SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2

Biosimulation in Architecture: An AI-Supported Approach to Living Architectural Systems

Fazıl Akdağ(ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MİMARLIK FAKÜLTESİ, MİMARLIK BÖLÜMÜ, BİNA BİLGİSİ ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0002-3316-8104
Pages
327–342
Publication Date
2026-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study contributes to the redefinition of the structure not merely as a form resembling nature, but as a system that responds like nature and can reorganize itself.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study goes beyond biophilic and biomimetic approaches that limit the relationship with nature in architecture to merely aesthetic or structural representations, presenting a new theoretical proposal that centers on the behavioral patterns of nature: Biosimulation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Supported by interdisciplinary theoretical foundations such as systems theory, autopoiesis, and evolutionary algorithms, this approach is based on the analysis of speculative prototypes developed with AI-supported visual production tools.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study contributes to the redefinition of the structure not merely as a form resembling nature, but as a system that responds like nature and can reorganize itself.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:AI-Supported Design · Behavioral Architecture · Biophilic and Biomimetic Design

Abstract

This study goes beyond biophilic and biomimetic approaches that limit the relationship with nature in architecture to merely aesthetic or structural representations, presenting a new theoretical proposal that centers on the behavioral patterns of nature: Biosimulation. Supported by interdisciplinary theoretical foundations such as systems theory, autopoiesis, and evolutionary algorithms, this approach is based on the analysis of speculative prototypes developed with AI-supported visual production tools. Prototypes developed within the study, such as Myco-Habitat, Photosynthetic Pavilion, and Coral Shelter, have been evaluated comparatively with structures selected from the real world, and the potential of biosimulation to produce behavioral intelligence, environmental adaptation, and organizational dynamism in architectural design has been questioned. The study contributes to the redefinition of the structure not merely as a form resembling nature, but as a system that responds like nature and can reorganize itself.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akdağ, F. (2026). Biosimulation in Architecture: An AI-Supported Approach to Living Architectural Systems. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2, 327–342. https://doi.org/10.18466/cbayarfbe.1696709

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (33)

  1. . Pawlyn, M. 2019. Biomimicry in architecture. RIBA Publishing.
  2. . Kellert, S. R., Heerwagen, J., & Mador, M. 2008. (Eds.). Biophilic design: The theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life. Wiley.
  3. . Benyus, J. M. 2002. Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. Harper Perennial.
  4. . Vincent, J. F. V., Bogatyreva, O. A., Bogatyrev, N. R., Bowyer, A., & Pahl, A. K. 2006. Biomimetics: Its practice and theory. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 3(9), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2006.0127.
  5. . Zari, M. P. 2007. Biomimetic approaches to architectural design for increased sustainability. SB07 New Zealand Conference.
  6. . Hensel, M. Performance-oriented architecture: Rethinking architectural design and the built environment. Wiley, (2013).
  7. . Oxman, N. 2010. Material-based design computation. MIT Journal of Design and Computation, 1(1), 1–20.
  8. . Wilson, E. O. 1984. Biophilia. Harvard University Press.
  9. . Grinde, B., & Patil, G. G. 2009. Biophilia: Does visual contact with nature impact on health and well-being? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 6(9), 2332–2343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph6092332.
  10. . Browning, W. D., Ryan, C. O., & Clancy, J. O. 2014. 14 patterns of biophilic design: Improving health and well-being in the built environment. Terrapin Bright Green. https://www.terrapinbrightgreen.com/reports/14-patterns/.
  11. . Zhong, W., Schröder, T., & Bekkering, J. 2022. Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: A critical review. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(1), 114-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.006.
  12. . Salingaros, N. A. 2015. Biophilia and Healing Environments: Healthy Principles for Designing the Built World. Terrapin Bright Green.
  13. . Arslan, S., & Sorguç, A. G. 2004. Similarities between “structures in nature” and “man-made structures”: Biomimesis in architecture. In M. W. Collins & C. A. Brebbia (Eds.), Design and Nature. pp. 45–54. WIT Press. https://www.witpress.com/elibrary/dne-volumes/2/1/280.
  14. . Pearce, D. 2008. Eastgate Centre: Climate control the natural way. The Guardian.
  15. . Bitar, A. L. B., Bergmans, I., & Ritzen, M. 2022. Circular, biomimicry‑based, and energy‑efficient façade development for renovating terraced dwellings in the Netherlands. Journal of Facade Design & Engineering, 10(1), 75–83. http://doi.org/10.47982/jfde.2022.1.04.
  16. . Grimshaw Architects. 2001. EDEN Biome poster [Poster]. Retrieved April 18, 2025, from https://grimshaw.global/assets/lib/2016/10/12/EDEN_biome_poster_2001.jpg
  17. . Bertalanffy, L. V. 1968. General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. George Braziller.
  18. . Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. 1980. Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Reidel.
  19. . Frazer, J. H. 1995. An Evolutionary Architecture. Architectural Association.
  20. . Carpo, M. 2017. The Second Digital Turn: Design Beyond Intelligence. MIT Press.
  21. . As, I., Pal, S., & Basu, P. 2018. Artificial intelligence in architecture: Generating conceptual design via deep learning. International Journal of Architectural Computing. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478077118800982.
  22. . Spyropoulos, T. 2013. Adaptive Ecologies: Correlated Systems of Living. Architectural Association.
  23. . DeLanda, M. 2011. Philosophy and Simulation: The Emergence of Synthetic Reason. Continuum.
  24. . Groat, L., & Wang, D. 2013. Architectural Research Methods (2nd ed.). Wiley.
  25. . Troiani, I., & Ewing, S. (Eds.). 2021. Visual Research Methods in Architecture. Intellect.
  26. . Boeri, S. 2016. Urban Forestry: Bosco Verticale and the Future of Sustainable Cities. Stefano Boeri Architetti.
  27. . ArchDaily. (2015). Bosco Verticale / Stefano Boeri Architetti. Retrieved July 7, 2025, from https://www.archdaily.com/777498/bosco-verticale-stefano-boeri-architetti
  28. . Ho, C., Liu, C., & Chen, L. 2022. Prompt engineering and the aesthetics of AI-generated architectural form. Journal of Computational Design and Architecture, 5(1), 34–47.
  29. . Yaşar, İ., Arslan Selçuk, S., & Alaçam, S. 2025. Use of artificial intelligence and prompt literacy in architectural education. New Design Ideas, 9(1), 248–268. https://doi.org/10.62476/ndi.91.248.
  30. . Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press.
  31. . Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Duke University Press.
  32. . Li, C., Zhang, T., Du, X., Zhang, Y., & Xie, H. (2025). Generative AI models for different steps in architectural design: A literature review. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 14(3), 759-783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2024.10.001
  33. . Albukhari, I. N. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence (AI) in architectural design: a systematic review of emerging technologies and applications. Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Engineering and Architecture, 16(4), 1457–1476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43995-025-00186-1