Journals / Uluslararası Sosyal Siyasal ve Mali Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2

Spending Reviews: A Theoretical Perspective

Harcama Gözden Geçirmeleri: Teorik Bir Perspektif

Özlem Bapbacı(Yozgat Bozok Üniversitesi)0000-0001-9370-1583
Tekin Akdemir(Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi)0000-0003-2761-163X
Pages
156–170
Publication Date
2024-10-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, spending reviews, which have been implemented in many OECD and EU member states and integrated with budget processes, are evaluated from a theoretical perspective.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Global crises, demographic changes, energy demand increases, environmental problems, increases in ageing and health expenditures, and unpredictable factors such as epidemics and pandemics in the last two hundred years have led to an increase in public expenditures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The fact that the increase in revenues was not accompanied by an increase in expenditures has led many OECD countries to emphasise the effectiveness and efficiency of expenditures since the 1980s.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, spending reviews, which have been implemented in many OECD and EU member states and integrated with budget processes, are evaluated from a theoretical perspective.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Harcama Gözden Geçirmeleri · Bütçe Tasarrufu · Verimlilik

Abstract

Global crises, demographic changes, energy demand increases, environmental problems, increases in ageing and health expenditures, and unpredictable factors such as epidemics and pandemics in the last two hundred years have led to an increase in public expenditures. The fact that the increase in revenues was not accompanied by an increase in expenditures has led many OECD countries to emphasise the effectiveness and efficiency of expenditures since the 1980s. This has brought the spending reviews to the agenda. Spending reviews, which are tools that enhance the efficiency of budget expenditures and prioritize resources in line with socioeconomic policy objectives, have been adopted as a systematic process to deeply analyze current expenditures. This allows for the identification of inefficient expenditures and their reduction, reorganization, or cancellation. In this study, spending reviews, which have been implemented in many OECD and EU member states and integrated with budget processes, are evaluated from a theoretical perspective.

Özet

Son iki yüz yıllık süreçte yaşanan küresel krizler, demografik değişiklikler, enerji talebi artışları, çevre sorunları, yaşlılık ve sağlık harcamalarındaki artışlar ile salgın ve pandemi gibi öngörülemeyen faktörler kamu harcamalarının artmasına yol açmıştır. Gelirdeki artışın harcama artışına eşlik etmemesi, 1980’lerden bu yana birçok OECD ülkesinde harcamaların etkinliğinin ve verimliliğinin ön plana çıkmasına sebep olmuştur. Bu durum, harcama gözden geçirmelerini gündeme getirmiştir. Bütçe harcamalarında etkinliğin arttırılması ve sosyoekonomik politika hedefleri doğrultusunda kaynakların önceliklendirilmesini sağlayan araçlardan biri olan harcama gözden geçirmeleri, mevcut harcamaları derinlemesine analiz ederek verimsiz harcamaların belirlenmesini ve bunların azaltılmasını, yeniden düzenlenmesini ya da iptal edilmesini sağlayan sistematik bir süreç olarak kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada, birçok OECD ve AB üyesi ülkede uygulama alanı bulan ve bütçe süreçleriyle entegre olarak çalışan harcama gözden geçirmelerinin teorik bir bakış açısıyla değerlendirilmesi yapılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bapbacı, Ö., Akdemir, T. (2024). Spending Reviews: A Theoretical Perspective. Uluslararası Sosyal Siyasal ve Mali Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 156–170. https://doi.org/10.70101/ussmad.1524263

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (31)

  1. Ajam, T. (2024). Applying spending review theory to developing countries: The case of South Africa. Development Southern Africa, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2024.2333386
  2. Alexander, D., & Osborne, G. (2013, June 14). What is the Spending Round? https://www.gov.uk/government/news/what-is-the-spending-round
  3. Austerity Measures Presidential Decree, 32549 Resmî Gazete (2024). https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2024/05/20240517-5.pdf
  4. Bartrum, O., & Paxton, B. (2024, January 29). Spending Reviews. Institute for Government. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainer/spending-reviews
  5. Bova, E., Ercoli, R., & Bosch, X. V. (2020). Spending Reviews: Some Insights from Practitioners. European Commission, Discussion Papers-135, Article 135. https://economy-finance.ec.europa.eu/document/download/0f201b23-d84f-4c4d-84ac-ece9f13dddd6_en?filename=dp135_en.pdf
  6. Catalano, G., & Erbacci, A. (2018). A theoretical framework for spending review policies at a time of widespread recession. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 17(2), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-17-5j8z25k1ltjc
  7. Chang, W.-H., & Kim, J.-W. (2021). A Study on Establishing an Expenditure Restructuring System for Active Fiscal Policy Management (21–03). KIPF (Korea Institute of Public Finance). https://repository.kipf.re.kr/handle/201201/7959
  8. Finance Act 1998, § 36 (1998). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/36/part/VI
  9. Hawkesworth, I., & Klepsvik, K. (2013). Budgeting levers, strategic agility and the use of performance budgeting in 2011/12. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 13(1), 105–140. https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-13-5k3ttg15bs31
  10. HM Treasury. (2021). Autumn Budget and Spending Review 2021: Documents. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/autumn-budget-and-spending-review-2021-documents
  11. HM Treasury. (2024). Policy papers and consultations. https://www.gov.uk/search/policy-papers-and-consultations
  12. HM Treasury, & Sunak, R. (2021, September 7). Spending Review 2021 launch letter. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/spending-review-2021-launch-letter
  13. House of Commons (Ed.). (1998). Finance Act 1998 (Section 155) (Vol. 322). https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1998/dec/09/finance-act-1998-section-155
  14. IMF. (2019). Chile: Technical Assistance Report-Introducing and Institutionalizing Spending Reviews (19/271). International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR/Issues/2019/09/24/Chile-Technical-Assistance-Report-Introducing-and-Institutionalizing-Spending-Reviews-48586
  15. Kennedy, F., & Howlin, J. (2017). Spending reviews in Ireland – Learning from experience. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 16(2), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-16-5jg30cchf0g0
  16. OBR. (2022). Economic and fiscal outlook—March 2022 (CP 648). Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. https://obr.uk/docs/dlm_uploads/CCS0222366764-001_OBR-EFO-March-2022_Web-Accessible-2.pdf
  17. OBR. (2024). Economic and fiscal outlook – March 2024 (CP 1027). Controller of His Majesty’s Stationery Office. https://obr.uk/efo/economic-and-fiscal-outlook-march-2024/
  18. OECD. (2004). Case Studies of Selected OECD Countries-United Kingdom. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 4(3), 155–479. https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-v4-art17-en
  19. OECD. (2017). Government at a Glance 2017. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/government-at-a-glance-2017_gov_glance-2017-en
  20. OECD. (2021). Government at a Glance 2021. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/government-at-a-glance-2021_1c258f55-en
  21. OECD. (2024). Spending reviews. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/spending-reviews.html
  22. PEMPAL. (2022). Spending Review Practices in the Netherlands. Budget Community of Practice (BCOP). https://www.pempal.org/knowledge-product/spending-review-practices-netherlands
  23. Pollitt, C. (2010). Cuts and reforms—Public services as we move into a new era. 32(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1556/socec.32.2010.1.3
  24. Robinson, M. (2013). Spending Reviews. GOV/PGC/SBO(2013)6. https://one.oecd.org/document/GOV/PGC/SBO(2013)6/en/pdf
  25. Robinson, M. (2014). Spending Reviews. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 13(2). https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/spending-reviews_budget-13-5jz14bz8p2hd
  26. Schick, A. (2013). "Chapter 1: Reflections On Two Decades Of Public Financial Management Reforms". In Public Financial Management and Its Emerging Architecture. USA: International Monetary Fund. Retrieved Jul 22, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475531091.071.ch001
  27. Tanzi, V. (2008). The Role of the State and Public Finance in the Next Generation. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 8(2). https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/budget-v8-art6-en.pdf?expires=1720336025&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=2513AF166930B79F12A100770E62B248
  28. Tanzi, V., & Schuknecht, L. (2000). Public Spending in the 20th Century: A Global Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
  29. The Chancellor’s speech announcing the Comprehensive Spending Review (Vol. 316) (with Brown, G.). (1998). https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/1998-07-14/debates/7695540c-0ab0-4299-b58b-6cf82a0fffef/ComprehensiveSpendingReview
  30. The World Bank. (2018). Bulgaria—Spending Review Manual. https://documentos.bancomundial.org/es/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/940921532366222268/Bulgaria-spending-review-manual
  31. Vandierendonck, C. (2014). Public Spending Reviews: Design, conduct, implementation. European Economy-Economic Papers 2008-2015, Article 525. https://ideas.repec.org//p/euf/ecopap/0525.html