SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Verimlilik Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 60 Sayı: 4

The Effect of Positive Psychological Capital on Job Performance: A Field Study on Academics

Pozitif Psikolojik Sermayenin İş Performansına Etkisi: Akademisyenler Üzerine Bir Alan Araştırması

Fatih Altun(BATMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5725-0770
Arzu Ekinci Demirelli(BATMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9229-8198
Pages
1233–1252
Publication Date
2026-10-21
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Originality: The originality of the study lies in examining the effect of positive psychological capital on job performance among academics following the February 6, 2023 earthquakes, addressing the effects of the sub-dimensions of optimism, psychological resilience, hope, and self-efficacy on job performance separately, and evaluating them in terms of professional productivity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: This study aims to examine the effect of academics’ perceptions of positive psychological capital and its subdimensions (optimism, hope, psychological resilience, and self-efficacy) on job performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methodology: Face-to-face and online surveys were administered to 245 academics working at Batman University.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Originality: The originality of the study lies in examining the effect of positive psychological capital on job performance among academics following the February 6, 2023 earthquakes, addressing the effects of the sub-dimensions of optimism, psychological resilience, hope, and self-efficacy on job performance separately, and evaluating them in terms of professional productivity.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Akademisyenler · İş Performansı · Pozitif Psikolojik Sermaye

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to examine the effect of academics’ perceptions of positive psychological capital and its subdimensions (optimism, hope, psychological resilience, and self-efficacy) on job performance. Methodology: Face-to-face and online surveys were administered to 245 academics working at Batman University. The validity of the scales was tested using confirmatory factor analysis, and their reliability was tested using Cronbach's Alpha. Relationships between variables were evaluated using Pearson correlation, and the effects were assessed using simple and multiple linear regression analyses. Findings: As a result of the Pearson correlation analysis, it was determined that there was a strong, positive, and significant relationship between positive psychological capital and job performance. When the subdimensions were examined, it was observed that the relationship between hope and self-efficacy and job performance was high, while the relationship with psychological resilience was moderate and with optimism was low. As a result of the simple linear regression analysis, it was determined that positive psychological capital had a positive and significant effect on job performance. In the multiple linear regression analysis, it was revealed that hope and psychological resilience had a significant effect on job performance, whereas optimism and self-efficacy did not have a significant effect. Originality: The originality of the study lies in examining the effect of positive psychological capital on job performance among academics following the February 6, 2023 earthquakes, addressing the effects of the sub-dimensions of optimism, psychological resilience, hope, and self-efficacy on job performance separately, and evaluating them in terms of professional productivity.

Özet

Amaç: Bu araştırma, akademisyenlerin pozitif psikolojik sermaye ve alt boyutlarına (iyimserlik, umut, psikolojik dayanıklılık ve öz-yeterlilik) yönelik algılarının iş performansı üzerindeki etkisini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Yöntem: Batman Üniversitesi’nde görev yapan 245 akademisyene yüz yüze ve çevrimiçi anketler uygulanmıştır. Ölçeklerin geçerliliği doğrulayıcı faktör analiziyle, güvenilirliği Cronbach’s Alpha ile test edilmiştir. Değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiler Pearson korelasyon, etkiler ise basit ve çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizleriyle değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Pearson korelasyon analizi sonucunda, pozitif psikolojik sermaye ile iş performansı arasında güçlü, pozitif yönlü ve anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu belirlenmiştir. Alt boyutlar incelendiğinde, umut ve öz-yeterlilik ile iş performansı arasındaki ilişkinin yüksek, psikolojik dayanıklılık ile orta ve iyimserlik ile düşük düzeyde olduğu görülmüştür. Basit doğrusal regresyon analizi sonucunda, pozitif psikolojik sermayenin iş performansı üzerinde pozitif yönde ve anlamlı bir etkisinin olduğu saptanmıştır. Çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizinde ise umut ve psikolojik dayanıklılığın iş performansı üzerinde anlamlı etkisinin olduğu, iyimserlik ve öz-yeterliliğin ise anlamlı bir etkisinin olmadığı ortaya konulmuştur. Özgünlük: Çalışmanın özgün yönü, pozitif psikolojik sermayenin iş performansı üzerindeki etkisinin 6 Şubat 2023 depremleri sonrasında akademisyenler örnekleminde incelenmesi, iyimserlik, psikolojik dayanıklılık, umut ve öz yeterlilik alt boyutlarının iş performansı üzerindeki etkilerinin ayrı ayrı ele alınması ve mesleki verimlilik açısından değerlendirilmesidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Altun, F., Demirelli, A. E. (2026). The Effect of Positive Psychological Capital on Job Performance: A Field Study on Academics. Verimlilik Dergisi, Cilt: 60 Sayı: 4, 1233–1252. https://doi.org/10.51551/verimlilik.1902328

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (84)

  1. Alpar, R. (2003). "Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistiksel Yöntemlere Giriş-1", (2. Baskı), Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
  2. Altun, F. (2023). “Akademisyenlerin pozitif psikolojik sermaye algıları ile iş performansları arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi”, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Batman Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, Batman.
  3. Anderson, J.C. ve Gerbing, D.W. (1984). “The Effect of Sampling Error on Convergence, Improper Solutions, and Goodness-of-Fit Indices for Maximum Likelihood Confirmatory Factor Analysis”, Psychometrika, 49(2), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294170
  4. Ateş, M., Turgut, H. ve Çelik, M. (2018). “Psikolojik Sermayenin İş Performansına Etkisinde Örgütsel Özdeşleşmenin Aracılık Rolü”, Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 17. UİK Özel Sayısı, 781-798. https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.437901
  5. Avey, J.B., Nimnicht, J.L. ve Pigeon, N.G. (2010). “Two Field Studies Examining the Association Between Positive Psychological Capital and Employee Performance”, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31(5), 384-401. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731011056425
  6. Avey, J.B., Reichard, R.J., Luthans, F. ve Mhatre, K.H. (2011). “Meta‐Analysis of the Impact of Positive Psychological Capital on Employee Attitudes, Behaviors, and Performance”, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(2), 127-152. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20070
  7. Avey, J.B., Wernsing, T.S. ve Luthans, F. (2008). “Can Positive Employees Help Positive Organizational Change? Impact of Psychological Capital and Emotions on Relevant Attitudes and Behaviors”, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44(1), 48-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886307311470
  8. Aydoğan, E. ve Uğurlu Kara, A. (2015). “Pozitif Psikolojik Sermaye ile Bireysel Performans İlişkisi: Türkiye Tarım Kredi Kooperatifi Merkez Birliği Örneği”, Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi, 50(1), 68-91.
  9. Bakker, A.B. ve Demerouti, E. (2007). “The Job Demands-Resources Model: State of the Art”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
  10. Bandura, A. (1977). “Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change”, Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  11. Bandura, A. (2008). “An Agentic Perspective on Positive Psychology”, Positive Psychology: Exploring the Best in People, (Editör: S. J. Lopez), Greenwood, Westport, CT, 167-196.
  12. Baumgartner, H. ve Homburg, C. (1996). “Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing and Consumer Research: A Review”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0
  13. Benard, B. (1993). “Fostering Resiliency in Kids”, Educational Leadership, 51(3), 44-48.
  14. Bentler, P.M. ve Bonett, D.G. (1980). “Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures”, Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  15. Bentler, P.M. (1990). “Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models”, Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
  16. Borman, W.C. ve Motowidlo, S.J. (1997). “Task Performance and Contextual Performance: The Meaning for Personnel Selection Research”, Human Performance, 10(2), 99-109. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_3
  17. Browne, M.W. ve Cudeck, R. (1993). “Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit”, Testing Structural Equation Models, 21(2), 230-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
  18. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). “Faktör Analizi: Temel Kavramlar ve Ölçek Geliştirmede Kullanımı”, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 32(32), 470-483.
  19. Campbell, J.P. (1990). “Modeling the Performance Prediction Problem in Industrial and Organizational Psychology”, Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, (Editörler: M.D. Dunnette ve L.M. Hough), 2. Baskı, Cilt 1, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA, 687-732.
  20. Campbell, J.P., McCloy, R.A., Oppler, S.H. ve Sager, C.E. (1993). “A Theory of Performance”, Personnel Selection in Organizations, (Editörler: N. Schmitt ve W.C. Borman), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 35-70.
  21. Cheung, G.W. ve Rensvold, R.B. (2002). “Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance”, Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
  22. Cohen, J. (1988). “Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences” (2nd ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
  23. Çavmak, D. ve Acar, F. (2020). “Pozitif Psikolojik Sermaye ile Performans Algısı Arasındaki İlişki: Sağlık Çalışanları Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 7(2), 203-212. https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.732944
  24. Çetin, F. ve Basım, H.N. (2012). “Örgütsel Psikolojik Sermaye: Bir Ölçek Uyarlama Çalışması”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 45(1), 121-137.
  25. Çöl, G. (2008). “Algılanan Güçlendirmenin İşgören Performansı Üzerine Etkileri”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 9(1), 35-46.
  26. Demirel, S. ve Özmen, M. (2020). “Pozitif Psikolojik Sermayenin İş Performansına Etkisi: Av Sanayi Çalışanları Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, İş’te Davranış Dergisi, 5(2), 55-63.
  27. Deva, S., Ejoke, U.P., Abraham, J. ve Madukwe, A.U. (2025). “Psychological Capital as a Catalyst: Unlocking Job Satisfaction, Embeddedness, and Performance Among International Faculty”, Cogent Education, 12(1), 2555739. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2555739
  28. Dönmez, B. (2014). “Pozitif Psikolojik Sermaye ile İşe İlişkin Duyuşsal İyilik Algısı, İş Doyumu, İşgören Performansı ve Yaşam Doyumu İlişkilerinin Seyahat Acentesi Çalışanları Örnekleminde İncelenmesi”, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Mersin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Mersin.
  29. Durbin, J. ve Watson, G.S. (1951). “Testing for Serial Correlation in Least Squares Regression”, Biometrika, 38(1-2), 159-177. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/38.1-2.159
  30. Envick, B.R. (2005). “Beyond Human and Social Capital: The Importance of Positive Psychological Capital for Entrepreneurial Success”, The Entrepreneurial Executive, 10, 41-52.
  31. Erkuş, A., ve Fındıklı, M.A. (2013). “Psikolojik Sermayenin İş Tatmini, İş Performansı ve İşten Ayrılma Niyeti Üzerindeki Etkisine Yönelik Bir Araştırma”, İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Dergisi, 42(2), 302-318.
  32. Field, A. (2018). “Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics” (5th ed.), Sage, London.
  33. Goldsmith, A.H., Darity Jr, W. ve Veum, J.R. (1998). “Race, Cognitive Skills, Psychological Capital and Wages”, The Review of Black Political Economy, 26(2), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714839.1998.11825457
  34. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B. J. ve Anderson, R. E. (2019). “Multivariate Data Analysis” (8th ed.), Cengage, Boston.
  35. Hobfoll, S.E. (2002). “Social and Psychological Resources and Adaptation”, Review of General Psychology, 6(4), 307-324. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.6.4.307
  36. Hu, L.T. ve Bentler, P.M. (1999). “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives”, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  37. Jia, L. ve Zhang, P. (2025). “The Impact of Psychological Capital on Job Performance Among Government Employees in China”, Scientific Reports, 15(1), 12752. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98045-5
  38. Kalemci Tüzün, İ., Çetin, F. ve Basım, H.N. (2018). “Improving Job Performance Through Identification and Psychological Capital”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(1), 155-170. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2016-0060
  39. Kappagoda, S., Othman, H.Z.F. ve Alwis, G.D. (2014). “Psychological Capital and Job Performance: The Mediating Role of Work Attitudes”, Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 2, 102-116. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhrss.2014.22009
  40. Karabacak Çelik, A. (2023). “Deprem Sonrası Travma Belirtileri, Umut ve İyi Oluş Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi”, TRT Akademi, 8(18), 574-591. https://doi.org/10.37679/trta.1275268
  41. Karasar, N. (2016). “Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi” (30. Baskı), Nobel Yayınları, Ankara.
  42. Kartol, A., Üztemur, S. ve Yaşar, P. (2023). “‘I Cannot See Ahead’: Psychological Distress, Doomscrolling and Dark Future among Adult Survivors Following Mw 7.7 and 7.6 Earthquakes in Türkiye”, BMC Public Health, 23, 2513. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17460-3
  43. Kirkman, B.L. ve Rosen, B. (1999). “Beyond Self-Management: Antecedents and Consequences of Team Empowerment”, Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 58-74. https://doi.org/10.5465/256874
  44. Kline, R.B. (2011). “Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling”, Guilford Press, New York.
  45. Kline, R.B. (2016). “Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling” (4th ed.), Guilford Press, New York.
  46. Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., Schaufeli, W. B., de Vet, H. C. W. ve van der Beek, A. J. (2011). “Conceptual Frameworks of Individual Work Performance: A Systematic Review”, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53(8), 856-866. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e318226a763
  47. Korkmazer, F., Ekingen, E. ve Yıldız, A. (2016). “Psikolojik Sermayenin Çalışan Performansına Etkisi: Sağlık Çalışanları Üzerinde Bir Araştırma”, Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, 19(3), 271-281.
  48. Kutner, M.H., Nachtsheim, C.J., Neter, J. ve Li, W. (2005). “Applied Linear Statistical Models” (5th ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York.
  49. Liu, J., Xu, R. ve Wang, Z. (2024). “The Effects of Psychological Capital, Work Engagement and Job Autonomy on Job Performance in Platform Flexible Employees”, Scientific Reports, 14(1), 18434. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-69484-3
  50. Luthans, F. (2002). “Positive Organizational Behavior: Developing and Managing Psychological Strengths”, The Academy of Management Executive, 16(1), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.2002.6640181
  51. Luthans, F., Avey, J.B., Avolio, B.J., Norman, S.M. ve Combs, G.M. (2006a). “Psychological Capital Development: Toward a Micro-Intervention”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 387-393. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.373
  52. Luthans, F., Avey, J.B. ve Patera, J.L. (2008a). “Experimental Analysis of a Web-Based Training Intervention to Develop Positive Psychological Capital”, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(2), 209-221. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2008.32712618
  53. Luthans, F., Avolio, B.J., Avey, J.B. ve Norman, S.M. (2007). “Positive Psychological Capital: Measurement and Relationship with Performance and Satisfaction”, Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541-572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00083.x
  54. Luthans, F., Avolio, B.J., Walumbwa, F.O. ve Li, W. (2005). “The Psychological Capital of Chinese Workers: Exploring the Relationship with Performance”, Management and Organization Review, 1(2), 249-271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2005.00011.x
  55. Luthans, F., Luthans, B.C. ve Luthans, K.W. (2004). “Positive Psychological Capital: Beyond Human and Social Capital”, Business Horizons, 47(1), 45-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2003.11.007
  56. Luthans, F., Norman, S.M., Avolio, B.J. ve Avey, J.B. (2008b). “The Mediating Role of Psychological Capital in the Supportive Organizational Climate-Employee Performance Relationship”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(2), 219-238. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.507
  57. Luthans, F. ve Youssef, C.M. (2007). “Emerging Positive Organizational Behavior”, Journal of Management, 33(3), 321-349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300814
  58. Luthans, F., Youssef, C.M. ve Avolio, B.J. (2007a). "Psychological Capital: Developing the Human Competitive Edge”, Oxford University Press, New York.
  59. Luthans, F., Youssef, C.M. ve Avolio, B.J. (2007b). “Psychological Capital: Investing and Developing Positive Organizational Behavior”, Positive Organizational Behavior (Editörler: D.L. Nelson, C.L. Cooper), Sage Publications, London, 9-24.
  60. Marsh, H.W. ve Hocevar, D. (1985). “Application of Confirmatory Factor Analysis to the Study of Self-Concept: First- and Higher Order Factor Models and Their Invariance Across Groups”, Psychological Bulletin, 97(3), 562-582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.97.3.562
  61. Masten, A.S. ve Reed, M.G. (2002). “Resilience in Development”, The Handbook of Positive Psychology, (Editör: C. R. Snyder ve S. J. Lopez), Oxford University Press, New York, 74-88.
  62. Motowidlo, S.J., Borman, W.C. ve Schmit, M.J. (1997). “A Theory of Individual Differences in Task and Contextual Performance”, Human Performance, 10(2), 71-83. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327043HUP1002_1
  63. Motowidlo, S.J. (2003). “Job Performance”, Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Editörler: W.C. Borman, D.R. Ilgen, R.J. Klimoski) (Editor-in-Chief: Irving B. Weiner), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, USA, 39-53.
  64. Muthukumar, K., Riasudeen, S. ve Mathivanan, S. (2017). “The Impact of Psychological Capital on Job Performance: A Study Among Indian Scientists”, International Journal of Business Excellence, 13(1), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2017.085795
  65. Öğüt, A. ve Kaplan, M. (2015). “Sağlık Sektöründe Psikolojik Sermayenin İş Performansı Üzerindeki Etkisi”, Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 30, 87-99. https://doi.org/10.30976/susead.302176
  66. Özdamar, K. (2002). “Paket Programlar ile İstatistiksel Veri Analizi-1”, 4. Baskı, Kaan Kitabevi, Eskişehir.
  67. Peterson, S.J., Luthans, F., Avolio, B.J., Walumbwa, F.O. ve Zhang, Z. (2011). “Psychological Capital and Employee Performance: A Latent Growth Modeling Approach”, Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 427‑450. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744‑6570.2011.01215.x
  68. Rego, A., Marques, C., Leal, S., Sousa, F. ve Cunha, M.P.E. (2010). “Psychological Capital And Performance of Portuguese Civil Servants: Exploring Neutralizers İn The Context of An Appraisal System”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(9), 1531‑1552. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2010.488459
  69. Richardson, G.E. (2002). “The Metatheory of Resilience and Resiliency”, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(3), 307-321. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10020
  70. Rotundo, M. ve Sackett, P.R. (2002). “The Relative İmportance of Task, Citizenship, and Counterproductive Performance to Global Ratings of Job Performance: A Policy‑Capturing Approach”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 66‑80. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021‑9010.87.1.66
  71. Saithong-in, S. (2016). “Psychological Capital and Job Performance: An Empirical Research of Certified Public Accountants (CPAs) in Thailand”, The Business and Management Review, 7(5), 499-506.
  72. Seligman, M.E.P. (1998). “Learned Optimism”, Pocket Books, New York, USA.
  73. Seligman, M.E.P. ve Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). “Positive Psychology: An Introduction”, American Psychologist, 55(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
  74. Sigler, T.H. ve Pearson, C.M. (2000). “Creating an Empowering Culture: Examining the Relationship Between Organizational Culture and Perceptions of Empowerment”, Journal of Quality Management, 5(1), 27‑52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1084-8568(00)00011-0
  75. Snyder, C.R. (1994). “The Psychology of Hope: You Can Get There from Here”, Free Press, New York, USA.
  76. Snyder, C.R. (2002). “Hope Theory: Rainbows in the Mind”, Psychological Inquiry, 13(4), 249‑275. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1304_01
  77. Stajkovic, A.D. ve Luthans, F. (1998). “Social Cognitive Theory and Self‑Efficacy: Going Beyond Traditional Motivational and Behavioral Approaches”, Organizational Dynamics, 26(4), 62‑74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090‑2616(98)90006‑7
  78. Tabachnick, B.G. ve Fidell, L.S. (2019). “Using Multivariate Statistics” (7th ed.). Pearson, New York.
  79. Tavakol, M. ve Dennick, R. (2011). “Making Sense of Cronbach's Alpha”, International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
  80. Tiger, L. (1971). “Optimism: The Biology of Hope”, Simon & Schuster, New York, USA.
  81. Tucker, L.R. ve Lewis, C. (1973). “A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis”, Psychometrika, 38(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291170
  82. Wood, R. ve Bandura, A. (1989). “Impact of Conceptions of Ability on Self-Regulatory Mechanisms and Complex Decision Making”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 407-415. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.407
  83. Yükseköğretim Kurulu (2023). “Yükseköğretim İstatistikleri”, https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr (Erişim Tarihi: 30.06.2023).
  84. Zeng, Z. ve Xiong, S. (2024). “A Study on the Relationship Between Instructors’ Psychological Capital and Job Performance in Private Universities: The Mediating Role of Quality of Work Life”, Modern Management Based on Big Data V, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA240264