SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kent Akademisi / 2026 / Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2

Crowd Management Strategies in Mass Events: Theoretical and Practical Approaches

Kitlesel Etkinliklerde Kalabalık Yönetimi Stratejileri: Teorik ve Pratik Yaklaşımlar

Saffet Karayaman(ARTVİN ÇORUH ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5624-4678
Seçkin Yıldız0000-0002-0717-3866
Pages
1–17
Publication Date
2026-03-02
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the future, the integration of data analytics and artificial intelligence systems is expected to enhance the effectiveness of crowd management strategies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Today, crowd management has become an important field of study within security management sciences.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Effective crowd management strategies are essential for large-scale events, demonstrations, sporting competitions, and crisis situations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the future, the integration of data analytics and artificial intelligence systems is expected to enhance the effectiveness of crowd management strategies.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kalabalık Yönetimi · Güvenlik Stratejileri · Kalabalık Yönetimi Stratejileri

Abstract

Today, crowd management has become an important field of study within security management sciences. Effective crowd management strategies are essential for large-scale events, demonstrations, sporting competitions, and crisis situations. This article examines both theoretical frameworks and practical strategies developed for crowd management, supported by real-world examples. In terms of methodology, the study is based on a qualitative review and descriptive case study analysis of crowd management incidents. Academic studies, policy documents, and official reports were analyzed to identify common patterns, theoretical frameworks, and best practices in managing large gatherings. The study consists of the following sections: the concept and characteristics of crowds, crowd management strategies, misconduct of officials and examples of correct practices, international examples, and the conclusion. Key topics such as crowd psychology, risk management, technological tools, and the role of law enforcement are also discussed. With a particular focus on official misconduct, the study provides essential suggestions on proper approaches to crowd management. Identified forms of misconduct include: excessive use of force, misinformation or lack of communication, absence of preventive dialogue, aggressive or provocative behavior, unplanned or uncoordinated interventions, inadequate response, and blocking of escape routes. Examples from several countries illustrate how poor intervention can lead to loss of control in crowd situations. The study emphasizes that proper training of security forces and conscious decision-making during crises are crucial to preventing potential chaos. It further suggests that professionals responsible for crowd management should receive formal Crowd Management Training. In the future, the integration of data analytics and artificial intelligence systems is expected to enhance the effectiveness of crowd management strategies.

Özet

Günümüzde kalabalık yönetimi, güvenlik yönetimi bilimleri kapsamında önemli bir çalışma alanı hâline gelmiştir. Kalabalık yönetimi stratejileri; büyük ölçekli etkinlikler, gösteriler, spor müsabakaları ve kriz durumlarında kamu güvenliğini korumak açısından kritik öneme sahiptir. Bu çalışma, kalabalık yönetimi için geliştirilen kuramsal çerçeveleri ve pratik stratejileri gerçek olay örnekleriyle birlikte incelemektedir. Yöntem bakımından çalışma, kalabalık yönetimi olaylarına ilişkin nitel bir derleme ve betimsel örnek olay analizine dayanmaktadır. Akademik çalışmalar, politika belgeleri ve resmî raporlar incelenerek geniş katılımlı toplulukların yönetiminde ortak örüntüler, kuramsal yaklaşımlar ve iyi uygulama örnekleri belirlenmiştir. Çalışma; kalabalık kavramı ve özellikleri, kalabalık yönetimi stratejileri, yetkililerin hatalı davranışları ve doğru uygulama örnekleri, dünyadan vaka örnekleri ve sonuç bölümlerinden oluşmaktadır. Ayrıca çalışma kapsamında kalabalık psikolojisi, risk yönetimi, teknolojik araçların rolü ve kolluk kuvvetlerinin işlevi tartışılmıştır. Yetkililerin hatalı müdahalelerine odaklanarak, kalabalık yönetiminde doğru yaklaşımlara ilişkin temel öneriler sunulmuştur. Hatalı uygulama biçimleri; aşırı güç kullanımı, yanlış yönlendirme veya iletişim eksikliği, önleyici diyalog kurmama, saldırgan ya da provokatif davranışlar, plansız ve koordinasyonsuz müdahaleler, yetersiz tepkiler ve kaçış yollarının engellenmesi olarak sınıflandırılmıştır. Çeşitli ülkelerden verilen örnekler, hatalı müdahalelerin kalabalıkların kontrolden çıkmasına nasıl yol açabileceğini göstermektedir. Araştırma, güvenlik güçlerinin uygun şekilde eğitilmesinin ve kriz anlarında bilinçli hareket etmesinin olası kaosları önlemede kritik rol oynadığını vurgulamaktadır. Ayrıca, kalabalık yönetiminden sorumlu profesyonellerin “Kalabalık Yönetimi Eğitimi” almalarının gerekliliği önerilmiştir. Gelecekte veri analitiği ve yapay zekâ destekli sistemlerin kullanımıyla kalabalık yönetimi stratejilerinin daha da gelişmesi beklenmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karayaman, S., Yıldız, S. (2026). Crowd Management Strategies in Mass Events: Theoretical and Practical Approaches. Kent Akademisi, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1705865

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (54)

  1. Adang, O. M. J. (2020). Policing Public Disorder: Theory and Practice. Eleven International Publishing.
  2. Adang, O., & Cuvelier, C. (2001). Policing European Football: Experiences from Peer Review Evaluation. European Commission.
  3. Alasmari, A. M., Farooqi, N. S., & Alotaibi, Y. A. (2024). Recent trends in crowd management using deep learning techniques: A systematic literature review. Journal of Umm Al-Qura University – Engineering and Architecture, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43995-024-00071-3
  4. Anadolu Ajansı. (2021, Ekim 25). ABD’de başkanlık seçimi kaosa yol açabilir. AA. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/abd-baskanlik-secimleri-2020/abdde-baskanlik-secimi-kaosa-yol-acabilir/1977525
  5. Associated Press. (Haziran 2, 2020). George Floyd protests: The impact of police brutality and racial injustice. AP News. https://www.ap.org/en-us/press-releases/2020/george-floyd-protests-impact
  6. BBC Turkish. (July 24, 2010). Love Parade: A stampede in Duisburg has killed 21 people. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler/2010/07/100724_loveparade
  7. BBC Turkish. (September 24, 2015). Mina stampede: More than 700 killed during Hajj. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler/2015/09/150924_hac_mina
  8. Blumer, H. (1939). Collective behavior. In R. E. Park (Ed.), An outline of the principles of sociology (pp. 221–280). Barnes & Noble.
  9. Borch, C. (2013). Crowd theory and the management of crowds: A controversial relationship. Current Sociology, 61, 584-601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113486443
  10. Brewer, J., & Wollman, H. (2011). Sociological Perspectives on the 2011 UK Riots: Complexity and Irrationality in Crowd Behavior. Sociology Review, 45(2), 203-217.
  11. Brindal, E., Kakoschke, N., Reeson, A., & Evans, D. (2022). Madness of the crowd: Understanding mass behaviors through a multidisciplinary lens. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 924511. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.924511
  12. Britannica. (2025). Hillsborough disaster. Encyclopædia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/event/Hillsborough-disaster
  13. Carlson, N. R. (2013). Physiology of Behavior (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  14. Cooper, C., & Innes, M. (2009). The impact of public order policing on crowd dynamics. Policing & Society, 19(2), 115-135.
  15. Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2000). Collective action and psychological change: The emergence of new social identities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 579–604. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164642
  16. Drury, J., Reicher, S., & Stott, C. (2003). Transforming the boundaries of collective identity: From the ‘local’ anti-road campaign to ‘global’ resistance? Social Movement Studies, 2(2), 191-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/1474283032000139779
  17. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
  18. Fourati, J., Issaoui, B. and Zidi, K. (2017). Literature Review of Crowd Management: A Hajj Case Study. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 1: ICINCO; ISBN 978-989-758-263-9; ISSN 2184-2809, SciTePress, pages 346-351. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006472103460351
  19. Fruin, J. J. (1993). The causes and prevention of crowd disasters. Engineering for Crowd Safety, 99- 108.
  20. Görer Tamer, N. (2021). Sustainable Urban Management: The Relationship Between Spatial Planning and Water Management. Kent Akademisi Dergisi, 18(2), 860–877.
  21. Ha, K. (2024). Crowd stampede management at sporting events: a systematic literature review. Movement & Sport Sciences - Science & Motricité. https://doi.org/10.1051/sm/2024009
  22. Haghani, M., Coughlan, M., Crabb, B., Dierickx, A., Feliciani, C., van Gelder, R., … Wilson, A. (2023). A roadmap for the future of crowd safety research and practice: Introducing the Swiss Cheese Model of Crowd Safety and the imperative of a Vision Zero target. Safety Science, 168, 106292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106292
  23. Helbing, D., & Johansson, A. (2011). Pedestrian, crowd, and evacuation dynamics. Transportation Science, 45(2), 138-156.
  24. Helbing, D., & Mukerji, P. (2012). Crowd disasters as systemic failures: Analysis of the Love Parade disaster. Safety Science, 50(4), 1041-1050.
  25. Hoggett J, Stott C (2010), "Crowd psychology, public order police training and the policing of football crowds". Policing: An International Journal, Vol. 33 No. 2 pp. 218–235. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639511011044858
  26. Kalat, J. W. (2017). Biological Psychology (13th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
  27. Kara, B., & Çamur, Ö. (2024). Public security: An evaluation from the perspective of crowd management. Cihanşümul Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(9), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.62356/cihansumul.1576310
  28. Kara, F. S., & Yıldırım, G. Ö. (2023). A literature review on stampedes occurring in sporting events (football). Afet ve Risk Dergisi, 6(3), 1115–1130.
  29. Karayaman, S. (2022). Crowd management and the situation in schools. In A. Yazar (Eds. Çiftçi, H & Yıldız, S.), Selected topics in social sciences - 6 (pp. 257-273). Iksad Publishing.
  30. Kesici, N. (2021). İstanbul İstiklal Caddesi’nde kalabalık odaklı kamusal mekan yaklaşımı: Çok sayıda insan, aynı zamanda aynı mekânda. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, ODTÜ.
  31. Kılıç, C. (2024). Sürdürülebilir İnsani Kalkınma ve Sürdürülebilir Kentlerin İnşasında İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi Stratejileri. Kent Akademisi Dergisi, 17(Sürdürülebilir İnsani Kalkınma ve Kent), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1501835.
  32. Le Bon, G. (2001). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. Dover Publications.
  33. Marsden, A. W. (1998). Training railway operating staff to understand and manage passenger and crowd behaviour. Industrial and Commercial Training, 30(5), 171-175.
  34. Marsden, G. (2013). Understanding Passenger Behavior: Implications for Crowd Management Training. Transportation Safety Journal, 8(4), 289-305.
  35. McPhail, C. (1991). The myth of the madding crowd. Aldine de Gruyter.
  36. Ministry of Interior. (2020, May 1). Statement by Ministry of Interior spokesperson Çataklı. https://www.icisleri.gov.tr/icisleri-bakanligi-sozcusu-cataklidan-1-mayis-aciklamasi
  37. Reicher, S. (2001). The psychology of crowd dynamics. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 182-208). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470998458.ch8
  38. Reicher, S., Stott, C., Cronin, P., & Adang, O. (2004). An integrated approach to crowd psychology and public order policing. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 27(4), 558-572. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510410566271
  39. Reicher, S., Stott, C., Cronin, P., & Adang, O. (2007). An integrated approach to crowd psychology and public order policing. Policing, 1(4), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pam053
  40. Richards, K. (2017). Protest escalation: A comparative case study exploring tools for police for successful protest engagement (Master’s thesis). Concordia University Portland. http://commons.cu-portland.edu/gradproj/51
  41. Sa'ad, A., Fourati, H., & Brindal, E. (2023). The Role of Technology in Crowd Monitoring and Disaster Prevention. International Journal of Public Security, 15(1), 45-67.
  42. Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  43. Shek D. T. L. (2020). Protests in Hong Kong (2019-2020): a Perspective Based on Quality of Life and Well-Being. Applied research in quality of life, 15(3), 619–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-020-09825-2
  44. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  45. Still, G. K. (2014). Introduction to crowd science. CRC Press.
  46. Stott, C., & Reicher, S. (2016). Policing the coronavirus pandemic: Challenges of legitimacy. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 14(3), 580–593. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paaa026
  47. Stott, C., Scothern, M., & Gorringe, H. (2011). Advances in liaison-based public order policing in England: Human rights and negotiating the management of protest. Policing, 5(4), 388–395. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/par041
  48. Tinbergen, N. (1951). The study of instinct. Oxford University Press.
  49. Turner, R. H., & Killian, L. M. (1957). Collective behavior. Prentice-Hall.
  50. Türk Dil Kurumu. (2022). Kalabalık. In Türkçe Sözlük. https://sozluk.gov.tr
  51. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti İçişleri Bakanlığı. (2022, Ekim 18). Kalabalıkların yönetimine ilişkin yöntemler ve standartlar: “Türkiye Eylem Modeli” standartları/ilkeleri [PDF]. https://www.icisleri.gov.tr/kurumlar/icisleri.gov.tr/IcSite/mulkiyeteftis/basili_yayinlar/110_TURKCE.pdf
  52. VOA Turkish. (2023, Ocak 18). Police brutality protests across the U.S. Voice of America. https://www.voaturkce.com/a/abd-nin-dort-bir-yaninda-polis-siddeti-protestolari/6937798.html
  53. Waddington, D. P. (2007). Policing public disorder: Theory and practice. Willan. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843926535
  54. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.