SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kent Akademisi / 2025 / Cilt: 18 Sayı: 6

The Potential Role of Technology and Innovation Management in Public Administration for Disaster Management: The Case of Japan

Kamu Yönetiminde Teknoloji ve Yenilik Yönetiminin Afet Yönetiminde Kullanım Potansiyeli: Japonya Örneği

Senem Demirkıran(KIRKLARELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9835-4963
Pages
3251–3278
Publication Date
2025-11-20
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Within this framework, the potential of new technological developments like data analytics, artificial intelligence, remote sensing, and mobile technologies to increase disaster response capabilities is evaluated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Public administration in technology and innovation management holds critical importance, especially in disaster management.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article extensively examines Japan's strategies in using technology and innovation management to combat natural disasters.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Within this framework, the potential of new technological developments like data analytics, artificial intelligence, remote sensing, and mobile technologies to increase disaster response capabilities is evaluated.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kamu Yönetimi · Teknoloji ve Yenilik Yönetimi · Afet Yönetimi.

Abstract

Public administration in technology and innovation management holds critical importance, especially in disaster management. This article extensively examines Japan's strategies in using technology and innovation management to combat natural disasters. As a country frequently facing earthquakes, tsunamis, and typhoons, Japan has developed comprehensive and advanced technological solutions for these events. Innovative approaches such as early warning systems, structural reinforcement techniques, and emergency management systems have effectively reduced Japan's disaster risk. The article aims to present Japan's successes in disaster management as a model for other countries, contributing to the identification of appropriate strategies for regions prone to disaster risks. Additionally, it investigates how technology and innovation management can be integrated before, during, and after disasters to enhance management processes. Within this framework, the potential of new technological developments like data analytics, artificial intelligence, remote sensing, and mobile technologies to increase disaster response capabilities is evaluated.

Özet

Kamu yönetiminde teknoloji ve yenilik yönetimi, özellikle afet yönetimi alanında kritik bir öneme sahiptir. Bu makale, Japonya'nın doğal afetlerle mücadelede kullandığı teknoloji ve yenilik yönetimi stratejilerini detaylı olarak ele almaktadır. Japonya, deprem, tsunami ve tayfun gibi sık sık tekrarlayan doğal afetlerle mücadele eden bir ülke olarak bu olaylara yönelik kapsamlı ve ileri düzeyde teknolojik çözümler geliştirmiştir. Erken uyarı sistemleri, yapısal güçlendirme teknikleri ve acil durum yönetim sistemleri gibi yenilikçi yaklaşımlar, Japonya'nın afet riskini azaltmada etkili olmaktadır. Makale, Japonya'nın afet yönetimindeki başarılarını diğer ülkeler için bir model olarak sunarak, afet riski ile karşı karşıya olan bölgeler için uygun stratejilerin belirlenmesine katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Ayrıca, teknoloji ve yenilik yönetiminin afet öncesi, sırası ve sonrasında nasıl entegre edilebileceğini ve yönetim süreçlerinin nasıl iyileştirilebileceğini araştırmaktadır. Bu çerçevede, veri analitiği, yapay zekâ, uzaktan algılama ve mobil teknolojiler gibi yeni teknolojik gelişmelerin afet müdahale kapasitesini artırma potansiyeli değerlendirilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Demirkıran, S. (2025). The Potential Role of Technology and Innovation Management in Public Administration for Disaster Management: The Case of Japan. Kent Akademisi, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 6, 3251–3278. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1753530

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (97)

  1. Akdaş, G. (2021). Bütünleşik Afet Yönetimi Gelişim Sürecinde Türkiye'de Güvenli Konut (Master's thesis, Dokuz Eylul Universitesi (Turkey)).
  2. Alexander, D. (2000). Confronting catastrophe: New perspectives on natural disasters. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  3. Basic Act on Disaster Management. (1961). Japan Government. Retrieved from https://www.japan.go.jp
  4. Bakır, Ş. Ş. N. Y. (2021). Bölüm 16 Kentsel Planlama Çalışmalarında Bütünleşik Afet Yönetim Sistemi. Mimarlık Bilimlerinde Araştırma Ve Uygulamalar-I, 407.
  5. Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., & Wisner, B. (2004). At risk: natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters. Routledge
  6. Birkmann, J., & Pelling, M. (2006). Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient societies. United Nations University.
  7. Brunetta, G., Caldarice, O., Tollin, N., Rosas-Casals, M., & Morató, J. (Eds.). (2018). Urban resilience for risk and adaptation governance: Theory and practice. Springer.
  8. Bresnahan, T. F., Gambardella, A., (Eds.). (2001). Building high-tech clusters: Silicon Valley and beyond. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Bulut, Y., & Aslan, M. (2022). Doğal Afetlere Karşı Dirençli Kentler Oluşturmaya İlişkin Yenilikçi Yaklaşımlar: Akıllı Kent Uygulamaları Üzerine Bir İnceleme. H. Ateş İçinde, Dirençli Şehirler İçin Vizyoner Yönetim, 9-24.
  10. Büyükkaracığan, N. (2016). Türkiye’de Yerel Yönetimlerde Kriz ve Afet Yönetim Çalişmalarinin Mevzuat Açisindan Değerlendirilmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Teknik Araştırmalar Dergisi, (12), 195-219.
  11. Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. (2023). The Constitution of Japan. Retrieved from https://www.cao.go.jp/index-e.html
  12. Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. Earthquake Early Warning System. (2024). Accessed online: https://www.bousai.go.jp/jishin/kyoshin_system/
  13. Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. Tsunami Evacuation Guide. Accessed online: https://www.bousai.go.jp/kyoiku/kyoiku/en/tsunami_evacuation_guide_e.html
  14. Chmutina, K., & Von Meding, J. (2019). A dilemma of language:“Natural disasters” in academic literature. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 10, 283-292.
  15. Christensen, C. M., & Overdorf, M. (2000). "Meeting the challenge of disruptive change." Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 66-76.
  16. Coşkun, A. S., & Narin, M. (2025),Afet Yönetimi Ve Ekonomik Etkileri. Bölgesel Kalkınma Dergisi, 3(01), 49-66.
  17. Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., & Webb, J. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change, 18(4), 598-606.
  18. Cutter, S. L., Mitchell, J. T., & Scott, M. S. (2000). Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: A case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Annals of the association of American Geographers, 90(4), 713-737.
  19. Dodgson, M., Gann, D. M., & Salter, A. (Eds.). (2008). The management of technological innovation: Strategy and practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  20. European Commission. (2017). Guidelines on EU funding for the tourism sector: Implementation of the tourism strand of the ERDF and CF. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
  21. European Commission. (2020). European Innovation Scoreboard. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
  22. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (Eds.). (2005). The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  23. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2017). National preparedness report. Washington, DC: FEMA.
  24. Fire and Disaster Management Agency, Japan. Disaster Management in Japan. Accessed online: https://www.fdma.go.jp/en/countermeasures_and_measures/disaster_management_in_japan.html
  25. Güler, H. G., Özer Sözdinler, C., Arıkawa, T., Yalçıner, A. C. (2018). Tsunami Afeti Sonrası Yapısal ve Sosyal Planlama, Yapılanma Aşamaları ve Farkındalık: Japonya Örneği. Teknik Dergi, 29(5), 8605-8630.
  26. Güven, A., & Kızılkaya, S. B. (2023). Afetlerde yerel yönetimlerin etkinliği üzerine bir değerlendirme. Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2), 1-20.
  27. Haigh, R., & Amaratunga, D. (2010). An integrative review of the built environment discipline's role in the development of society's resilience to disasters. International journal of disaster resilience in the built environment, 1(1), 11-24.
  28. Hao, H., & Wang, Y. (2021). Assessing disaster impact in real time: Data-driven system integrating humans, hazards, and the built environment. Journal of computing in civil engineering, 35(5), 04021010.
  29. Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum. (2024.). Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum. Retrieved from http://www.pcf.city.hiroshima.jp/top_e.html
  30. Hook, G. D., Gilson, J., Hughes, C. W., & Dobson, H. (2011). Japan's international relations: politics, economics and security. Routledge.
  31. Hewitt, K. (Ed.). (2019). Interpretations of calamity: From the viewpoint of human ecology. Routledge.
  32. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. (2018). World disasters report 2018: Leaving no one behind. Geneva, Switzerland: IFRC.
  33. İrdem, İ., & Mert, E. (2023). Deprem, dirençli kent ve acil afet yönetimi: Türkiye örneği. Kamu Yönetimi ve Politikaları Dergisi, 4(2), 241-276.
  34. Japan Government. (2024). Emergency response plans. Retrieved from [https://www.japan.go.jp]
  35. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). (2023). Japan's Role in International Disaster Relief Efforts. Retrieved from https://www.jica.go.jp/english/index.html
  36. Japan Meteorological Agency. Earthquake early warning. Retrieved June 30, 2024, from https://www.jma.go.jp/jma/en/Activities/eew_history.html
  37. Japan Meteorological Agency. History of earthquakes. Retrieved June 30, 2024, from https://www.jma.go.jp/jma/en/Activities/eew_history.html
  38. Japan Meteorological Agency. Japan Meteorological Agency. Retrieved from https://www.jma.go.jp/jma/indexe.html
  39. Japan Meteorological Agency. Tsunami Warning and Mitigation Systems. Accessed online: https://www.jma.go.jp/jma/indexe.html
  40. Japan Times. (2011, March 12). Massive quake rocks northeast Japan. Retrieved from https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2011/03/12/national/massive-quake-rocks-northeast-japan/
  41. Japan Times. (2023). Japan Launches New Campaign to Raise Awareness about Earthquake Preparedness. Retrieved from https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2023/03/15/national/earthquake-preparedness-campaign-japan/
  42. Küçükyağcı, T. (2024). Afetle mücadelede yerel yönetimlerin rolü ve etkisi: Japonya-Türkiye karşılaştırması. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 14(Türkiye-Japonya İlişkileri 100. Yıl Özel Sayısı), 237-255.
  43. Lindell, M. K., Perry, R. W., Prater, C., & Nicholson, W. C. (2006). Fundamentals of emergency management (p. 485). Washington, DC, USA: FEMA.34.
  44. Lundvall, B. Å. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London, UK: Pinter Publishers.
  45. Malalgoda, C., Amaratunga, D., & Haigh, R. (2013). Creating a disaster resilient built environment in urban cities: The role of local governments in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 4(1), 72-94.
  46. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan. Disaster Preparedness in Schools. Accessed online: https://www.mext.go.jp/en/policy/education/elsec/title02/detail02/sdetail02/sdetail02/1386097.htm
  47. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japan. (2023). Annual Report on International Trade 2023. Retrieved from https://www.meti.go.jp/english/
  48. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2022). Japan's Contributions to Global Disaster Management. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/humanitarian/disaster/index.html
  49. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2023). Japan's Diplomatic Bluebook 2023. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/other/bluebook/index.html
  50. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (2023). Technological Innovations in Disaster Management. Retrieved from https://www.soumu.go.jp/english/index.html
  51. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Japan. Flood Control Measures in Japan. Accessed online: https://www.mlit.go.jp/river/basic_knowledge/english/flood_control_measures.html
  52. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Japan. Landslide Countermeasures in Japan. Accessed online: https://www.mlit.go.jp/sogoseisaku/region/landslide_measures_e.html
  53. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (İçişleri ve İletişim Bakanlığı). Ana web sitesi: https://www.soumu.go.jp/
  54. National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan. Community-Based Disaster Risk Management. Accessed online: https://www.nies.go.jp/social-e/cbdrm/
  55. National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience. (2022). Disaster Education in Japan. Retrieved from https://www.bosai.go.jp/en/
  56. NATO. (2015). Framework for Resilience of Allied Nations. Brussels, Belgium: NATO.
  57. NHK Research Center. (2023). The role of mobile technologies and social media in disaster management: Case study from Japan. Tokyo, Japan.
  58. Nuclear Regulation Authority. (2020). Overview of nuclear safety regulations in Japan. Retrieved June 30, 2024, from https://www.nsr.go.jp/english/what/index.html
  59. Nuclear Safety Commission of Japan. (2012). The official report of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission. Retrieved from http://www.nsr.go.jp/archive/nsc/senmon/shidai/genpatsu/teigen/120720/120720.pdf
  60. OECD. (2019). OECD Economic Surveys: Japan. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
  61. Oktay, S., Taş, N., & Taş, M. (2020). Kültürel miras alanlarının korunması ve afet yönetimi ilişkisi. Resilience, 4(2), 305-321.
  62. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2020). Disaster Risk Management in Japan. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
  63. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023). OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy: Japan 2023. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
  64. Orhan, E. (2018). Tarihi kent merkezlerinin kırılganlığı ve afet yönetimi üzerine bir değerlendirme: Ankara Saraçlar sokağı yangını örneği. İdealKent, 9(23), 189-215.
  65. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  66. Ölmez, M., & Bayrak, B. (2025). Doğal Afetler Sonrası Sürdürülebilir Bir Akıllı Kent Planlamasında Yerel Yönetişimin Rolü: Tokyo Kent Örneği Ve Malatya’nın Akıllı Kent Planlamasına Öneriler. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal Ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 27(48), 185-209.
  67. Özcan, N. S., Erdin, H. E., & Zengin, H. (2013). Kentlerde açık ve yeşil alan sistemlerinin afet yönetimi bağlamında kullanılabilirliğinin değerlendirilmesinde coğrafi bilgi sistemleri (CBS): İzmir örneği. TMMOB Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Kongresi, 11-13.
  68. Ölmez, M. (2025). Yerel Sürdürülebilirlikte Dijital İkiz Teknolojisi ve Doğal Afetleri Önlemede Etkisi: Japonya Örneği. İşletme, 6(1), 103-127.
  69. Parliament of Japan. (2013). Act on the Promotion of Disaster Risk Reduction Education. Retrieved from http://www.shugiin.go.jp/internet/itdb_housei.nsf/html/houritsu/18120120731069.htm
  70. Parliament of Japan. (2023). Annual Report on Japan's Official Development Assistance. Retrieved from http://www.shugiin.go.jp/index.nsf/html/index_e.htm
  71. Partigöç, N. S., & Tarhan, Ç. (2021). Risk Yönetimi Perspektifinden Bakış: Salgınların Kent Planlama Süreçlerine Etkileri. Resilience, 5(2), 295-308.
  72. Pelling, M. (2012). The vulnerability of cities: natural disasters and social resilience. Routledge.
  73. Pelling, M., & Dill, K. (Eds.). (2010). Natural disaster and development in a globalizing world. London, UK: Routledge.
  74. Rezvani, S. M., Falcão, M. J., Komljenovic, D., & de Almeida, N. M. (2023). A systematic literature review on urban resilience enabled with asset and disaster risk management approaches and GIS-based decision support tools. Applied Sciences, 13(4), 2223.
  75. Quarantelli, E. L. (Ed.). (1998). What is a disaster?: perspectives on the question. Psychology Press.
  76. Regional Promotion Bureau, Japan. (2023). Regional Innovation Strategies. Retrieved from https://www.mlit.go.jp/en/index.html
  77. Renn, O. (2008). Risk governance: Coping with uncertainty in a complex world. London, UK: Earthscan.
  78. Rosenau, J. N., & Czempiel, E. O. (Eds.). (1992). Governance without government: Order and change in world politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  79. Shaw, R., Shiwaku, K., & Izumi, T. (Eds.). (2017). Science and technology in disaster risk reduction in Asia: Potentials and challenges.
  80. Sawada, Y. (2013). Natural disaster management in Japan. Tokyo, Japan: Springer.
  81. Shaw, R., & Takeuchi, Y. (Eds.). (2018). Earthquake and tsunami: Societal impacts and emergency responses. Springer.
  82. Tuğaç, Ç. (2024). Türkiye Kentlerinde İklim Değişikliğine Dirençliliğin Ve Afet Risk Yönetiminin Sağlanmasında Kentsel Ekosistem Hizmetleri. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim, 19(43), 341-392.
  83. Twigg, J. (2004). Disaster risk reduction: mitigation and preparedness in development and emergency programming. Overseas Development Institute (ODI).
  84. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2004). Reducing Disaster Risk: A Challenge for Development. New York, NY: UNDP.
  85. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR). (2019). Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction. Geneva, Switzerland: UNDRR.
  86. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR). (2022). Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. Geneva, Switzerland: UNDRR.
  87. United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA). (2022). Space-based Technologies for Disaster Management. Vienna, Austria: UNOOSA.
  88. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2021). Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Responses to Natural Disasters. Vienna, Austria: UNODC.
  89. United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO). (2023). Tourism and Natural Disasters: Reducing Vulnerability and Building Resilience. Madrid, Spain: UNWTO.
  90. United States Agency for International Development (USAID). (2016). Disaster Risk Reduction: A Development Perspective. Washington, DC: USAID.
  91. United States Geological Survey (USGS). (2020). Earthquake Hazards Program. Retrieved from https://earthquake.usgs.gov/
  92. World Bank. (2017). World development report 2017: Governance and the law. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  93. World Bank. (2020). World development report 2020: Trading for development in the age of global value chains. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  94. World Bank. (2023). World development report 2023: Building a Resilient Future. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  95. World Tourism Organization (WTO). (2023). International Recommendations for Tourism Statistics 2023. Madrid, Spain: WTO.
  96. World Trade Organization (WTO). (2020). World Trade Report 2020: Government Policies and International Supply Chains. Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.
  97. Yeşildal, A. (2020). Doğal Afetlerle Mücadelede Yerel Yönetimlerin Rolü Ve Kapasite Sorunları: Esnek Şehir Uygulaması. Fırat Üniversitesi Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 4(1), 87-116.