. S., Kurnaz, S., Hamida El Naser, Y., Hazar, M. A., Coşkun, S., Kutlu, M. Ç., & Hazar, G. (2025). Enhancing stirring performance through chaotic position control in a magnetic stirrer. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 47, Article 580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-025-05840-2
  13. Desoer, C. A. (1969). Slowly varying system ẋ = A(t)x. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 14(6), 780–781. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1969.1099336
  14. Ditto, W. L., Rauseo, S. N., & Spano, M. L. (1990). Experimental control of chaos. Physical Review Letters, 65(26), 3211–3214. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.3211
  15. Dormand, J. R., & Prince, P. J. (1980). A family of embedded Runge-Kutta formulae. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 6(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0771-050x(80)90013-3
  16. Emin, B., & Yaz, M. (2024). Digital implementation of chaotic systems using Nvidia Jetson AGX Orin and custom DAC converter. Chaos and Fractals, 1(1), 38–41. https://doi.org/10.69882/adba.chf.2024075
  17. Fradkov, A. L., & Evans, R. J. (2005). Control of chaos: Methods and applications in engineering. Annual Reviews in Control, 29(1), 33–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2005.01.001
  18. Fridman, E. (2010). A refined input delay approach to sampled-data control. Automatica, 46(2), 421–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2009.11.017
  19. Fridman, E., Seuret, A., & Richard, J. P. (2004). Robust sampled-data stabilization of linear systems: an input delay approach. Automatica, 40(8), 1441–1446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2004.03.003 Goldberg, D. (1991). What every computer scientist should know about floating-point arithmetic. ACM Computing Surveys, 23(1), 5–48. https://doi.org/10.1145/103162.103163
  20. Gottwald, G. A., & Melbourne, I. (2004). A new test for chaos in deterministic systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 460(2042), 603–611. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2003.1183
  21. Grebogi, C., Hammel, S. M., Yorke, J. A., & Sauer, T. (1990). Shadowing of physical trajectories in chaotic dynamics: Containment and refinement. Physical Review Letters, 65(13), 1527–1530. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.65.1527
  22. Guillén-Fernández, O., Meléndez-Cano, A., Tlelo-Cuautle, E., Núñez-Pérez, J. C., & Rangel-Magdaleno, J. de J. (2019). On the synchronization techniques of chaotic oscillators and their FPGA-based implementation for secure image transmission. PLOS ONE, 14(2), e0209618. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209618
  23. Guo, Z., Wen, J., & Mou, J. (2023). Dynamic analysis and DSP implementation of memristor chaotic systems with multiple forms of hidden attractors. Mathematics, 11(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11010024
  24. Hamida El Naser, Y., Demirsoy, B., Erin, K., & Demirsoy, M. S. (2025). Chaotic speed control of a DC motor using the Sprott-A system for robotic end-effector applications. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, 8(5), 1406–1414. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1703012
  25. Hammel, S. M., Yorke, J. A., & Grebogi, C. (1987). Do numerical orbits of chaotic dynamical processes represent true orbits? Journal of Complexity, 3(2), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-064x(87)90024-0
  26. He, S., Sun, K., & Wang, H. (2015). Complexity analysis and DSP implementation of the fractional-order Lorenz hyperchaotic system. Entropy, 17(12), 8299–8311. https://doi.org/10.3390/e17127882
  27. Hespanha, J. P., & Morse, A. S. (1999). Stability of switched systems with average dwell-time. In Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Vol. 3, pp. 2655–2660). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.1999.831330
  28. Karimov, A., Shirnin, K., Babkin, I., Burundukov, P., Rybin, V., & Butusov, D. (2026). Time-reversible synchronization of Chua circuits for edge intelligent sensors. Mathematics, 14(8), 1359. https://doi.org/10.3390/math14081359
  29. Kent, R. M., Barbosa, W. A. S., & Gauthier, D. J. (2024). Controlling chaos using edge computing hardware. Nature Communications, 15, 3886. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48133-3
  30. Khalil, H. K. (2002). Nonlinear systems (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
  31. Kocarev, L., & Parlitz, U. (1995). General approach for chaotic synchronization with applications to communication. Physical Review Letters, 74(25), 5028–5031. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.74.5028
  32. Köse, E., & Mühürcü, A. (2017). Realization of a digital chaotic oscillator by using a low cost microcontroller. Engineering Review, 37(3), 341–348. https://hrcak.srce.hr/184823
  33. Koyuncu, İ., Özcerit, A. T., & Pehlivan, İ. (2014). Implementation of FPGA-based real time novel chaotic oscillator. Nonlinear Dynamics, 77(1-2), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-014-1272-x
  34. Li, S., Chen, G., & Mou, X. (2005). On the dynamical degradation of digital piecewise linear chaotic maps. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 15(10), 3119–3151. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127405014052
  35. Lian, K.-Y., Liu, P., Chiang, T.-S., & Chiu, C.-S. (2002). Adaptive synchronization design for chaotic systems via a scalar driving signal. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Fundamental Theory and Applications, 49(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/81.974871
  36. Liberzon, D. (2003). Switching in systems and control. Birkhäuser. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0017-8
  37. Liberzon, D., & Morse, A. S. (1999). Basic problems in stability and design of switched systems. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 19(5), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1109/37.793443
  38. Liu, C. L., & Layland, J. W. (1973). Scheduling algorithms for multiprogramming in a hard-real-time environment. Journal of the ACM, 20(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1145/321738.321743
  39. Liu, X., Mou, J., Wang, J., Banerjee, S., & Li, P. (2022). Dynamical analysis of a novel fractional-order chaotic system based on memcapacitor and meminductor. Fractal and Fractional, 6(11), 671. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6110671
  40. Lorenz, E. N. (1963). Deterministic nonperiodic flow. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 20(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020 2.0.co;2
  41. Matsumoto, T. (1984). A chaotic attractor from Chua's circuit. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 31(12), 1055–1058. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcs.1984.1085459
  42. Méndez-Ramírez, R., Arellano-Delgado, A., Murillo-Escobar, M., & Cruz-Hernández, C. (2019). Degradation analysis of chaotic systems and their digital implementation in embedded systems. Complexity, 2019, 9863982. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9863982
  43. Merah, L., Ali-Pacha, A., Said, N. H., & Mamat, M. (2013). Design and FPGA implementation of Lorenz chaotic system for information security issues. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 7(5), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.12988/ams.2013.13022
  44. Natsheh, A. N., Kettleborough, J. G., & Janson, N. B. (2009). Experimental study of controlling chaos in a DC–DC boost converter. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 40(5), 2500–2508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2007.10.048
  45. Nepomuceno, E. G., & Mendes, E. M. A. M. (2017). On the analysis of pseudo-orbits of continuous chaotic nonlinear systems simulated using discretization schemes in a digital computer. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 95, 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2016.12.002
  46. Nešić, D., & Teel, A. R. (2004). A framework for stabilization of nonlinear sampled-data systems based on their approximate discrete-time models. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 49(7), 1103–1122. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2004.831175
  47. Ott, E., Grebogi, C., & Yorke, J. A. (1990). Controlling chaos. Physical Review Letters, 64(11), 1196–1199. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.64.1196
  48. Ozcan, A. B., Bayezit, I., & Tekyurt, M. (2025). Stabilization of chaotic systems using hardware-in-the-loop validation for sliding mode control and input state linearization. The Journal of Engineering, 2025(1), e70127. https://doi.org/10.1049/tje2.70127
  49. Pano-Azucena, A. D., Ovilla-Martinez, B., Tlelo-Cuautle, E., Muñoz-Pacheco, J. M., & de la Fraga, L. G. (2019). FPGA-based implementation of different families of fractional-order chaotic oscillators applying Grünwald–Letnikov method. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 72, 516–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2019.01.014
  50. Pecora, L. M., & Carroll, T. L. (1990). Synchronization in chaotic systems. Physical Review Letters, 64(8), 821–824. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.64.821
  51. Pyragas, K. (1992). Continuous control of chaos by self-controlling feedback. Physics Letters A, 170(6), 421–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(92)90745-8
  52. Rameshbabu, R., & Suresh, G. R. (2020). Design of adaptive feedback control for new 3D chaotic system and its digital implementation on FPGA. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 13(20), 1977–1990. https://doi.org/10.17485/IJST/v13i20.498
  53. Rivera-Blas, R., Rodríguez Paredes, S. A., Flores-Herrera, L. A., & Adrián Romero, I. (2019). Design and implementation of a microcontroller based active controller for the synchronization of the Petrzela chaotic system. Computation, 7(3), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation7030040
  54. Rodríguez-Muñoz, J. D., Tavizón-Aldama, J. D., & Tlelo-Cuautle, E. (2024). Experimental Observation of Chaotic Attractors from the FPGA implementation of 3D Chaotic Systems. IETE Journal of Education, 65(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09747338.2023.2267515
  55. Rosenstein, M. T., Collins, J. J., & De Luca, C. J. (1993). A practical method for calculating largest Lyapunov exponents from small data sets. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 65(1–2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(93)90009-P
  56. Rössler, O. E. (1976). An equation for continuous chaos. Physics Letters A, 57(5), 397–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(76)90101-8
  57. Rugh, W. J., & Shamma, J. S. (2000). Research on gain scheduling. Automatica, 36(10), 1401–1425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-1098(00)00058-3
  58. Sambas, A., Vaidyanathan, S., Tlelo-Cuautle, E., Zhang, S., Guillén-Fernández, O., Sukono, Hidayat, Y., & Gundara, G. (2019). A novel chaotic system with two circles of equilibrium points: Multistability, electronic circuit and FPGA realization. Electronics, 8(11), 1211. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8111211
  59. Sarıkaya, M. S., Demirsoy, M. S., & Hamida El Naser, Y. (2026). Robust local stabilization of the Moore–Spiegel chaotic oscillator via Grey Wolf Optimizer-based pole placement. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 42(3). https://doi.org/10.65520/erciyesfen.1974950
  60. Sarıkaya, M. S., Demirsoy, M. S., & Kutlu, M. Ç. (2025). Design of a chaotic speed-controlled mixing device and efficiency analysis in biogas. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, 8(3), 672–679. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1639478
  61. Sauer, T., Grebogi, C., & Yorke, J. A. (1997). How long do numerical chaotic solutions remain valid? Physical Review Letters, 79(1), 59–62. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.79.59
  62. Shampine, L. F. (1986). Some practical Runge-Kutta formulas. Mathematics of Computation, 46(173), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1090/s0025-5718-1986-0815836-3
  63. Shampine, L. F., & Reichelt, M. W. (1997). The MATLAB ODE Suite. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 18(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1137/s1064827594276424
  64. Shi, S., Xiong, J., Liu, L., & Du, C. (2026). Analysis and application of a 3D chaotic system with flexible offset and frequency control. Entropy, 28(3), 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/e28030260
  65. Song, Q., Chang, H., & Li, Y. (2020). Complex dynamics of a novel chaotic system based on an active memristor. Electronics, 9(3), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9030410
  66. Sprott, J. C. (1994). Some simple chaotic flows. Physical Review E, 50(2), R647–R650. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.50.r647
  67. Tagne, S., Bodo, B., Ayissi Eyebe, G. F. V., & Eyebe Fouda, J. S. A. (2022). PIC micro-controller based synchronization of two fractional order jerk systems. Scientific Reports, 12, 14281. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17029-x
  68. Texas Instruments. (2006). DAC8552: 16-bit, dual-channel, ultralow glitch, voltage output digital-to-analog converter (Data sheet, Rev. A). https://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/dac8552
  69. Texas Instruments. (2024). TMS320F2837xD dual-core real-time microcontrollers (Data sheet SPRS880P). https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/sprs880
  70. Tlelo-Cuautle, E., Rangel-Magdaleno, J., & de la Fraga, L. G. (2016). Engineering applications of FPGAs: Chaotic systems, artificial neural networks, random number generators, and secure communication systems. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34115-6
  71. Tuna, M., Alçın, M., Koyuncu, İ., Fidan, C. B., & Pehlivan, İ. (2019). High speed FPGA-based chaotic oscillator design. Microprocessors and Microsystems, 66, 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2019.02.012
  72. Wang, H., Sun, K., & He, S. (2015). Characteristic analysis and DSP realization of fractional-order simplified Lorenz system based on Adomian decomposition method. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 25(6), 1550085. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127415500856
  73. Wang, Z., Liu, B., Zhang, Y., Cheng, M., Chu, K., & Xu, L. (2016). The chaotic-based control of three-port isolated bidirectional DC/DC converters for electric and hybrid vehicles. Energies, 9(2), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9020083
  74. Wolf, A., Swift, J. B., Swinney, H. L., & Vastano, J. A. (1985). Determining Lyapunov exponents from a time series. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 16(3), 285–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(85)90011-9
  75. Yang, X.-B., He, Y.-G., Li, C.-L., & Liu, C.-Q. (2020). Analysis, stabilization, and DSP-based implementation of a chaotic system with nonhyperbolic equilibrium. Complexity, 2020, Article 6786832. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6786832
  76. Yau, H.-T., Pu, Y.-C., & Li, S. C. (2011). An FPGA-based PID controller design for chaos synchronization by evolutionary programming. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2011, 516031. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/516031
  77. Yeniçeri, R., Vardar, A., & Yalçın, M. E. (2017). Full digital implementation of a chaotic time-delay sampled-data system. In 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) (pp. 1–4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/iscas.2017.8050862
  78. Yesil, A., Gokyildirim, A., Babacan, Y., & Calgan, H. (2025). A novel memristive chaotic jerk circuit and its microcontroller-based sliding mode control. Journal of Vibration and Control, 31(17–18), 3845–3864. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775463241278038