SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Afet ve Risk Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 22

Architecture Education Under Seismic Challenge: A Critical Curriculum Analysis in Türkiye

Fazıl Akdağ(ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MİMARLIK FAKÜLTESİ, MİMARLIK BÖLÜMÜ, BİNA BİLGİSİ ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0002-3316-8104
Figen Beyhan(GAZI UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-4287-1037
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-22
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, it is considered necessary and recommended to strengthen the number and quality of earthquake-focused content in architectural education, update it pedagogically, and integrate it into the core of design education.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study evaluates the position and quality of earthquake-resistant design in architecture undergraduate programs in Türkiye through a comparative analysis of the 2022 and 2025 course syllabi.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim is to reveal the reflection of the February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş earthquakes on the curricula through quantitative and qualitative findings.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, it is considered necessary and recommended to strengthen the number and quality of earthquake-focused content in architectural education, update it pedagogically, and integrate it into the core of design education.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Architecture Curriculum · Architectural Education · Curriculum Analysis

Abstract

This study evaluates the position and quality of earthquake-resistant design in architecture undergraduate programs in Türkiye through a comparative analysis of the 2022 and 2025 course syllabi. The aim is to reveal the reflection of the February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş earthquakes on the curricula through quantitative and qualitative findings. Data compiled from YÖK Atlas and university course catalogs show no change in the number of compulsory courses, while a limited increase is observed in elective courses. Most of the course content remains engineering-based and theoretical, with a weak integration with architectural design studios and practical courses. To delve deeper into these findings, semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine experts who have research experience and teaching experience in this field. Common recommendations were obtained regarding the integration of earthquake knowledge into studio processes, increasing interdisciplinary collaborations, and the use of current pedagogical tools. Based on the findings, a curriculum consisting of 2 hours of theory and 2 hours of practice is proposed, including regulations, structural configuration, ground-structure interaction, and damage analysis, as well as a mandatory "Earthquake-Resistant Architectural Design" course. In conclusion, it is considered necessary and recommended to strengthen the number and quality of earthquake-focused content in architectural education, update it pedagogically, and integrate it into the core of design education.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’deki mimarlık lisans programlarında depreme dayanıklı tasarımın konumunu ve niteliğini, 2022 ve 2025 ders planlarının karşılaştırmalı analiziyle değerlendirmektedir. Amaç, 6 Şubat 2023 Kahramanmaraş depremlerinin müfredatlara yansımasını nicel ve nitel bulgularla ortaya koymaktır. YÖK Atlas ve üniversite ders kataloglarından derlenen veriler, zorunlu ders sayısında bir değişim olmadığını, seçmeli derslerde ise sınırlı bir artış görüldüğünü göstermektedir. Ders içeriklerinin çoğu mühendislik temelli ve kuramsal kalmakta, mimari tasarım stüdyoları ile uygulamalı derslerle bütünleşme zayıf görünmektedir. Bu tespitleri derinleştirmek üzere konuya ilişkin araştırmaları ve ders yürütme deneyimi bulunan dokuz uzmanla yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yapılmış, deprem bilgisinin stüdyo süreçlerine yerleştirilmesi, disiplinlerarası iş birliklerinin artırılması ve güncel pedagojik araçların kullanılması yönünde ortak öneriler elde edilmiştir. Bulgular doğrultusunda, 2 saat kuram ve 2 saat uygulamadan oluşan, yönetmelik, yapı konfigürasyonu, zemin-yapı etkileşimi ve hasar analizinin yanı sıra zorunlu bir “Depreme Dayanıklı Mimari Tasarım” dersi önerilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, mimarlık eğitiminde deprem odaklı içeriğin sayı ve nitelik bakımından güçlendirilmesi, pedagojik olarak güncellenmesi ve tasarım eğitiminin çekirdeğine yerleştirilmesi gerekli görülmekte ve önerilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akdağ, F., Beyhan, F. (2026). Architecture Education Under Seismic Challenge: A Critical Curriculum Analysis in Türkiye. Afet ve Risk Dergisi, Sayı: 22. https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.1821346

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. AFAD Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı, (2019). Türkiye Deprem Tehlike Haritası. Available at: https://www.afad.gov.tr/Türkiye -deprem-tehlike-haritasi (Last accessed: March 7, 2025).
  2. AFAD Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı, (2022). Bütünleşik Afet Yönetim Sistemi. Available at: https://www.afad.gov.tr/butunlesik-afet-yonetim-sistemi (Last accessed: August 11, 2025).
  3. Akdağ, F., Beyhan, F. (2024). Bir Deprem Ülkesinde Mimarlık Eğitim Sürecinin İrdelenmesi. Online Journal of Art and Design, 12(1), 88-103.
  4. Aktuna, B., Köylüoğlu Ö. (2024). Pushing the Boundaries of Architectural and Engineering Education: A Case Study Analysis of the Experience, Outcomes, and Challenges of an Interdisciplinary and Collaborative Design Studio. Journal of Mediterranean Cities, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.38027/mediterranean-cities_vol4no1_1
  5. Arabacıoğlu, F.P., Er İ.E., Taştan, H. (2025). The investigation into the relationship between seismic design and architectural education: a systematic literature review. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2025.2458798
  6. Arefi, M., and Hadian, A. (2013). The utility of structural engineering concepts in architectural thinking: The Iranian experience. ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 7(1), 99–115.
  7. Ayyıldız Potur, A., Metin, H. (2021). Mimarlık Eğitiminde Depremin Yeri ve Depremin Eğitsel Boyutu: Küresel Gündem ve Türkiye Bağlamı Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme. Megaron, 16 (2), 223-254.
  8. Bodur, A. (2023). The role of disaster management in architectural education in Türkiye. In EJER Congress 2023 International Eurasian Educational Research Congress Conference Proceedings (pp. 292–307). Anı Publishing.
  9. Charleson, A. (2005). Structure As Architecture (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080457130.
  10. Charleson, A. (2008). Seismic Design for Architects: Outwitting the Quake. Oxford: Architectural Press.
  11. Charleson, A. (2018). Earthquake Engineering Education in Schools of Architecture: Developments during the Last Ten Years Including Rule-of-Thumb Software. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ae.1943-5568.0000324
  12. Charleson, A. (2012). Seismic Design for Architects. London: Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080888255.
  13. Charleson, A. (1997). Seismic design within architectural education. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 30(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.30.1.46-50
  14. Dereci, Ş., Ertaş Beşir, Ş. (2023). The relationship between earthquake and non-structural elements in departments of architecture and interior architecture in educational programs. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Architectural Sciences and Applications Symposium (IArcSAS-2022) (pp. 1172–1185). Baku, Azerbaijan: IArcSAS.
  15. Forino, G., Von Meding, J., and Brewer, G. J. (2015). A conceptual governance framework for climate change adaptation and disaster Risk Reduction integration. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 6(4), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-015-0076-z
  16. Morales-Beltran, M., Yildiz, B. (2020). Integrating configuration-based seismic design principles into architectural education: teaching strategies for lecture courses. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 16(4), 310–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2020.1738995
  17. Morales-Beltran, M., Charleson, A., Aydin, E. E. (2020). Sawtooth method for teaching seismic design principles to architecture students. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 26(1).
  18. Özdoğan, F., Güney, D. (2016). The importance of architecture education for disaster mitigation. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 204, 373-384. https://doi.org/10.2495/SC160321
  19. Özmen, C. (2013). Increasing Social Awareness and Professional Collaboration in Architectural Education Towards a Sustainable and Disaster-Free Future. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science, 1(4), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.14486/IJSCS35
  20. Shaw, R., Sakurai, A., and Oikawa, Y. (2021). New realization of disaster risk reduction education in the context of a global pandemic: Lessons from Japan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 12, 568–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-021-00337-7
  21. Soyluk, A., Harmankaya, Z.Y. (2012). Examination of earthquake resistant design in the education of architecture. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 1080–1086.
  22. T.C. Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı, (2023). Kahramanmaraş ve Hatay Depremleri Raporu. Available at https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/2023-Kahramanmaras-ve-Hatay-Depremleri-Raporu.pdf (Last accessed: March 30, 2025).